Comments on: SES Chicago 2005

By: Stan

Stan — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:58:05 +0000

Do not worry, probably is my mistake I just jumped like this. Nothing personally, just waiting for another update like Jagger- then probably we all have to close ….

By: Aaron Pratt

Aaron Pratt — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:27:45 +0000

Stan – Sorry if I was misunderstanding you and lumping you in with the following. During the jagger updates I spent much time in the webmaster forums. The thing that got a little old was all the posts trying to prove that Google does not have relevant results anymore before the update even ended. Heck, I have been bitching and moaning since day 1 but one thing that is surely a waste of time is trying to prove something that is incorrect because you have been discovered and devalued. See it as a challenge and seek information to improve yourself.

By: Stan

Stan — Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:38:44 +0000

Aaron ,

Why do you think I would like to convince someone in something with my writings? It was simply question of why Google admit PORN LINKS, nothing else. Are they important, or valuable or relevant? They must be a reason to shows us these links, isn’t it? All I needed is to try to understand how it works. Everybody knows that there is no logic to do this. It could be mistake in Google, in could be everything, again- all I needed is to understand how it works….

P.S.
Never will allow to offence someone he is stupid, or not smart enough, remember this…

By: Spider Ninja

Spider Ninja — Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:37:45 +0000

Hey Barry…nice photo

By: Aaron Pratt

Aaron Pratt — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:15:43 +0000

Stan – I do not think you will convince Matt that Google’s results are less relevant, he is a little bit smarter than this as we have seen, and I am not a suckup, just tired of hearing that type of whining. If you want to fire up an angry mob of webmasters you will need more than that.

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:16:30 +0000

RE: “Why not put the same example to a bricks and mortar shop. Don’t worry about advertising. Build a great shop that has the best products and people will come right? Not quite. What if no one comes to your shop when it opens? Well there is no one to talk about your shop to their friends. So no one comes.”

Sure, if want to compare apples to oranges….

RE: “Aquiring links is essential to get the ball rolling.”

That’s what I said

By: Music Videos

Music Videos — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:05:59 +0000

Google IMO is the best over Yahoo and MSN. In fact, my SEO is directly towards Google. How is really Google suppost to know which urls has been bought or not? It is nearly impossible untill Google starts to spy in people’s emails…

By: Net Dragger

Net Dragger — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:01:58 +0000

Is that Dr. Phil two rows back in the right side of the picture?

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:14:20 +0000

The results from Google are still the most relevant ones IMO. My problems are related to Blogger and Google’s Blog Search Engine.

By: Johny Favourite

Johny Favourite — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:25:46 +0000

It’s all very simple IMO. Think humans not SE. Think content not links. Do that and you and most SE are all singing from the same song book.

Thats a great idea.

Why not put the same example to a bricks and mortar shop. Don’t worry about advertising. Build a great shop that has the best products and people will come right? Not quite. What if no one comes to your shop when it opens? Well there is no one to talk about your shop to their friends. So no one comes.

Aquiring links is essential to get the ball rolling.

Then you can follow the original advice.