Comments on: My favorite logo https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/ Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:30:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 By: Brandorama https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18156 Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:15:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18156 I totally agree – GOOGLE is an amzing brand!

It is dynamic, modern, creative and aesthetically appealing. The designers need a good pat on their back’s for this ingenious brand.

Well done GOOGLE!

http://www.threerooms.com

]]> By: Jessica Luthi https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18155 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:10:37 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18155 Google ignore UK Mothers?
Did google.co.uk forget to upload their homage mother’s day logo to the millions of UK Mothers on mothers day Sunday 26th March?

As an American led search giant that makes a point of acknowledging countries customs by changing the google logo to reflect the countries occasions, it seems to have forgotten about Mothersday on Sunday 26th March. So to help you out I have made a google a logo for you http://www.affiliateprogramadvice.com/deargoogle.htm .

Regards

Jessica Luthi

]]> By: Redscowl Bluesingsky https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18154 Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:21:51 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18154 Hey, I like the Mondrian Logo, but isn’t it against Google Trademark to put their logo on your website?

]]> By: osu9400 https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18153 Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:05:57 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18153 I love/respect Dr. King, but today’s logo is a tad on the cheesy side.

]]> By: Chompy https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18152 Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:41:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18152 Dan Freakly, see the following comments above:

Aaron Pratt Said,
January 5, 2006 @ 5:04 am

David Ogletree Said,
January 6, 2006 @ 9:48 am

]]> By: Dan Freakley https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18151 Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:28:20 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18151 How the hell can the blind see it to appreciate it?

]]> By: Psycho https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18150 Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:02:14 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18150 You can pick any Google logo you like, add this to the Google Personalised Home Page
http://www.google.com/ig/modules/googlelogo.xml

]]> By: Jonah Stein https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18149 Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:25:01 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18149 Matt:

Thanks for the great work and helpful information.

I am interested in any insites you can give us about dynamic links, spidering and canonicalization. The discussion I would love to see is concerning how database/query driven content is spidered and how to avoid content duplication penalties.

A few years ago I devised a static directory structure to allow our product pages to be indexed correctly. This has worked pretty well and is clearly white hat.

1. Although the products each have a static page in our directory, they can also be pulled up by a query string so http://www.psprint.com/printing_products/premium_flyers_printing.asp is the same content as http://www.psprint.com/products/index.asp?dc=1040 except the static landing page contains a unique unique header whereas the dynamic version has a common header.

2. http://www.psprint.com/printing_products/premium_flyers_printing.asp may also be diplayed with tracking links, resulting in http://www.psprint.com/printing_products/premium_flyers_printing.asp?engine=adwords+keyword=flyer+printing

Occassionally, I have seen the base URL and the URL with the tracking links show up as 2 separate links. Any information would be great.

Thanks

]]> By: Ryan https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18148 Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:26:22 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18148 typing in the googo.com name looks like some domainer already beat you to it.

]]> By: David Ogletree https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/my-favorite-logo/#comment-18147 Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:48:32 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=160#comment-18147 I am a legally blind person (low vision) who can read some Braille. I really appreciated the logo. I knew exactly what it was when I saw it. Braille needs more attention. Not enough people that need it are being taught it. The establishment thinks that if you can read any print at all you don’t need to learn Braille. Because of this there are many illiterate people out there with low vision. Unless you can read exactly like a sighted person you should learn Braille.

]]>