<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Webspam in 2009?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Scott Schaefer</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-888914</link> <dc:creator>Scott Schaefer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:16:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-888914</guid> <description>I realize I&#039;m late to the suggestion party, but perhaps Google could start a registry of known spammers (for consultants who create non-relevant links &lt;i&gt;en masse&lt;/i&gt; for customers) or for sites that continually create non-relevant comments (ie Best Viagra Deals) on blog posts in an effort to create links. One of my blogs must get 50-75 per day.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I&#8217;m late to the suggestion party, but perhaps Google could start a registry of known spammers (for consultants who create non-relevant links <i>en masse</i> for customers) or for sites that continually create non-relevant comments (ie Best Viagra Deals) on blog posts in an effort to create links. One of my blogs must get 50-75 per day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tonyzhao</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-810847</link> <dc:creator>Tonyzhao</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:12:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-810847</guid> <description>I find it odd that their so-called reports by consumers all seem to be written by an SEO copywriter, that knows how to both complain about a company and do so in a way that increases SEO. They’re a lucky bunch to find so many legitimate complainers that also happen to be SEO copywriters don’t you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it odd that their so-called reports by consumers all seem to be written by an SEO copywriter, that knows how to both complain about a company and do so in a way that increases SEO. They’re a lucky bunch to find so many legitimate complainers that also happen to be SEO copywriters don’t you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rob</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-795198</link> <dc:creator>rob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 07:47:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-795198</guid> <description>I am a big fan of Matt Cutts. Aaron Newton made a good point. Is there a followup post to see if any of these suggestions happend?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big fan of Matt Cutts. Aaron Newton made a good point. Is there a followup post to see if any of these suggestions happend?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefano</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-654287</link> <dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-654287</guid> <description>I&#039;d like to see Google de-rank those ultra often updated blog network that make their lives republishing other&#039;s feeds excerpt and full filling every page with ads (even AdSense).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see Google de-rank those ultra often updated blog network that make their lives republishing other&#8217;s feeds excerpt and full filling every page with ads (even AdSense).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arvind Katke</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-610233</link> <dc:creator>Arvind Katke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-610233</guid> <description>Create some Certification for WebSpammers Detective. I think this must be taken care by group of SEO people taking initiative. Everytime some new tricks to spam is invented atleast one of these Detectives can buzz the alarm and Google Spam team can start taking actions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Create some Certification for WebSpammers Detective. I think this must be taken care by group of SEO people taking initiative. Everytime some new tricks to spam is invented atleast one of these Detectives can buzz the alarm and Google Spam team can start taking actions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russell</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-610114</link> <dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-610114</guid> <description>Hi Matt,I think the term is &#039;referrer bombing&#039;?A lot of my sites have shown that i have had traffic from a lots of sites with .golbnet.com extension but when I log on to these sites i cannot find a link to mine? Still baffles me but doing a bit of research a lot of other web-masters are having the same problem. Would this type of spam hinder our rankings?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p><p>I think the term is &#8216;referrer bombing&#8217;?</p><p>A lot of my sites have shown that i have had traffic from a lots of sites with .golbnet.com extension but when I log on to these sites i cannot find a link to mine? Still baffles me but doing a bit of research a lot of other web-masters are having the same problem. Would this type of spam hinder our rankings?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-608475</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:15:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-608475</guid> <description>Google saya &quot;The life span of a Google query normally lasts less than half a second, yet involves a number of different steps that must be completed before results can be delivered to a person seeking information.&quot; Is this true or do you cache popular results for a pre determined amount of time? I&#039;d really like to know.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google saya &#8220;The life span of a Google query normally lasts less than half a second, yet involves a number of different steps that must be completed before results can be delivered to a person seeking information.&#8221; Is this true or do you cache popular results for a pre determined amount of time? I&#8217;d really like to know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-593466</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:36:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-593466</guid> <description>Hi Matt, Is there a form for submitting general issues with search results? For example a search for &#039;merchant services&#039; in Google.co.uk brings up a local search map which is irrelevant,  I would like to see some way of reporting searches like these? Tom</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> Is there a form for submitting general issues with search results?<br /> For example a search for &#8216;merchant services&#8217; in Google.co.uk brings up a local search map which is irrelevant,  I would like to see some way of reporting searches like these?<br /> Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sal allan</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-592986</link> <dc:creator>sal allan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-592986</guid> <description>salameh allanHi Matt,I want to suggest a few methods to improve search to return relevant results and to improve the search experience.1. If you look at how the trading market works, it depends on news, who made the news and where the news comes from. If we can say matt cutt says websiteA is a good website and Matt Cutt is a known figure on the internet then maybe we can put a weight on the site to say, yaa this site got an approval from a well trusted person on the net. Its the same how the market operate on news and trusted source.2. Certificates, allot of sites are verified by verisign, a trusted organisation, so if we promote such activity this can lead to better and trusted sites.3. Look at if the site gets put in the news for good reasons, maybe downgrade for bad reasons.4. Look at Alexa traffic as an example maybe for more information about the site5. Maybe use the company registration to verify the company6. Use the yellow pages, ie trusted directories7. Authors tag on the site, build a database of authors who trusted</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>salameh allan</p><p>Hi Matt,</p><p>I want to suggest a few methods to improve search to return relevant results and to improve the search experience.</p><p>1. If you look at how the trading market works, it depends on news, who made the news and where the news comes from. If we can say matt cutt says websiteA is a good website and Matt Cutt is a known figure on the internet then maybe we can put a weight on the site to say, yaa this site got an approval from a well trusted person on the net. Its the same how the market operate on news and trusted source.</p><p>2. Certificates, allot of sites are verified by verisign, a trusted organisation, so if we promote such activity this can lead to better and trusted sites.</p><p>3. Look at if the site gets put in the news for good reasons, maybe downgrade for bad reasons.</p><p>4. Look at Alexa traffic as an example maybe for more information about the site</p><p>5. Maybe use the company registration to verify the company</p><p>6. Use the yellow pages, ie trusted directories</p><p>7. Authors tag on the site, build a database of authors who trusted</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phillip Monk</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webspam-in-2009/#comment-592561</link> <dc:creator>Phillip Monk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:43:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1805#comment-592561</guid> <description>Hi MattI think Ripoffreport and the rest like it. We could all build a site like Ripoffreport and start posting bad things.i found the site when i was looking for an seo company i know I found some very bad reports. I used my own steam to find if the story was true. (it was not). so find sites like that unfair. Goodluck with you work your doing a great job.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt</p><p>I think Ripoffreport and the rest like it. We could all build a site like Ripoffreport and start posting bad things.i found the site when i was looking for an seo company i know I found some very bad reports. I used my own steam to find if the story was true. (it was not). so find sites like that unfair.<br /> Goodluck with you work your doing a great job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 19:00:51 -->
