<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Submit video questions for May 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teo Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-880722</link>
		<dc:creator>Teo Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-880722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi
I have a question with no concrete answer in help forum(didn&#039;t found one yet).

If I have a domain mydomain.com and someone will do 301 redirects from spammed,banned domains to mydomain.com ... why my website is be affected? 
It&#039;s a simple way to be eliminated from first page..buy 10 .com domains, do the worse things to them to be banned from google....and after that redirect them to a competitor...
I think it(301 redirect) should be related/connected to same google-key.

Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I have a question with no concrete answer in help forum(didn&#8217;t found one yet).</p>
<p>If I have a domain mydomain.com and someone will do 301 redirects from spammed,banned domains to mydomain.com &#8230; why my website is be affected?<br />
It&#8217;s a simple way to be eliminated from first page..buy 10 .com domains, do the worse things to them to be banned from google&#8230;.and after that redirect them to a competitor&#8230;<br />
I think it(301 redirect) should be related/connected to same google-key.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-779975</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-779975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a general question about a organic seo keyword

The keyword is [website] and [web site]

I have a domain name that belongs in this organic cat., but I notice doing research that it seems google has blocked this specific keyword, [No new Domains added] [and search results stay the exact same over time]. Some site likes godaddy being on the top of the list there might be benefiting from this but I think its rather unfair to all the rest of the google users for these keywords to be blocks if they are indeed blocked.

Whats your take on this Matt?

Thanks

Paul J]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a general question about a organic seo keyword</p>
<p>The keyword is [website] and [web site]</p>
<p>I have a domain name that belongs in this organic cat., but I notice doing research that it seems google has blocked this specific keyword, [No new Domains added] [and search results stay the exact same over time]. Some site likes godaddy being on the top of the list there might be benefiting from this but I think its rather unfair to all the rest of the google users for these keywords to be blocks if they are indeed blocked.</p>
<p>Whats your take on this Matt?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Paul J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-768618</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-768618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Matt,

I got important question for you. I have a site that is not .com .org. .net or .us. Does it matter to get links from english sites to my foreign country site when looking at seo.

Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Matt,</p>
<p>I got important question for you. I have a site that is not .com .org. .net or .us. Does it matter to get links from english sites to my foreign country site when looking at seo.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Borch</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-761406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Borch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-761406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Matt,

In an interview you stated that a site needs to be built for the customer (as we have always focused on with success) you also said that search engines faceted navigation can be difficult from a search engine perspective (to my understanding and interpretation it’s a little conflicting which leaves me confused).

Which brings me to my Question:

With positive customer feedback we have been expanding faceted navigation (narrowed down sets of the same original content creating multiple pages by adding parameters in the URL) to help users narrow down our wide range products in any given category.

Does Google view it all as duplicate or low quality content? If so what is the best solution to make it clear for the crawlers to index all the variations for the right relevancy?

Jay, Monmouth NJ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Matt,</p>
<p>In an interview you stated that a site needs to be built for the customer (as we have always focused on with success) you also said that search engines faceted navigation can be difficult from a search engine perspective (to my understanding and interpretation it’s a little conflicting which leaves me confused).</p>
<p>Which brings me to my Question:</p>
<p>With positive customer feedback we have been expanding faceted navigation (narrowed down sets of the same original content creating multiple pages by adding parameters in the URL) to help users narrow down our wide range products in any given category.</p>
<p>Does Google view it all as duplicate or low quality content? If so what is the best solution to make it clear for the crawlers to index all the variations for the right relevancy?</p>
<p>Jay, Monmouth NJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Beacher</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-759887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Beacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-759887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Matt, 

Adobe is investing heavily in their Adobe Business Catalyst hosted cloud platform, but there&#039;s a big problem with sites launched there. When you develop a site, you start on yoursite.businesscatalyst.com. Later you atttach a domain name, yourowndomain.com, and that is how visitors later reach your site, although it is always still available at yoursite.businesscatalyst.com.  Then there&#039;s a third domain: if you do any secure transactions, Adobe shows the  whole site on yoursite.worldsecuresystems.com, since you can&#039;t have your own SSL attached to their hosted CMS plaftform.

The issue is Google is initially crawling the site yoursite.businesscatalyst.com because it&#039;s visible first, later also crawling yourowndomain.com, and even crawling yoursite.worldsecuresystems.com and seeing the exact same pages on three domains.

Adobe currently provides no way at present to do a 301 redirect between these three. The only way to avoid a Google duplicate penalty would be: 1) put a robots.txt in the root saying ignore all pages on yoursite.businesscatalyst.com although that seems risky as it might cause Google to also ding yourowndomain.com or 2) register yoursite.businesscatalyst.com in Webmaster Tools and ask URLs to be removed.

Is the only true solution getting Adobe to completely block all client sites on subdomains on businesscatalyst.com?  Google crawls businesscatalyst.com daily of course since Adobe has all the Business Catalyst content on the same domain: forums, help, their sales and marketing, as well as thousands of client sites around the world. When I post on the Adobe forum there, Google has it indexed the next day.

I have searched the Google Webmaster forum for an answer to a unique problem like this with a hosted CMS and multiple domains and can&#039;t seem to find a true answer of what a webmaster should do.

Any advice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Matt, </p>
<p>Adobe is investing heavily in their Adobe Business Catalyst hosted cloud platform, but there&#8217;s a big problem with sites launched there. When you develop a site, you start on yoursite.businesscatalyst.com. Later you atttach a domain name, yourowndomain.com, and that is how visitors later reach your site, although it is always still available at yoursite.businesscatalyst.com.  Then there&#8217;s a third domain: if you do any secure transactions, Adobe shows the  whole site on yoursite.worldsecuresystems.com, since you can&#8217;t have your own SSL attached to their hosted CMS plaftform.</p>
<p>The issue is Google is initially crawling the site yoursite.businesscatalyst.com because it&#8217;s visible first, later also crawling yourowndomain.com, and even crawling yoursite.worldsecuresystems.com and seeing the exact same pages on three domains.</p>
<p>Adobe currently provides no way at present to do a 301 redirect between these three. The only way to avoid a Google duplicate penalty would be: 1) put a robots.txt in the root saying ignore all pages on yoursite.businesscatalyst.com although that seems risky as it might cause Google to also ding yourowndomain.com or 2) register yoursite.businesscatalyst.com in Webmaster Tools and ask URLs to be removed.</p>
<p>Is the only true solution getting Adobe to completely block all client sites on subdomains on businesscatalyst.com?  Google crawls businesscatalyst.com daily of course since Adobe has all the Business Catalyst content on the same domain: forums, help, their sales and marketing, as well as thousands of client sites around the world. When I post on the Adobe forum there, Google has it indexed the next day.</p>
<p>I have searched the Google Webmaster forum for an answer to a unique problem like this with a hosted CMS and multiple domains and can&#8217;t seem to find a true answer of what a webmaster should do.</p>
<p>Any advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfvoucher</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-569033</link>
		<dc:creator>surfvoucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-569033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you please let us know when you&#039;ll reply the questions. Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please let us know when you&#8217;ll reply the questions. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Sefati</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-568287</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Sefati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-568287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30 day no extra work (only 9-6 job nothing after or weekends)

goodluck Matt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 day no extra work (only 9-6 job nothing after or weekends)</p>
<p>goodluck Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genux</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-562139</link>
		<dc:creator>genux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-562139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks Matt, you are a great help and also advice about learning things about search engines.. thanks very much..  just wait for my questions!! lol. I am hoping that they may be good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Matt, you are a great help and also advice about learning things about search engines.. thanks very much..  just wait for my questions!! lol. I am hoping that they may be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Nourhani</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-559318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Nourhani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 11:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-559318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i write a question.
thanks for help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i write a question.<br />
thanks for help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/webmaster-video-answers/#comment-558630</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=4039#comment-558630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed a major problem with your moderator page, it works in firefox but returns a blank page when using chrome. It has been blank in chrome since you put it up.

Chome does not render the page becuase the wrong DOCTYPE is uses, so you owe me a cookie.

For anyone having this problem, the page is reachable in firefox until they fix the doctype. Or you use inspect element in chrome and edit the doctype.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a major problem with your moderator page, it works in firefox but returns a blank page when using chrome. It has been blank in chrome since you put it up.</p>
<p>Chome does not render the page becuase the wrong DOCTYPE is uses, so you owe me a cookie.</p>
<p>For anyone having this problem, the page is reachable in firefox until they fix the doctype. Or you use inspect element in chrome and edit the doctype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a

 Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2013-05-20 19:36:10 by W3 Total Cache -->