<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Video: Datacenter comments</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ars</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-109810</link> <dc:creator>Ars</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:45:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-109810</guid> <description>Very useful SEO stuff in just one video. Matt you have great SEO cap. I would like one too. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful SEO stuff in just one video. Matt you have great SEO cap. I would like one too. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maximum Persuasion</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-109767</link> <dc:creator>Maximum Persuasion</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:49:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-109767</guid> <description>As do I! One of the better posts I&#039;ve been digging up over the past days.I used to research linking strategies at seobook.net . Looks I&#039;ll be hanging here and getting drunk over the Cutts site more frequently</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As do I! One of the better posts I&#8217;ve been digging up over the past days.</p><p>I used to research linking strategies at seobook.net . Looks I&#8217;ll be hanging here and getting drunk over the Cutts site more frequently</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shahid</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-104505</link> <dc:creator>Shahid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-104505</guid> <description>Hi Matt,I just wanted to pass my compliments for the useful array of SEO videos you have uploaded to Google Video.  The Data Center Video was well worth the watch....I totally agree the focus should be on specific and unique content.   also never thought of testing sites with a text reader in terms of usability.  I guess my list of priorities have been re-structured in-line with your video comments....Thanks againShahid.SEO</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p><p>I just wanted to pass my compliments for the useful array of SEO videos you have uploaded to Google Video.  The Data Center Video was well worth the watch&#8230;.I totally agree the focus should be on specific and unique content.   also never thought of testing sites with a text reader in terms of usability.  I guess my list of priorities have been re-structured in-line with your video comments&#8230;.</p><p>Thanks again</p><p>Shahid.SEO</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-103479</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:13:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-103479</guid> <description>Google did a great job with their cameo in the movie Crank (badass over-the-top action movie where all sorts of stuff blows up and people die, if you’re into that sort of thing). I saw it last night. You guys really lost yourselves in the moment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google did a great job with their cameo in the movie Crank (badass over-the-top action movie where all sorts of stuff blows up and people die, if you’re into that sort of thing). I saw it last night. You guys really lost yourselves in the moment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: K Bradman</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-100781</link> <dc:creator>K Bradman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:13:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-100781</guid> <description>I think know google gives lot of preference to the referential links. Links pointing to your webpage with some Keyword Oriented anchor text, this is similar to google bomb or google wash.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think know google gives lot of preference to the referential links. Links pointing to your webpage with some Keyword Oriented anchor text, this is similar to google bomb or google wash.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mick</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-94155</link> <dc:creator>mick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:05:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-94155</guid> <description>Hey mattI know this post is old but the video is offline - something along the lines of &#039;this video is no longer available&#039;.i was hoping to watch it again.Mick</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey matt</p><p>I know this post is old but the video is offline &#8211; something along the lines of &#8216;this video is no longer available&#8217;.</p><p>i was hoping to watch it again.</p><p>Mick</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kandk</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-88326</link> <dc:creator>kandk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-88326</guid> <description>Just saw this video but I liked video on crawl dates. Nice use of &quot;multi-media&quot;. :)On a side question: Now that google has purchased YouTube are ther any plans to integrate google video and youtube?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw this video but I liked video on crawl dates.<br /> Nice use of &#8220;multi-media&#8221;. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>On a side question: Now that google has purchased YouTube are ther any plans to integrate google video and youtube?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lori Eldridge</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-87704</link> <dc:creator>Lori Eldridge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:24:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-87704</guid> <description>Hi Matt,I have exausted all means of help so hoping you can look into this.  I manage a website that I redesigned last April. It had duplicate description tags and product descriptions which I fixed. It has a hyphen in the domain and was one of those that lost most of it&#039;s pages in May but slowly regained them all. It was a year old then and never had ranked for it&#039;s main keywords and still isn&#039;t except for the words in it&#039;s domain. This site is squeeky clean but it appears to be penalized for some reason that we can&#039;t fathom. The host said this was a new IP address when we changed hosts in early July so we don&#039;t believe it&#039;s a poisoned domain. I sent in a reinclusion request 2 months ago and still no word from Google so I&#039;m wondering if you can check on it. Not sure I should post the url so if you can email me I&#039;ll send you the info.Take care Lori</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p><p>I have exausted all means of help so hoping you can look into this.  I manage a website that I redesigned last April. It had duplicate description tags and product descriptions which I fixed. It has a hyphen in the domain and was one of those that lost most of it&#8217;s pages in May but slowly regained them all. It was a year old then and never had ranked for it&#8217;s main keywords and still isn&#8217;t except for the words in it&#8217;s domain. This site is squeeky clean but it appears to be penalized for some reason that we can&#8217;t fathom. The host said this was a new IP address when we changed hosts in early July so we don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a poisoned domain. I sent in a reinclusion request 2 months ago and still no word from Google so I&#8217;m wondering if you can check on it. Not sure I should post the url so if you can email me I&#8217;ll send you the info.</p><p>Take care<br /> Lori</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clement</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-82948</link> <dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:53:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-82948</guid> <description>Matt, to estimate how many total pages indexed by Google, I simply search keyword w/ some most common keyword like letter &#039;a&#039;, assuming almost 99% of pages contains such keyword &#039;a&#039;. so I got about 20Billion total pages from Google, 11B from Yahoo, and 2.5B from MSN. Interesting enough, I tried this over last couple months, at different dates so to sample the changes of total pages got indexed. And it did show quite some difference, although no question that Google has been the No.1 on the total number of indexed pages, way ahead of the No2&amp;3. However, the actual value change from 18B to 25B for Google over last couple months. So here are the questions: 1) why is 25B pages the limit? due to storage or computation(crawling/indexing) time constraint? Internet&#039;s total pages is growing rapidly, why I don&#039;t see the similar proportional growth in the total number of indexed pages? 2)thanks for the Cached time stamp showing when page was the crawled, how long does it take for the index to be updated after the completion of a crawling cycle (I presume indexing run simutaneously(or should I said right behind) crawling), how would any searchEngine keep up w/ the growing web pages ? is the indexing too slow to set the above 25B limit? or the crawler? 3)but I do see the news or blog got indexed in minutes or within 1 day, why not the rest of the web pages, get incrementally crawled &amp; indexed within 1 day or shorter? what&#039;s the constraint preventing this? I cann&#039;t wait to see Google provide search over the real-time web! How long are we gotna wait for this to happen?many thanks, Clement</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br /> to estimate how many total pages indexed by Google, I simply search keyword w/ some most common keyword like letter &#8216;a&#8217;, assuming almost 99% of pages contains such keyword &#8216;a&#8217;.<br /> so I got about 20Billion total pages from Google, 11B from Yahoo, and 2.5B from MSN.<br /> Interesting enough, I tried this over last couple months, at different dates so to sample the changes of total pages got indexed. And it did show quite some difference, although no question that Google has been the No.1 on the total number of indexed pages, way ahead of the No2&amp;3.<br /> However, the actual value change from 18B to 25B for Google over last couple months.<br /> So here are the questions:<br /> 1) why is 25B pages the limit? due to storage or computation(crawling/indexing) time constraint? Internet&#8217;s total pages is growing rapidly, why I don&#8217;t see the similar proportional growth in the total number of indexed pages?<br /> 2)thanks for the Cached time stamp showing when page was the crawled,<br /> how long does it take for the index to be updated after the completion of a crawling cycle (I presume indexing run simutaneously(or should I said right behind) crawling), how would any searchEngine keep up w/ the growing web pages ? is the indexing too slow to set the above 25B limit? or the crawler?<br /> 3)but I do see the news or blog got indexed in minutes or within 1 day,<br /> why not the rest of the web pages, get incrementally crawled &amp; indexed within 1 day or shorter? what&#8217;s the constraint preventing this?<br /> I cann&#8217;t wait to see Google provide search over the real-time web! How long are we gotna wait for this to happen?</p><p>many thanks,<br /> Clement</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gregorio</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/video-datacenter-comments/#comment-80321</link> <dc:creator>gregorio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 10:08:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=372#comment-80321</guid> <description>Hi Matt,I just noticed you deleted my comment... Was it because I was critical to the way Google managed the 27th June issue? Or was it because I compared Google to the IBM of the 70&#039;s?Gregorio</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p><p>I just noticed you deleted my comment&#8230;<br /> Was it because I was critical to the way Google managed the 27th June issue?<br /> Or was it because I compared Google to the IBM of the 70&#8242;s?</p><p>Gregorio</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 23:55:58 -->
