<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on Jagger 3: Still a few more days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-400318</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-400318</guid>
		<description>Very good question and I guess the answer is sadly “wait and see”. ;-(
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good question and I guess the answer is sadly “wait and see”. ;-(<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pénzügyi Tanácsadó</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-102010</link>
		<dc:creator>Pénzügyi Tanácsadó</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-102010</guid>
		<description>What do you want to do with 66.102.15.100 IP address? This IP is of the default Google Blogger server. What&#039;s helping is need by you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you want to do with 66.102.15.100 IP address? This IP is of the default Google Blogger server. What&#8217;s helping is need by you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>I got hit badly by the Sep 22 changes, although I don&#039;t do anything untoward.  My site is still in the index but ranks for absolutely nothing - just as I started making some headway within Google.

Any chance of letting us know why the Sep 22 changes lost so many of us our positions when we&#039;re essentially doing nothing wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got hit badly by the Sep 22 changes, although I don&#8217;t do anything untoward.  My site is still in the index but ranks for absolutely nothing &#8211; just as I started making some headway within Google.</p>
<p>Any chance of letting us know why the Sep 22 changes lost so many of us our positions when we&#8217;re essentially doing nothing wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>Can someone tell me how to &quot;check your site 66.102.15.100&quot; ?
I am not sure how to do this.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone tell me how to &#8220;check your site 66.102.15.100&#8243; ?<br />
I am not sure how to do this.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Degen</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3309</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Degen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3309</guid>
		<description>Matt,
  In keeping up with spam reporting, I found this 3
site link network that looked pretty interesting.  It
appears that this technique works and these sites are
able to manufacture pretty decent PR and keyword
positioning for voxeo.com.  

www.voxeo.com #1 IVR on Google
www.vxml.org
www.rjauburn.com

All three are owned by voxeo but have 3 different
registrations.  All run on same domain server.

Here&#039;s the network

voxeo links out once to vxml HOME on every pages.

rjauburn links twice to voxeo HOME every page (IVR &amp;
VoiceXML).  No links back

vxml links twice to voxeo every page (IVR &amp; VoiceXML)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
  In keeping up with spam reporting, I found this 3<br />
site link network that looked pretty interesting.  It<br />
appears that this technique works and these sites are<br />
able to manufacture pretty decent PR and keyword<br />
positioning for voxeo.com.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.voxeo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voxeo.com</a> #1 IVR on Google<br />
<a href="http://www.vxml.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.vxml.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.rjauburn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rjauburn.com</a></p>
<p>All three are owned by voxeo but have 3 different<br />
registrations.  All run on same domain server.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the network</p>
<p>voxeo links out once to vxml HOME on every pages.</p>
<p>rjauburn links twice to voxeo HOME every page (IVR &amp;<br />
VoiceXML).  No links back</p>
<p>vxml links twice to voxeo every page (IVR &amp; VoiceXML)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>Does anyone at Google actually realize how much damage these &#039;updates&#039; are doing to legitimate sites?

My traffic was dropped from 5-6k visits per day down to 1100 when Google started &#039;fixing&#039; things. 

More then 140 key search phrases tanked along with the site traffic. What rose up to take my place were made for adsense sites that stole the title&#039;s and content from my own to take my place. It&#039;s as clear as day because all my page titles are prefixed with my site&#039;s name. Yes, I have reported them, and no, I haven&#039;t seen any changes - they&#039;re still there.

It seems that Google is subsidizing this activity by paying those people adsense dollars.

My site is legit, helps thousands of people world-wide and generates/devlops it&#039;s own content (not scraping). 

Prior to the Google updates my site was seeing steady (all year) traffic of 5k visits per day and growing to 6k because of the content I was adding by helping others. 

I&#039;m not alone - there are many, many others who are reporting drastic drops to the extent that they may not be in business any longer.

On top of that, more and more reports are surfacing about people doing searches on Google and not finding anything relavent except scraper sites. Many people are turning to MSN or Yahoo to get an accurate search. 

Prior to the updates the scraper sites didn&#039;t matter to me. I was able to power right past them due to my site&#039;s well-deserved ownership of key phrases. Thousands of people were helped by my site&#039;s tech support answers and now there&#039;s so few people that several have commented that it&#039;s become like a ghost town. 

Talent that I had been trying to attract to the site mentioned to me that there&#039;s no need for them to answer questions - there&#039;s no backlog! On top of that I made a deal with top people at Microsoft to help with tech support for visitors to my site that are experiencing new bugs/problems. I also recently signed a deal for dedicated server hosting and what happens?

Google tanks my site and rewards the scraper sites. My adsense earnings drop like a rock and the scrapers make more then they ever have. I&#039;m not alone, there&#039;s thousands (if not millions) who have legitimate sites and have been ruined by Jagger. 

I don&#039;t understand what was wrong with Google in the first place. My site ranked near the top or at the top for all the key areas it&#039;s involved in. For me this means that people having problems immediately found relavent content that typically fixed their issues. As a result the customer was happy. 

Any phrases I didn&#039;t rank at the top on were appropriate, other sites had better ways of addressing the issue. It was fair and the customer won each time by finding the right content. My adsense earnings were covering the cost of site hosting and I was hoping for a little extra. Now I&#039;m back to paying out of pocket (like the last 4 years) to help others for free. 

Just when I thought I&#039;d finally found a way to help others and cover my costs and maybe, just hopefully earn a little for my time too the Jagger Effect set in and wiped out my site. I still have 1100 visits per day so if you have any more updates maybe you can cut my site right off at the knees too and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone at Google actually realize how much damage these &#8216;updates&#8217; are doing to legitimate sites?</p>
<p>My traffic was dropped from 5-6k visits per day down to 1100 when Google started &#8216;fixing&#8217; things. </p>
<p>More then 140 key search phrases tanked along with the site traffic. What rose up to take my place were made for adsense sites that stole the title&#8217;s and content from my own to take my place. It&#8217;s as clear as day because all my page titles are prefixed with my site&#8217;s name. Yes, I have reported them, and no, I haven&#8217;t seen any changes &#8211; they&#8217;re still there.</p>
<p>It seems that Google is subsidizing this activity by paying those people adsense dollars.</p>
<p>My site is legit, helps thousands of people world-wide and generates/devlops it&#8217;s own content (not scraping). </p>
<p>Prior to the Google updates my site was seeing steady (all year) traffic of 5k visits per day and growing to 6k because of the content I was adding by helping others. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not alone &#8211; there are many, many others who are reporting drastic drops to the extent that they may not be in business any longer.</p>
<p>On top of that, more and more reports are surfacing about people doing searches on Google and not finding anything relavent except scraper sites. Many people are turning to MSN or Yahoo to get an accurate search. </p>
<p>Prior to the updates the scraper sites didn&#8217;t matter to me. I was able to power right past them due to my site&#8217;s well-deserved ownership of key phrases. Thousands of people were helped by my site&#8217;s tech support answers and now there&#8217;s so few people that several have commented that it&#8217;s become like a ghost town. </p>
<p>Talent that I had been trying to attract to the site mentioned to me that there&#8217;s no need for them to answer questions &#8211; there&#8217;s no backlog! On top of that I made a deal with top people at Microsoft to help with tech support for visitors to my site that are experiencing new bugs/problems. I also recently signed a deal for dedicated server hosting and what happens?</p>
<p>Google tanks my site and rewards the scraper sites. My adsense earnings drop like a rock and the scrapers make more then they ever have. I&#8217;m not alone, there&#8217;s thousands (if not millions) who have legitimate sites and have been ruined by Jagger. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand what was wrong with Google in the first place. My site ranked near the top or at the top for all the key areas it&#8217;s involved in. For me this means that people having problems immediately found relavent content that typically fixed their issues. As a result the customer was happy. </p>
<p>Any phrases I didn&#8217;t rank at the top on were appropriate, other sites had better ways of addressing the issue. It was fair and the customer won each time by finding the right content. My adsense earnings were covering the cost of site hosting and I was hoping for a little extra. Now I&#8217;m back to paying out of pocket (like the last 4 years) to help others for free. </p>
<p>Just when I thought I&#8217;d finally found a way to help others and cover my costs and maybe, just hopefully earn a little for my time too the Jagger Effect set in and wiped out my site. I still have 1100 visits per day so if you have any more updates maybe you can cut my site right off at the knees too and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>Like everybody else, I have been sitting back watching jagger reworking the serp, s. My site, although small compared to my compition has done ok, and like everybody else, I will continue to work and improve and gain better ranking. What I can not understand is why sites using hidden text are again top in serp,s

Example:

Google search  66.102.9.104 

http://66.102.9.104/search?hl=en&amp;q=casa+varese&amp;btnG=Google+Search


http://www.babelecase.it/annunci/tipo.asp?id=Varese

No 1 hidden text, this is one of the biggest sites in Italy PR5. 1500000 pages indexed

http://www.risorseimmobiliari.it/tipo/case_varese.asp

No 4 hidden text  PR 4 240000 pages indexed.

http://www.casaepoi.it/link/varese/varese.htm

No16 hidden text PR4 120000 pages indexed

And these are some of the worst offenders, check it out, its spam city. So my question is, how do they get away with it, has jagger worked? At least MSN and Yahoo have spotted these offenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like everybody else, I have been sitting back watching jagger reworking the serp, s. My site, although small compared to my compition has done ok, and like everybody else, I will continue to work and improve and gain better ranking. What I can not understand is why sites using hidden text are again top in serp,s</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p>Google search  66.102.9.104 </p>
<p><a href="http://66.102.9.104/search?hl=en&amp;q=casa+varese&amp;btnG=Google+Search" rel="nofollow">http://66.102.9.104/search?hl=en&amp;q=casa+varese&amp;btnG=Google+Search</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.babelecase.it/annunci/tipo.asp?id=Varese" rel="nofollow">http://www.babelecase.it/annunci/tipo.asp?id=Varese</a></p>
<p>No 1 hidden text, this is one of the biggest sites in Italy PR5. 1500000 pages indexed</p>
<p><a href="http://www.risorseimmobiliari.it/tipo/case_varese.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.risorseimmobiliari.it/tipo/case_varese.asp</a></p>
<p>No 4 hidden text  PR 4 240000 pages indexed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.casaepoi.it/link/varese/varese.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.casaepoi.it/link/varese/varese.htm</a></p>
<p>No16 hidden text PR4 120000 pages indexed</p>
<p>And these are some of the worst offenders, check it out, its spam city. So my question is, how do they get away with it, has jagger worked? At least MSN and Yahoo have spotted these offenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in accommodation business, in small touristic town and me and 65 other business in our town we are for more than a month without listings in google. So no traffic no business, visits go down and they were about 15-20% of amout before this update. Our main keyword is the name of our town and now google is showing only some big sites under our keyword. What to do ? Me and others we are reading and reading, our webmasters do not know what to do. I think we are that made google big with our business, offers, sites that we built for our costumers and years and years we are making changes that google will like us!!?? At the moment no costumer which is seeking for kind of service we are offering can find us and our service on google, so  last week I and my frineds we start to get traffic from other search sites, even 10 to 20 times more as last few years. So what to do ? Goolge don&#039;t want to have us in it&#039;s listings and people like and want to have our service so they start to use other serach sites to find us and we have to help them. How ? We have one meeting yesterday and we will have another this week. The idea is to remove our sites from Google and from all big travel sites which are listed good in google, what means that under our main keyword there will be about 40% less listings. In this mont we learn how to survive without google and believe me our coustumers will learn where to find us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in accommodation business, in small touristic town and me and 65 other business in our town we are for more than a month without listings in google. So no traffic no business, visits go down and they were about 15-20% of amout before this update. Our main keyword is the name of our town and now google is showing only some big sites under our keyword. What to do ? Me and others we are reading and reading, our webmasters do not know what to do. I think we are that made google big with our business, offers, sites that we built for our costumers and years and years we are making changes that google will like us!!?? At the moment no costumer which is seeking for kind of service we are offering can find us and our service on google, so  last week I and my frineds we start to get traffic from other search sites, even 10 to 20 times more as last few years. So what to do ? Goolge don&#8217;t want to have us in it&#8217;s listings and people like and want to have our service so they start to use other serach sites to find us and we have to help them. How ? We have one meeting yesterday and we will have another this week. The idea is to remove our sites from Google and from all big travel sites which are listed good in google, what means that under our main keyword there will be about 40% less listings. In this mont we learn how to survive without google and believe me our coustumers will learn where to find us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>No idea why, or even if your site has been banned. I suggest you read Google guidelines and info and make your site squeaky clean.

If you want to run multiple subdomains you can, go for it. I would always opt for one big site when the themes are related though. Makes much more sense, holds no risks, easier for customers, no cross-linking, better for SE and better for SEO and Webmasters etc etc. It&#039;s only if the topics were totally unrelated that I would use sub domains, or different ones. Then, I woulld simply not need to cross-link.

Care to share your URL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea why, or even if your site has been banned. I suggest you read Google guidelines and info and make your site squeaky clean.</p>
<p>If you want to run multiple subdomains you can, go for it. I would always opt for one big site when the themes are related though. Makes much more sense, holds no risks, easier for customers, no cross-linking, better for SE and better for SEO and Webmasters etc etc. It&#8217;s only if the topics were totally unrelated that I would use sub domains, or different ones. Then, I woulld simply not need to cross-link.</p>
<p>Care to share your URL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gillman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/update-on-jagger-3-still-a-few-more-days/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=78#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>Spam reporting.

Is it appropriate to report an obvious link network that is manufacturing high PR among several sites as Spam?  Should I include Jagger2 in this report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam reporting.</p>
<p>Is it appropriate to report an obvious link network that is manufacturing high PR among several sites as Spam?  Should I include Jagger2 in this report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
