Comments on: Update Jagger: Contacting Google

By: SirSEO

SirSEO — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:53:34 +0000

Aaron! i really do listen to you!

By: Electric Golf Trolleys

Electric Golf Trolleys — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:36:49 +0000

I think it is important for Google to enable this spam function for people to report spamming websites. Google are getting better all the time with search relevancy.

By: Schraub-BAR

Schraub-BAR — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:27:04 +0000

Thanks Matt, i`ll do my part to get a few nervyish spam sites out of the SERPS. A lot of pages with good content and informations out there, but almost only e-commerce sites landing in the top search pages.

By: Praveen

Praveen — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:02:46 +0000

thank you very much matt. i knew few unknown tips in seo..

very nice

By: Harrogate SEO

Harrogate SEO — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:57:59 +0000

This guy is funny.

Basically it comes back to “create exciting unique content” and people will link to you naturally and you will not get penalized.

By: Stevie Ray Vaughan

Stevie Ray Vaughan — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:59:18 +0000

I agree. I’ve tried contacting Google too, with no luck on issues. I wish it were easier to get an answer sometimes.

By: Francis

Francis — Wed, 28 May 2008 09:39:17 +0000

Sorry forgot something regarding to the previous coment:

Of course we understand that a reinclusion could have happen
but it’s strange that this site is joining again the same top-positions with more than 10 keywords from the beginning of the reinclusion or experation of the imposition.

Matt, is this normal?

By: Francis

Francis — Wed, 28 May 2008 09:15:12 +0000

Hi Matt,

w w w . c o c h e s – b e l g i c a . c o m

This website was using constantly illegal practices to get top-rankings joining top-positions until google detected the fatal behavior.
Now we are wondering that this site is joining again top positions in the spanish site with exactly the same top-results like they did before when they used houndreds of repeated keywords splitted on 3 or for 4 websites linking to them.

Is it a cache problem and if not, how is it possible that google miss something like this?

By: Ryan

Ryan — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:44:10 +0000

Matt,

I spoke with you briefly the last day of SMX about reporting SPAM and quality issues for local.

Can you post the best way for us to communicate with the local team?

Check out http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS224US224&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=breast+augmentation,&near=San+Diego,+CA&fb=1&cid=0,0,9610073403769252562&sa=X&oi=local_result&resnum=1&ct=image

At the time of this post results 2-4 were the exact same address with spammy titles instead of real business names.

By: Francis

Francis — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:32:02 +0000

How some webmasters try to fool google : -(

I’ve found something,
which is one of those things what Matt Cutts and Google wants to avoid.

U can see here how one webmaster places link text in different sites with many, many keywords phrases ( many of them repeated ) all leading to his site.

It almost seems like as if the owner of the 1st site/blog mentioned below didn’t realized the unfair methods of the webmaster taking advantage of every single link text with keyword phrases all leading to his website in order to get good search results.

Every single outgoing link goes to the same website, lots of links with keyword phrases.

1.)
blog with too much outgoing links: xxxxxxxhttp://aziroet.com/hipotecamix/

2.)
site with too much outgoing links:
xxxxxxxhttp://lacomunidad.elpais.com/floren-martin/2007/9/12/-cuanto-cuesta-cambiar-nombre-coche-

The website we are talking about is currently joining top positions in the spanish search results.

Matt, what’s your opinion about that?