Comments on: Traffic Power case dismissed http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/ neat fun stuff Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Traffic Sale http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-109091 Traffic Sale Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:36:25 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-109091 i dont see why you keep erase my posts i dont see why you keep erase my posts

]]> By: Traffic Sale http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-109089 Traffic Sale Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:35:39 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-109089 traffic sale traffic sale

]]> By: Brian http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-22561 Brian Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:38:00 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-22561 How about this Alek? Having a bogus seo company create a bunch of doorway pages? $5000.00 On - going link campaing at the risk (threat) your rankings will drop? $7500.00 per year Loss of revenue when your site is banned from the google index for employing a bogus seo company. $300 000.00+ per year Lawyers to defend you after warning others about the impending doom to hire these jerks! $a lot! Having Matt Cutts speak in his official role as Head of spam department of Google after reviewing his post with Google lawyers and admitting you company has been removed from the index fro breeching the guidelings? Priceless! How about this Alek?

Having a bogus seo company create a bunch of doorway pages?

$5000.00

On – going link campaing at the risk (threat) your rankings will drop?

$7500.00 per year

Loss of revenue when your site is banned from the google index for employing a bogus seo company.

$300 000.00+ per year

Lawyers to defend you after warning others about the impending doom to hire these jerks!

$a lot!

Having Matt Cutts speak in his official role as Head of spam department of Google after reviewing his post with Google lawyers and admitting you company has been removed from the index fro breeching the guidelings?

Priceless!

]]> By: Dave http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21791 Dave Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:42:19 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21791 RE: When Googlebot finds such text, why not remove the offending URL from the index? IMO Google are putting their SE users first and hence NOT removing what otherwise maybe good content. Perhaps Google have already built in the ability to NOT credit most types of spam and simple ignore it. RE: When Googlebot finds such text, why not remove the offending URL from the index?

IMO Google are putting their SE users first and hence NOT removing what otherwise maybe good content. Perhaps Google have already built in the ability to NOT credit most types of spam and simple ignore it.

]]> By: bobmutch http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21781 bobmutch Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:08:44 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21781 Matt just want to say again it is big of you to take your time and set the record on the TP issue. I almost feel like you are one of us : ) Matt just want to say again it is big of you to take your time and set the record on the TP issue. I almost feel like you are one of us : )

]]> By: Harith http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21769 Harith Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:51:30 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21769 Bob & Adam Maybe Matt wish to suggest the folks at Google to change Google Webmaster Guidelines to Google Webmaster Commandments :D Bob & Adam

Maybe Matt wish to suggest the folks at Google to change

Google Webmaster Guidelines

to

Google Webmaster Commandments :D

]]> By: Adam Senour http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21768 Adam Senour Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:44:08 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21768 Don't you mean that the other way around, Bob? Don’t you mean that the other way around, Bob?

]]> By: Bob http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21761 Bob Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:45:09 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21761 Matt, you cannot violate guidelines. You can violate rules. Why not change the Google Webmaster Guidelines to Google Webmaster Rules? Matt, you cannot violate guidelines. You can violate rules. Why not change the Google Webmaster Guidelines to Google Webmaster Rules?

]]> By: Adam Senour http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21756 Adam Senour Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:23:58 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21756 That's a good point, Lori. Although, and my bad on this, I should have clarified that my thinking was about 2 steps down the road (although it would be nice to see it implemented sooner.) IrishWonder: http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:lhjKlo8v51IJ:www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-clean-house-before-press-releases/+%22Search+Engines+Web%22+site:mattcutts.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=30 The Google cache is a wonderful thing sometimes, isn't it? :) Seriously, if you want to get more examples, just punch in "Search Engines Web"--including quotes--and site:mattcutts.com. As much as I hate to give that guy any more attention than he deserves, this is a great way to relive all of the classic Search Engines Web moments. Maybe Matt will do a "clip show" post one day. :) That’s a good point, Lori.

Although, and my bad on this, I should have clarified that my thinking was about 2 steps down the road (although it would be nice to see it implemented sooner.)

IrishWonder:

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:lhjKlo8v51IJ:www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-clean-house-before-press-releases/+%22Search+Engines+Web%22+site:mattcutts.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=30

The Google cache is a wonderful thing sometimes, isn’t it? :)

Seriously, if you want to get more examples, just punch in “Search Engines Web”–including quotes–and site:mattcutts.com. As much as I hate to give that guy any more attention than he deserves, this is a great way to relive all of the classic Search Engines Web moments. Maybe Matt will do a “clip show” post one day. :)

]]> By: Lori Eldridg http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/traffic-power-case-dismissed/#comment-21742 Lori Eldridg Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:19:48 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=280#comment-21742 Adam Senor said: "The other thing I’d like to see done personally, and I’ll probably get a lot of flak for this one, is to see search engines base part of their results on user behaviour within the site on a strictly opt-in basis." This will probably only happen when the Google tool bar is available on all browsers and platforms. It's only available on Firefox for the Mac and I prefer using Safari. Adam Senor said:
“The other thing I’d like to see done personally, and I’ll probably get a lot of flak for this one, is to see search engines base part of their results on user behaviour within the site on a strictly opt-in basis.”

This will probably only happen when the Google tool bar is available on all browsers and platforms. It’s only available on Firefox for the Mac and I prefer using Safari.

]]>