<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The role of humans in Google search</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Marcus</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-361247</link> <dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-361247</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;Would humans be more or less empowered by an open search algorithm?&lt;/b&gt;I would like to hear more discussion on this topic at InfoWorld and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt Cutts&#039; blog&lt;/a&gt;.  Jonathan Ledergerber&#039;s article &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toptenglobal.com/blog/jonathan/humans-and-machines-in-the-search-equation&quot; title=&quot;Humans and Machines in the Search Equation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Humans and Machines in the Search Equation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is right on point when he refers to search that is powered by humans.Should search algorithms be open, with underlying logic exposed for public review?  If &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bing.com&quot; title=&quot;Bing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bing&lt;/a&gt; were to lead the way forward by opening up its search algorithm, would Yahoo! follow suit?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Would humans be more or less empowered by an open search algorithm?</b></p><p>I would like to hear more discussion on this topic at InfoWorld and in <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog" rel="nofollow">Matt Cutts&#8217; blog</a>.  Jonathan Ledergerber&#8217;s article <i><a href="http://www.toptenglobal.com/blog/jonathan/humans-and-machines-in-the-search-equation" title="Humans and Machines in the Search Equation" rel="nofollow">Humans and Machines in the Search Equation</a></i> is right on point when he refers to search that is powered by humans.</p><p>Should search algorithms be open, with underlying logic exposed for public review?  If <a href="http://www.bing.com" title="Bing" rel="nofollow">Bing</a> were to lead the way forward by opening up its search algorithm, would Yahoo! follow suit?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ganesh J. Acharya</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-189325</link> <dc:creator>Ganesh J. Acharya</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:01:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-189325</guid> <description>I think google.com&#039;s new introduction of SearchWiki is a good move. We will be surely watching the behavior of these new introduction. If Search Engine Results improve HATs off to google.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google.com&#8217;s new introduction of SearchWiki is a good move. We will be surely watching the behavior of these new introduction. If Search Engine Results improve HATs off to google.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-134760</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:44:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-134760</guid> <description>Hi Matt, For one website, how many keywords (max) you will give preference?By &lt;a href=&quot;sreejithsasidharan.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Sreejith sasidharan &lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> For one website, how many keywords (max) you will give preference?</p><p>By<br /> <a href="sreejithsasidharan.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"> Sreejith sasidharan </a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VainJustice</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-121931</link> <dc:creator>VainJustice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:49:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-121931</guid> <description>I was curious what you thought about the combination of the following:1 - It looks like Mahalo is just using vc money to pay humans to scrape your and wikipedia&#039;s database.So...2 - why is it that they seem to place Google Adwords in the middle of their content in a way that really blends in with everything else. They use the same hr, header style, and everything so the casual reader might just miss that it&#039;s an ad.I would think you were less interested in giving them a pass where other webmasters have been flogged.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious what you thought about the combination of the following:</p><p>1 &#8211; It looks like Mahalo is just using vc money to pay humans to scrape your and wikipedia&#8217;s database.</p><p>So&#8230;</p><p>2 &#8211; why is it that they seem to place Google Adwords in the middle of their content in a way that really blends in with everything else. They use the same hr, header style, and everything so the casual reader might just miss that it&#8217;s an ad.</p><p>I would think you were less interested in giving them a pass where other webmasters have been flogged.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Franklin Powers</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-120726</link> <dc:creator>Franklin Powers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:29:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-120726</guid> <description>Wow, same as last post for one of my sites. Pulls differently when searched via different ISP&#039;s. Can pull on comcast here go next do and pull on at&amp;t, results are different. Also see different results when pulled from different search engines that use googles results, but that is to be expected.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, same as last post for one of my sites. Pulls differently when searched via different ISP&#8217;s. Can pull on comcast here go next do and pull on at&amp;t, results are different. Also see different results when pulled from different search engines that use googles results, but that is to be expected.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Conor O'Nolan</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-118628</link> <dc:creator>Conor O'Nolan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:06:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-118628</guid> <description>A client called me today and asked why his site wasn&#039;t appearing in Google. I had created his humble site www.nbtrans.ie a few months earlier. So I opened google.ie and searched for noel brennan transport with the &#039;pages from Ireland&#039; option selected. Lo and behold, there he was, first up. That was news to him. So I searched with &#039;the web&#039; as the option and there he was again, first on the list.However, turns out he was using the google search from his ISP (Eircom.net). So I tried there, and sure, his site wasn&#039;t in the search results even though I used the same search words. You can see more of what I found on www.webwizards.ie/crippledgoogle.aspSo, does google deliberately or otherwise give different (older maybe) search results when the search comes from partner website and partner website is allowing unrestricted search?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A client called me today and asked why his site wasn&#8217;t appearing in<br /> Google. I had created his humble site <a href="http://www.nbtrans.ie" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbtrans.ie</a> a few months<br /> earlier. So I opened google.ie and searched for noel brennan transport<br /> with the &#8216;pages from Ireland&#8217; option selected. Lo and behold, there he<br /> was, first up. That was news to him. So I searched with &#8216;the web&#8217; as<br /> the option and there he was again, first on the list.</p><p>However, turns out he was using the google search from his ISP<br /> (Eircom.net). So I tried there, and sure, his site wasn&#8217;t in the<br /> search results even though I used the same search words. You can see<br /> more of what I found on <a href="http://www.webwizards.ie/crippledgoogle.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.webwizards.ie/crippledgoogle.asp</a></p><p>So, does google deliberately or otherwise give different (older maybe)<br /> search results when the search comes from partner website and partner<br /> website is allowing unrestricted search?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: indir</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-115704</link> <dc:creator>indir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-115704</guid> <description>Hi Matt this is a nice article from you, that talks about human experience. But, with centillions of websites online, I don’t think it is ever possible to ever figure out a method that with live humans sorting the list. It becomes necessary for a search engine to figure out methods those can sort the importance of a website based on user inputs those are automatically fetched.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt this is a nice article from you, that talks about human experience. But, with centillions of websites online, I don’t think it is ever possible to ever figure out a method that with live humans sorting the list. It becomes necessary for a search engine to figure out methods those can sort the importance of a website based on user inputs those are automatically fetched.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hakem</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114639</link> <dc:creator>hakem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:47:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114639</guid> <description>Thanks for the NYT article</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the NYT article</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oyun</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114519</link> <dc:creator>oyun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114519</guid> <description>I worked once for establishing ethical certification standards for affiliate programs vendors. At that time we suggested a “Certificated Badge”. yes thanks ;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked once for establishing ethical certification standards for affiliate programs vendors. At that time we suggested a “Certificated Badge”. yes thanks ;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doc Campbell</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114349</link> <dc:creator>Doc Campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-role-of-humans-in-google-search/#comment-114349</guid> <description>As the web has changed, search has changed, so to have I seen Google change. I for one am all for human interaction but to a certain degree. I think there is a fine line between the good and bad of too much interaction from a human presence in search results.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the web has changed, search has changed, so to have I seen Google change. I for one am all for human interaction but to a certain degree. I think there is a fine line between the good and bad of too much interaction from a human presence in search results.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-09 03:57:10 -->
