Comments on: snuffle snuffle http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/ neat fun stuff Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Steffen http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25662 Steffen Wed, 10 May 2006 07:07:55 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25662 Ralf i found 1 match and one with a eu domain , i think you mean Dupe Content we make on the same Day a redirect like matt talks about ?? Steffen Ralf i found 1 match and one with a eu domain , i think you mean Dupe Content
we make on the same Day a redirect like matt talks about ??

Steffen

]]> By: Ralf http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25601 Ralf Wed, 10 May 2006 00:08:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25601 Steffen, try copyscape.com and think about the results Steffen, try copyscape.com and think about the results

]]> By: Steffen http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25591 Steffen Tue, 09 May 2006 22:21:53 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25591 Harith this Article is Very Intresting i Think ;-) <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060504-083459" rel="nofollow">Google After "Big Daddy" Update </a> I hope This is not the Thing why google deletet our Site ;-) or they do ..... mmmm. Steffen Harith this Article is Very Intresting i Think ;-) Google After "Big Daddy" Update

I hope This is not the Thing why google deletet our Site ;-) or they do ….. mmmm.

Steffen

]]> By: Steffen http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25590 Steffen Tue, 09 May 2006 22:09:56 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25590 Harith , i do it like this thanks . We told our custumers the same then we have fullest picture available to them. That is the easyest way to communicate i think This post from GoogleGuy's and many others i do reading last 15 days . I am getting a Blogaholic i think . I search for an Answer , for a mistake in our Shopsystem but it looks very nice. so i have to search but no answer , it´s frustating. i search to some sites the do the same as we sell the same products but what they do ? They use things that you told me in your first post to remove . And they are still included !?!?!?!?!?!? steffen Harith , i do it like this thanks . We told our custumers the same then we have fullest picture available to them. That is the easyest way to communicate i think

This post from GoogleGuy’s and many others i do reading last 15 days . I am getting a Blogaholic i think . I search for an Answer , for a mistake in our Shopsystem but it looks very nice. so i have to search but no answer , it´s frustating. i search to some sites the do the same as we sell the same products but what they do ? They use things that you told me in your first post to remove . And they are still included !?!?!?!?!?!?

steffen

]]> By: Harith http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25589 Harith Tue, 09 May 2006 21:49:10 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25589 Steffen I see. Then you might wish to read what <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/29720-2-10.htm" rel="nofollow">GoogleGuy said</a> about the reinclusion requests: " I just found out something about reinclusion requests. If you send in a reinclusion request, you'll get an automatic reply with a tracking number in the subject. For best results, if you need to discuss that site in the future, it's best to reply to that email instead of mailing with new messages. Replying to the message keeps the same tracking number, so that the person who evaluates the site for reinclusion will get the complete correspondence about your site. If you send lots of disconnected emails so that you've got lots of different tracking numbers, the person who is evaluating the site for reinclusion won't have the fullest picture available to them. Just a tip for anyone who is doing a reinclusion request. " Steffen

I see.

Then you might wish to read what GoogleGuy said about the reinclusion requests:

” I just found out something about reinclusion requests. If you send in a reinclusion request, you’ll get an automatic reply with a tracking number in the subject. For best results, if you need to discuss that site in the future, it’s best to reply to that email instead of mailing with new messages. Replying to the message keeps the same tracking number, so that the person who evaluates the site for reinclusion will get the complete correspondence about your site. If you send lots of disconnected emails so that you’ve got lots of different tracking numbers, the person who is evaluating the site for reinclusion won’t have the fullest picture available to them. Just a tip for anyone who is doing a reinclusion request. “

]]> By: Steffen http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25588 Steffen Tue, 09 May 2006 21:36:24 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25588 Harith : our site is now i think 6 years in the index -30Days ;-) but iam wondering that we have a pr=4 but nothing is in the index . I wrote 5 or 6 friendly mails with question what is wrong , i wrote 2 reinclusion request´s . the answer was only standard mails thats it . Harith : our site is now i think 6 years in the index -30Days ;-) but iam wondering that we have a pr=4 but nothing is in the index . I wrote 5 or 6 friendly mails with question what is wrong , i wrote 2 reinclusion request´s . the answer was only standard mails thats it .

]]> By: Harith http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25583 Harith Tue, 09 May 2006 21:21:26 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25583 Steffen oooops! Is your site only 30+ days old? in that case you don't need to file a reinclusion request. You just need to wait for another month or so. Meanwhile maybe some already indexed site(s) shall link to your site. That will make things much easier for sure :) Steffen

oooops!

Is your site only 30+ days old? in that case you don’t need to file a reinclusion request.

You just need to wait for another month or so. Meanwhile maybe some already indexed site(s) shall link to your site. That will make things much easier for sure :)

]]> By: Steffen http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25582 Steffen Tue, 09 May 2006 21:11:02 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25582 Harith , thanks for your writing i do this now 30+ Days no redirects, no hidden text, no gateway pages , keyeordstuffing . For my technical unsdertanding is this site cleain like a virgin . Sorry for this english , but its going better day by day. steffen Harith , thanks for your writing i do this now 30+ Days no redirects, no hidden text, no gateway pages , keyeordstuffing . For my technical unsdertanding is this site cleain like a virgin . Sorry for this english , but its going better day by day.

steffen

]]> By: SpamHound http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25580 SpamHound Tue, 09 May 2006 21:07:49 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25580 Isn't a re-inlcusion request for if your completly out of the index. In my case, I'm not. Just when you search on the company name instead of being on the first page normally at #1 like we have for years, we suddenly show up on page 5 with the index page indented under another inside page. I guess I could do a re-inclusion and make up something I did, but the site is pretty clean. Also most of the pages are still indexed so they haven't been removed. Isn’t a re-inlcusion request for if your completly out of the index. In my case, I’m not. Just when you search on the company name instead of being on the first page normally at #1 like we have for years, we suddenly show up on page 5 with the index page indented under another inside page. I guess I could do a re-inclusion and make up something I did, but the site is pretty clean.

Also most of the pages are still indexed so they haven’t been removed.

]]> By: The Real Returns http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-25578 The Real Returns Tue, 09 May 2006 21:03:08 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=299#comment-25578 When are you going to tell us your Cisco story? When are you going to tell us your Cisco story?

]]>