Comments on: SES Chicago this week http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/ neat fun stuff Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:33:38 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: bizcento http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-95607 bizcento Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:18:11 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-95607 hi matt, please let us know after finding any diff in either google see the both url's as same or different like what Mr.catfish asked. We had such urls for trackbacks With Regards Ms.Thulasi SVNL. hi matt, please let us know after finding any diff in either google see the both url’s as same or different like what Mr.catfish asked. We had such urls for trackbacks

With Regards
Ms.Thulasi SVNL.

]]> By: SGD Networks http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-95389 SGD Networks Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:16:53 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-95389 Hello Matt, i am a serious lover of http://www.mattcutts.com and i had bundle of your notes, fine but we are in india and not having much money to visit chicago or london as you and people talking, why don't you visit india, you have a big fan over here. Try to make a trip to india once. thanks venkat Hello Matt,

i am a serious lover of http://www.mattcutts.com and i had bundle of your notes, fine but we are in india and not having much money to visit chicago or london as you and people talking, why don’t you visit india, you have a big fan over here. Try to make a trip to india once.

thanks
venkat

]]> By: Londoner http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-94809 Londoner Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:23:34 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-94809 Hi Matt, I have a couple of questions about Google Mobile Search. In particular, there seem to be some issues with Google listing websites in the Mobile Web index if they are already in the regular index, even if they are fully coded in Strict XHTML, which is mobile compliant. Could you shed some light on this? Hi Matt,

I have a couple of questions about Google Mobile Search. In particular, there seem to be some issues with Google listing websites in the Mobile Web index if they are already in the regular index, even if they are fully coded in Strict XHTML, which is mobile compliant.

Could you shed some light on this?

]]> By: Matt Cutts http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-91021 Matt Cutts Sat, 09 Dec 2006 03:55:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-91021 Catfish, I do believe we drop fragments or named anchors or whatever you call them (stuff after the '#') by truncating from the '#' onwards. I would feel free to run tests to see if using this method will get you what you want. Catfish, I do believe we drop fragments or named anchors or whatever you call them (stuff after the ‘#’) by truncating from the ‘#’ onwards. I would feel free to run tests to see if using this method will get you what you want.

]]> By: Catfish http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90937 Catfish Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:33:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90937 hi Matt. We missed you at SES Chicago. And you were definately right. It was freezing..lol. Especially for those of us from So Cal who are used to 70 degree weather right now. I wanted to bounce something off you I was talking to Adam Lasnik about at the show. It has been my experience (although I could be wrong) that Google doesn't index past a # character (anchor tag). If that's true, I would like to start using that character instead of the ? character for tracking codes on my clients links. I am working with some analytics vendors to see if they will enable their software to track those urls seperately (which they currently don't) but that would solve the problem of tracking codes causing duplicate content issues. Additionally, if Google sees www.google.com and www.google.com/#whatever as the same page, it would also consolidate the page rank and other signals correctly which is another problem with tracking codes. I was wondering if you knew if it was possible to enable Google analytics to track these two urls seperately. It is my understanding that they currently do not. Thanks and I would like to compliment Adam on his insightful presentations about best practices. Have a great weekend. Catfish hi Matt. We missed you at SES Chicago. And you were definately right. It was freezing..lol. Especially for those of us from So Cal who are used to 70 degree weather right now. I wanted to bounce something off you I was talking to Adam Lasnik about at the show. It has been my experience (although I could be wrong) that Google doesn’t index past a # character (anchor tag). If that’s true, I would like to start using that character instead of the ? character for tracking codes on my clients links. I am working with some analytics vendors to see if they will enable their software to track those urls seperately (which they currently don’t) but that would solve the problem of tracking codes causing duplicate content issues.

Additionally, if Google sees http://www.google.com and http://www.google.com/#whatever as the same page, it would also consolidate the page rank and other signals correctly which is another problem with tracking codes.

I was wondering if you knew if it was possible to enable Google analytics to track these two urls seperately. It is my understanding that they currently do not. Thanks and I would like to compliment Adam on his insightful presentations about best practices.

Have a great weekend.

Catfish

]]> By: Simon Heseltine http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90867 Simon Heseltine Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:40:37 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90867 Hmm, should I mention to Matt that when Danny asked the question "Raise your hand if you trust Google" (in response to a question about whether or not people wanted to give Google their analytics / conversion data) in the Evening with Danny Sullivan session, not all of the GoogleGang(TM) in the row behind me raised their hands? Nah, I'll not bother ;) Hmm, should I mention to Matt that when Danny asked the question “Raise your hand if you trust Google” (in response to a question about whether or not people wanted to give Google their analytics / conversion data) in the Evening with Danny Sullivan session, not all of the GoogleGang(TM) in the row behind me raised their hands? Nah, I’ll not bother ;)

]]> By: Jonathan Dingman http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90852 Jonathan Dingman Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:31:00 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90852 Matt: Any thoughts on this article I posted about sitemaps? <a href="http://www.ginside.com/2006/532/dropping-crawl-rates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ginside.com/2006/532/dropping-crawl-rates/</a> Matt:

Any thoughts on this article I posted about sitemaps?

http://www.ginside.com/2006/532/dropping-crawl-rates/

]]> By: woopa http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90846 woopa Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:03:48 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90846 That sounds pretty interesting for those who are a bit adicted to SEO :) Well good luck Matt take care That sounds pretty interesting for those who are a bit adicted to SEO :)
Well good luck Matt take care

]]> By: John Dale http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90773 John Dale Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:40:21 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90773 I was looking at Google Docs and was wondering the link value in publishing articles via google doc and interlinking them. Would these pages get a page rank and would the links be credited as inbound links? I was looking at Google Docs and was wondering the link value in publishing articles via google doc and interlinking them. Would these pages get a page rank and would the links be credited as inbound links?

]]> By: Manish http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90687 Manish Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:05:52 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ses-chicago-this-week/#comment-90687 Wow.... well Matt such a wonderful session will really gonna miss you! Take care Manish Pandey Wow…. well Matt such a wonderful session will really gonna miss you!

Take care

Manish Pandey

]]>