<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: SEO Mistakes: Nearly hidden text</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: J. Trevino</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-1068380</link> <dc:creator>J. Trevino</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:22:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-1068380</guid> <description>I guess, but why would anyone use EEEEEE?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, but why would anyone use EEEEEE?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hari</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-905554</link> <dc:creator>Hari</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:58:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-905554</guid> <description>Just a new way to spam :) As the technology and algorithm improves, so does the act of spamming.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a new way to spam <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> As the technology and algorithm improves, so does the act of spamming.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: karen mathews</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-870347</link> <dc:creator>karen mathews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:43:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-870347</guid> <description>I want to ask if white text and black background color theme would have any effect on SEO? many people use black text and black background.. so does it really matter?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to ask if white text and black background color theme would have any effect on SEO? many people use black text and black background.. so does it really matter?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ralph Smith</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-452978</link> <dc:creator>Ralph Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:02:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-452978</guid> <description>Im curious does google actually ignore text that is the same color as the back ground?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im curious does google actually ignore text that is the same color as the back ground?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: esmudo</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-381877</link> <dc:creator>esmudo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-381877</guid> <description>Hi, i need urgently to clarify the next with my programmer:He´s using in my site´s CSS (display: none,  visibility: hidden) for keywords which its font-size are less than one pixel. I want to remove this but he insists that if it is less than a pixel there´s no problem ...What can I do to make me understand? How can i prove he´s wrong? Could you help me? I don´t know what tell him when he says me I´m wrong...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /> i need urgently to clarify the next with my programmer:</p><p>He´s using in my site´s CSS (display: none,  visibility: hidden) for keywords which its font-size are less than one pixel. I want to remove this but he insists that if it is less than a pixel there´s no problem &#8230;</p><p>What can I do to make me understand? How can i prove he´s wrong?<br /> Could you help me? I don´t know what tell him when he says me I´m wrong&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: markcijo</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-141091</link> <dc:creator>markcijo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:14:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-141091</guid> <description>Hi Matt, I am gona digg this post again. Excuse me !!!I was just wondering what if I use Display= none in a case like http://www.weblinx.bizThey have written the script wisely and have hided the text that comes after a click. I would like to use the same for my website. I believe there is no issues if I do it like this. They are trying to hide the text for a click to save the space and add some effects. What do u say. Is that good method.. I mean a white hat technic?This is more interesting to me:cstring = ‘newresourceextranoted’; cdisplay = cstring.substring(16,17) +cstring.substring(17,18) + cstring.substring(0,1) + cstring.substring(19,20) ;Very logical !! lolMatt I am sorry, I don&#039;t know which of my comment you will see.. This is very urjent to me as I need to go ahead with my site development.. Sorry to post the same issue again.. But I am looking for your answer..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> I am gona digg this post again. Excuse me !!!</p><p>I was just wondering what if I use Display= none in a case like <a href="http://www.weblinx.biz" rel="nofollow">http://www.weblinx.biz</a></p><p>They have written the script wisely and have hided the text that comes after a click. I would like to use the same for my website. I believe there is no issues if I do it like this. They are trying to hide the text for a click to save the space and add some effects.<br /> What do u say.<br /> Is that good method.. I mean a white hat technic?</p><p>This is more interesting to me:</p><p>cstring = ‘newresourceextranoted’; cdisplay = cstring.substring(16,17) +</p><p>cstring.substring(17,18) + cstring.substring(0,1) + cstring.substring(19,20) ;</p><p>Very logical !! lol</p><p>Matt I am sorry, I don&#8217;t know which of my comment you will see.. This is very urjent to me as I need to go ahead with my site development.. Sorry to post the same issue again.. But I am looking for your answer..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Itsme</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-134361</link> <dc:creator>Itsme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:08:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-134361</guid> <description>Matt,I know this is a very old post, but I have a question about this topic that I think might be of benefit to other people as well as to me.On the top of each page on this site, is a three word title.  It is written in white text.  Right behind it, but offset by perhaps 1/8 of a character width is the same text in black.  This has a nice visual effect, creating a &quot;shadow-like&quot; look on the text.Would the text in black be considered hidden, since only about 1/8th of each character actually shows?  If this would be considered &quot;hiding&quot; could you consider changing the google algorithm, since text that is done this way is clearly not set up for the purposes of &quot;hiding&quot; anything from the users, but instead intended to enhance the user&#039;s viewing experience.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p><p>I know this is a very old post, but I have a question about this topic that I think might be of benefit to other people as well as to me.</p><p>On the top of each page on this site, is a three word title.  It is written in white text.  Right behind it, but offset by perhaps 1/8 of a character width is the same text in black.  This has a nice visual effect, creating a &#8220;shadow-like&#8221; look on the text.</p><p>Would the text in black be considered hidden, since only about 1/8th of each character actually shows?  If this would be considered &#8220;hiding&#8221; could you consider changing the google algorithm, since text that is done this way is clearly not set up for the purposes of &#8220;hiding&#8221; anything from the users, but instead intended to enhance the user&#8217;s viewing experience.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arnaud</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-120646</link> <dc:creator>Arnaud</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-120646</guid> <description>Hi Matt, I was wondering if on the matter of CSS-hidden text and specially either text-indent or pos:absolute with left-999em (re: http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/) you would have more up to date news about Google considering it as spam or not? (this discussion was in 2005 after all) Same issue here: I have skip links, plus hx&#039;s (headers that are not in the initial visual layout of the page but need to be there for screen-readers and non-CSS visitors and also for my document to be well formed -no point having h2&#039;s or h3&#039; if there is no h1 etc.) and &#039;back to top&#039; links not visible by most visitors but there for Jaws, WAP users etc.thank you very much to enlighten us.Arnaud</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> I was wondering if on the matter of CSS-hidden text and specially either text-indent or pos:absolute with left-999em (re: <a href="http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/" rel="nofollow">http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200510/google_seo_and_using_css_to_hide_text/</a>)<br /> you would have more up to date news about Google considering it as spam or not? (this discussion was in 2005 after all)<br /> Same issue here: I have skip links, plus hx&#8217;s (headers that are not in the initial visual layout of the page but need to be there for screen-readers and non-CSS visitors and also for my document to be well formed -no point having h2&#8242;s or h3&#8242; if there is no h1 etc.) and &#8216;back to top&#8217; links not visible by most visitors but there for Jaws, WAP users etc.</p><p>thank you very much to enlighten us.</p><p>Arnaud</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: szerako</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-120370</link> <dc:creator>szerako</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:39:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-120370</guid> <description>How come this hidden text cheating method is not screened and penalized by Google? If correct webmasters follow the guidelines and perform worse because of such cheaters - I think google should track down the gamblers and do something about it. In 2008 one would think this is the norm...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come this hidden text cheating method is not screened and penalized by Google? If correct webmasters follow the guidelines and perform worse because of such cheaters &#8211; I think google should track down the gamblers and do something about it. In 2008 one would think this is the norm&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Affiliate marketing Introduction</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-nearly-hidden-text/#comment-119887</link> <dc:creator>Affiliate marketing Introduction</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:30:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=102#comment-119887</guid> <description>Stepping away from our usual disapproval of spamming and black hat SEO, hats off to the guy who built the site. Show some imaginaion</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stepping away from our usual disapproval of spamming and black hat SEO, hats off to the guy who built the site. Show some imaginaion</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-09 03:16:08 -->
