<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Talk like a Googler: parts of a url</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Thaddee Tyl</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-890075</link> <dc:creator>Thaddee Tyl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:48:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-890075</guid> <description>What Robert Brewer said back in 2007 is right.Tantek Celik mentioned how hard it is these days to determine what everyone is talking about when dealing with URLs &lt;a href=&quot;http://tantek.com/2011/238/b1/many-ways-slice-url-name-pieces&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in a recent post&lt;/a&gt;.It would be nice of you to edit your post to match RFC documents. &quot;http&quot; is just the scheme; the protocol would be &quot;http:&quot;. Likewise, &quot;parameters&quot; are not mentioned in standard documents; what you mean is &quot;search&quot; (DOM); but ideally, you should talk about the &quot;query&quot;, which doesn&#039;t include the leading question mark. Finally, &quot;#00h02m30s&quot; isn&#039;t a fragment; it is either a fragmentId (URL RFC), a hash (DOM), or &quot;00h02m30s&quot; is the fragment.I know your editing the post won&#039;t restore the Tower of Babel, but it might at least help to get in a place where each name has only one meaning.My preferred combination is HTTP&#039;s ( scheme / host / port / path / query / fragment ), because it strips down the URL to  the least number of characters; but any combination that uses terms found in RFCs and W3C documents is welcome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Robert Brewer said back in 2007 is right.</p><p>Tantek Celik mentioned how hard it is these days to determine what everyone is talking about when dealing with URLs <a href="http://tantek.com/2011/238/b1/many-ways-slice-url-name-pieces" rel="nofollow">in a recent post</a>.</p><p>It would be nice of you to edit your post to match RFC documents. &#8220;http&#8221; is just the scheme; the protocol would be &#8220;http:&#8221;. Likewise, &#8220;parameters&#8221; are not mentioned in standard documents; what you mean is &#8220;search&#8221; (DOM); but ideally, you should talk about the &#8220;query&#8221;, which doesn&#8217;t include the leading question mark. Finally, &#8220;#00h02m30s&#8221; isn&#8217;t a fragment; it is either a fragmentId (URL RFC), a hash (DOM), or &#8220;00h02m30s&#8221; is the fragment.</p><p>I know your editing the post won&#8217;t restore the Tower of Babel, but it might at least help to get in a place where each name has only one meaning.</p><p>My preferred combination is HTTP&#8217;s ( scheme / host / port / path / query / fragment ), because it strips down the URL to  the least number of characters; but any combination that uses terms found in RFCs and W3C documents is welcome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OCM</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-799298</link> <dc:creator>OCM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-799298</guid> <description>please is it possible to have a SUBDOMAIN of another subdomain.... meaning...www.subdomain1.subdomain2.domain.edu.uk. please how do i go about it if it is possible?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please is it possible to have a SUBDOMAIN of another subdomain&#8230;.<br /> meaning&#8230;</p><p><a href="http://www.subdomain1.subdomain2.domain.edu.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.subdomain1.subdomain2.domain.edu.uk</a>.<br /> please how do i go about it if it is possible?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nevil Darukhanawala</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-775129</link> <dc:creator>Nevil Darukhanawala</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:20:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-775129</guid> <description>Does google consider .co as columbia or is it treated like .com I have a client who has a .co address.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does google consider .co as columbia or is it treated like .com I have a client who has a .co address.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miguel Ángel</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-719038</link> <dc:creator>Miguel Ángel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:56:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-719038</guid> <description>So dynamic and static URLs are indexed with the same priority?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So dynamic and static URLs are indexed with the same priority?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: camilo</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-435549</link> <dc:creator>camilo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-435549</guid> <description>Hi Matt, how has this post been impacted by the latest updates by Google with in-site links? I was reading a post about using named anchors on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/using-named-anchors-to-identify.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google blog in September&lt;/a&gt; that pretty much says # characters are now ok to use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, how has this post been impacted by the latest updates by Google with in-site links? I was reading a post about using named anchors on the <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/using-named-anchors-to-identify.html" rel="nofollow">Google blog in September</a> that pretty much says # characters are now ok to use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: recep</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-259317</link> <dc:creator>recep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:04:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-259317</guid> <description>l understood what u mean but l am confisued about how to remove old urls from search engines, if l configute the .htaccess and redirect all old urls via htaccess or make costum 301 or 404 pages will stop duplicate content, but what about the indexed dublicates from different google datasencers? l still have many iidot links comes from different google datacenters. well nice done, thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>l understood what u mean but l am confisued about how to remove old urls from search engines, if l configute the .htaccess and redirect all old urls via htaccess or make costum 301 or 404 pages will stop duplicate content, but what about the indexed dublicates from different google datasencers?<br /> l still have many iidot links comes from different google datacenters.<br /> well nice done, thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marketing Preston</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-253234</link> <dc:creator>Marketing Preston</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:19:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-253234</guid> <description>Hello Matt,Thanks for the breakdown, I remember having to sit through a lecture on this! It&#039;s definately not the most riveting of topics!I just thought I&#039;d clarify that both static and dynamic url&#039;s can contain question marks. I know that some people may read this article and think that a question mark within the url almost certainly means that the url is dynamic, when this is not the case.Take the two sites:http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/services.asp?service_no=12 http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/index-inclusionYou may be thinking that the first is a dynamic website and the second a static one, but it is possible and often the case that static url&#039;s can be database driven and dynamic looking url&#039;s can be static.Wordpress and other blogging platforms that are database driven have dynamic url&#039;s but because there is a facility to edit them, it is impossible to detect just by looking at the url itself.For example a page on our website...http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/seo/free-website-analysis...is a dynamic url, although it would appear to be static using the ? mark rule. I just thought I&#039;d clear that one up.Nick</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Matt,</p><p>Thanks for the breakdown, I remember having to sit through a lecture on this! It&#8217;s definately not the most riveting of topics!</p><p>I just thought I&#8217;d clarify that both static and dynamic url&#8217;s can contain question marks. I know that some people may read this article and think that a question mark within the url almost certainly means that the url is dynamic, when this is not the case.</p><p>Take the two sites:</p><p><a href="http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/services.asp?service_no=12" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/services.asp?service_no=12</a><br /> <a href="http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/index-inclusion" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/index-inclusion</a></p><p>You may be thinking that the first is a dynamic website and the second a static one, but it is possible and often the case that static url&#8217;s can be database driven and dynamic looking url&#8217;s can be static.</p><p>WordPress and other blogging platforms that are database driven have dynamic url&#8217;s but because there is a facility to edit them, it is impossible to detect just by looking at the url itself.</p><p>For example a page on our website&#8230;</p><p><a href="http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/seo/free-website-analysis" rel="nofollow">http://www.seo-angels.co.uk/seo/free-website-analysis</a></p><p>&#8230;is a dynamic url, although it would appear to be static using the ? mark rule. I just thought I&#8217;d clear that one up.</p><p>Nick</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: scottie</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-228732</link> <dc:creator>scottie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:48:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-228732</guid> <description>what about sub.sub.exaple.com domains...how could i do that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about sub.sub.exaple.com domains&#8230;how could i do that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leon</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-208909</link> <dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-208909</guid> <description>Hi Matt, We knew the difference between subdomain and top domain from your blog. and how&#039;s about &quot;http://name.subdomain.a.com&quot; vs &quot;http://subdomain.a.com/name/&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> We knew the difference between subdomain and top domain from your blog.<br /> and how&#8217;s about &#8220;http://name.subdomain.a.com&#8221; vs &#8220;http://subdomain.a.com/name/&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEODEO</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-137130</link> <dc:creator>SEODEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:19:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/#comment-137130</guid> <description>I have read that Google loves static URLs. But I am NOT rewriting my dynamic url’s into static. I don´t want to loose my ranking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read that Google loves static URLs. But I am NOT rewriting my dynamic url’s into static. I don´t want to loose my ranking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-09 02:48:01 -->
