<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Send. More. Spam reports.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-455129</link>
		<dc:creator>Bstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-455129</guid>
		<description>Alot of folks are getting away with spam and blackhat tactics, while it seems like google isn&#039;t doing anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alot of folks are getting away with spam and blackhat tactics, while it seems like google isn&#8217;t doing anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-449630</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-449630</guid>
		<description>try this search:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22superb+value+website+design+service%22&amp;start=200&amp;sa=N

when are Google going to clamp down on this type of spam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try this search:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22superb+value+website+design+service%22&amp;start=200&amp;sa=N" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22superb+value+website+design+service%22&amp;start=200&amp;sa=N</a></p>
<p>when are Google going to clamp down on this type of spam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-425198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-425198</guid>
		<description>I have noticed this as well, I do agree with Julio Marketing de Sites~ it&#039;s all about money. As long as money is being made then google can care less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed this as well, I do agree with Julio Marketing de Sites~ it&#8217;s all about money. As long as money is being made then google can care less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-151763</link>
		<dc:creator>matt waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-151763</guid>
		<description>This site www.touchlocal.com is  domination google results here in the UK and stopping small industry sites from having a chance.

They have a domain for every city in the UK and Ireland  with the same design

www. touch (city name).com

They must have over 500 domain’s all with the heading touchlocal.com with the same design 

See your yourself:
Google Query:  asbestos removal contractors
Result page:  http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N

Look for Touch (cityname) .com on the first 5 pages

can you look into it Matt please, lots of UK small business not happy about this sites results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site <a href="http://www.touchlocal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.touchlocal.com</a> is  domination google results here in the UK and stopping small industry sites from having a chance.</p>
<p>They have a domain for every city in the UK and Ireland  with the same design</p>
<p>www. touch (city name).com</p>
<p>They must have over 500 domain’s all with the heading touchlocal.com with the same design </p>
<p>See your yourself:<br />
Google Query:  asbestos removal contractors<br />
Result page:  <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N</a></p>
<p>Look for Touch (cityname) .com on the first 5 pages</p>
<p>can you look into it Matt please, lots of UK small business not happy about this sites results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-131660</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-131660</guid>
		<description>Hello John,

I agree with your Experts Exchange example. There is a bit of discussion about this already on the &quot;what spam should we target&quot;.

@Julio
Quote:
They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.

I don&#039;t think that&#039;s really fair. What about quality scores etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>I agree with your Experts Exchange example. There is a bit of discussion about this already on the &#8220;what spam should we target&#8221;.</p>
<p>@Julio<br />
Quote:<br />
They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s really fair. What about quality scores etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Willson</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-115257</link>
		<dc:creator>John Willson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-115257</guid>
		<description>How come the big boys get away with cloaking.

Such as www.experts-exchange.com.

example page show that you must be a member. but google cache shows content.
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html

if you search for: &quot;You may try Kinetic Fusion&quot; in google you get http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html on second page, but search term is only visible in google&#039;s cache. This is not in my best interest, which google preaches about to webmasters.

Is cloaking now accepted by google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the big boys get away with cloaking.</p>
<p>Such as <a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com</a>.</p>
<p>example page show that you must be a member. but google cache shows content.<br />
<a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html</a></p>
<p>if you search for: &#8220;You may try Kinetic Fusion&#8221; in google you get <a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html</a> on second page, but search term is only visible in google&#8217;s cache. This is not in my best interest, which google preaches about to webmasters.</p>
<p>Is cloaking now accepted by google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: healthprotein</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-114631</link>
		<dc:creator>healthprotein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-114631</guid>
		<description>I did a search in our Niche and a site, which has been out of commission for a few months, is still showing up in the listings
http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a search in our Niche and a site, which has been out of commission for a few months, is still showing up in the listings<br />
<a href="http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity" rel="nofollow">http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Marketing de Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-112752</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Marketing de Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-112752</guid>
		<description>Truth is Google created a monster which is feed by useless websites with stolen content and spam that pop up every day to collect on adsense. They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth is Google created a monster which is feed by useless websites with stolen content and spam that pop up every day to collect on adsense. They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan ainsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-107085</link>
		<dc:creator>alan ainsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-107085</guid>
		<description>just submited another one for this page http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm which comes up in the top ten #1 for &quot;Tampa Bay Area Search Engine optimizing&quot; who have stolen original content from my site and used it on both this site and this site http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm what ever happened to google only indexing original unique content?

Maybe google should concider adding somthing to the webmasters tools where webmaster can submit their original content for each page to stop other sites stealing said content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just submited another one for this page <a href="http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm</a> which comes up in the top ten #1 for &#8220;Tampa Bay Area Search Engine optimizing&#8221; who have stolen original content from my site and used it on both this site and this site <a href="http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm</a> what ever happened to google only indexing original unique content?</p>
<p>Maybe google should concider adding somthing to the webmasters tools where webmaster can submit their original content for each page to stop other sites stealing said content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan ainsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-107084</link>
		<dc:creator>alan ainsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-107084</guid>
		<description>Why bother with the spam report? everytime I have done it the sites never get removed and it is clear they are breaking the rules. This is very discouraging for white hat SEOs like myself who tries to follow the rules and makes sure my clients do or they get dumped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother with the spam report? everytime I have done it the sites never get removed and it is clear they are breaking the rules. This is very discouraging for white hat SEOs like myself who tries to follow the rules and makes sure my clients do or they get dumped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
