<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Send. More. Spam reports.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt waterman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-151763</link>
		<dc:creator>matt waterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-151763</guid>
		<description>This site www.touchlocal.com is  domination google results here in the UK and stopping small industry sites from having a chance.

They have a domain for every city in the UK and Ireland  with the same design

www. touch (city name).com

They must have over 500 domain’s all with the heading touchlocal.com with the same design 

See your yourself:
Google Query:  asbestos removal contractors
Result page:  http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N

Look for Touch (cityname) .com on the first 5 pages

can you look into it Matt please, lots of UK small business not happy about this sites results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site <a href="http://www.touchlocal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.touchlocal.com</a> is  domination google results here in the UK and stopping small industry sites from having a chance.</p>
<p>They have a domain for every city in the UK and Ireland  with the same design</p>
<p>www. touch (city name).com</p>
<p>They must have over 500 domain’s all with the heading touchlocal.com with the same design </p>
<p>See your yourself:<br />
Google Query:  asbestos removal contractors<br />
Result page:  <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;pwst=1&amp;q=asbestos+removal+contractors&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N</a></p>
<p>Look for Touch (cityname) .com on the first 5 pages</p>
<p>can you look into it Matt please, lots of UK small business not happy about this sites results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-131660</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-131660</guid>
		<description>Hello John,

I agree with your Experts Exchange example. There is a bit of discussion about this already on the &quot;what spam should we target&quot;.

@Julio
Quote:
They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.

I don&#039;t think that&#039;s really fair. What about quality scores etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>I agree with your Experts Exchange example. There is a bit of discussion about this already on the &#8220;what spam should we target&#8221;.</p>
<p>@Julio<br />
Quote:<br />
They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s really fair. What about quality scores etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Willson</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-115257</link>
		<dc:creator>John Willson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-115257</guid>
		<description>How come the big boys get away with cloaking.

Such as www.experts-exchange.com.

example page show that you must be a member. but google cache shows content.
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html

if you search for: &quot;You may try Kinetic Fusion&quot; in google you get http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html on second page, but search term is only visible in google&#039;s cache. This is not in my best interest, which google preaches about to webmasters.

Is cloaking now accepted by google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the big boys get away with cloaking.</p>
<p>Such as <a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com</a>.</p>
<p>example page show that you must be a member. but google cache shows content.<br />
<a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html</a></p>
<p>if you search for: &#8220;You may try Kinetic Fusion&#8221; in google you get <a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Q_20948014.html</a> on second page, but search term is only visible in google&#8217;s cache. This is not in my best interest, which google preaches about to webmasters.</p>
<p>Is cloaking now accepted by google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: healthprotein</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-114631</link>
		<dc:creator>healthprotein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-114631</guid>
		<description>I did a search in our Niche and a site, which has been out of commission for a few months, is still showing up in the listings
http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a search in our Niche and a site, which has been out of commission for a few months, is still showing up in the listings<br />
<a href="http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity" rel="nofollow">http://healthprotein.info/food/an-epidemic-of-obesity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Marketing de Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-112752</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Marketing de Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-112752</guid>
		<description>Truth is Google created a monster which is feed by useless websites with stolen content and spam that pop up every day to collect on adsense. They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth is Google created a monster which is feed by useless websites with stolen content and spam that pop up every day to collect on adsense. They do collect money from these sites so they cannot complain about the spam nowdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan ainsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-107085</link>
		<dc:creator>alan ainsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-107085</guid>
		<description>just submited another one for this page http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm which comes up in the top ten #1 for &quot;Tampa Bay Area Search Engine optimizing&quot; who have stolen original content from my site and used it on both this site and this site http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm what ever happened to google only indexing original unique content?

Maybe google should concider adding somthing to the webmasters tools where webmaster can submit their original content for each page to stop other sites stealing said content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just submited another one for this page <a href="http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm</a> which comes up in the top ten #1 for &#8220;Tampa Bay Area Search Engine optimizing&#8221; who have stolen original content from my site and used it on both this site and this site <a href="http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.virext.com/searchengineseo.htm</a> what ever happened to google only indexing original unique content?</p>
<p>Maybe google should concider adding somthing to the webmasters tools where webmaster can submit their original content for each page to stop other sites stealing said content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan ainsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-107084</link>
		<dc:creator>alan ainsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-107084</guid>
		<description>Why bother with the spam report? everytime I have done it the sites never get removed and it is clear they are breaking the rules. This is very discouraging for white hat SEOs like myself who tries to follow the rules and makes sure my clients do or they get dumped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother with the spam report? everytime I have done it the sites never get removed and it is clear they are breaking the rules. This is very discouraging for white hat SEOs like myself who tries to follow the rules and makes sure my clients do or they get dumped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSgold</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-104928</link>
		<dc:creator>RSgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-104928</guid>
		<description>I imagine the results would be much the same.I think this may be beyond the normal spam report facility and I would like to divulge the names etc but not in the public domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine the results would be much the same.I think this may be beyond the normal spam report facility and I would like to divulge the names etc but not in the public domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-99082</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-99082</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I think I have found a network of domains that are being used for click fraud, the perpertrators doing this use many domains including a domain similar to ours. A combination of flash redirects and css cloaking are used and most names have a whois connection.

There are hundreds of domains being used and many are listed in Google.

I am concerned because the name that is similar to ours may cause confusion and I would like to get this sorted out without risk to ourselves, I think this may be beyond the normal spam report facility and I would like to divulge the names etc but not in the public domain.

What do you suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I think I have found a network of domains that are being used for click fraud, the perpertrators doing this use many domains including a domain similar to ours. A combination of flash redirects and css cloaking are used and most names have a whois connection.</p>
<p>There are hundreds of domains being used and many are listed in Google.</p>
<p>I am concerned because the name that is similar to ours may cause confusion and I would like to get this sorted out without risk to ourselves, I think this may be beyond the normal spam report facility and I would like to divulge the names etc but not in the public domain.</p>
<p>What do you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evden eve nakliyat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/send-more-spam-reports/#comment-97426</link>
		<dc:creator>evden eve nakliyat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=241#comment-97426</guid>
		<description>Hi
Im Mary
As luck would have it, Mort, Mort’s Mom and myself all use Tomsastrblog for our blogs. This was handy because it meant I could use the exact same code for all of them - the only downside is that they perhaps aren’t as representative of all blogs everywhere as they could be, though the techniques I used would work for any blogging system, and I imagine the results would be much the same. But I suppose you’re all screaming to hear just what these cunning things I did are. You are, right? Yes, I thought you were.
Thank s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Im Mary<br />
As luck would have it, Mort, Mort’s Mom and myself all use Tomsastrblog for our blogs. This was handy because it meant I could use the exact same code for all of them &#8211; the only downside is that they perhaps aren’t as representative of all blogs everywhere as they could be, though the techniques I used would work for any blogging system, and I imagine the results would be much the same. But I suppose you’re all screaming to hear just what these cunning things I did are. You are, right? Yes, I thought you were.<br />
Thank s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
