<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search results in search results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-918666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-918666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldnt you want your Search results being indexed??? Bigger the site the better???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldnt you want your Search results being indexed??? Bigger the site the better???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-877280</link>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-877280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most popular classified ads in the Philippines sulit.com.ph is spamming Google search results. When I search a certain keyword, sulit.com.ph search results appear in Google search results for many times. Did you ever consider to inspect this site?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular classified ads in the Philippines sulit.com.ph is spamming Google search results. When I search a certain keyword, sulit.com.ph search results appear in Google search results for many times. Did you ever consider to inspect this site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Marttins</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-839783</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Marttins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-839783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Matt,

Could you please tell me why Google doesn&#039;t penalize the websites that index their own search results? I&#039;m sick and tired of these kind of websites, and the problem is that they appear on the top 3 search results in Google, for many keywords, without any content whatsoever.

Here is an example from google search results:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acasapariurilor.net%2Fsearch

40.000 indexed spam pages, and this is not a unique case.. 

Thank you for your time,
Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Could you please tell me why Google doesn&#8217;t penalize the websites that index their own search results? I&#8217;m sick and tired of these kind of websites, and the problem is that they appear on the top 3 search results in Google, for many keywords, without any content whatsoever.</p>
<p>Here is an example from google search results:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acasapariurilor.net%2Fsearch" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acasapariurilor.net%2Fsearch</a></p>
<p>40.000 indexed spam pages, and this is not a unique case.. </p>
<p>Thank you for your time,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan F. Aguilar</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-713349</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan F. Aguilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-713349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Matt, 
What about cassified personals or comparative items on Internal search results. 

We have a 2 debates (the one that lead us to your amazing and on the spot blog): 

Debate 1: 
Some people enjoy having a handfull of results in one page. If your shopping or comparing groups of items, potential partners or baseball players, a results page is more apealing. You get to relevant info faster and you get to compare it. 

Other people argue that Google is that &quot;Comparative&quot; list, and that they prefer to go to the individual ad. 

Debate 2:
Another problem that arises from &quot;search results in search results&quot; comes from the dinamic nature of result pages. Let me illustrate: On &quot;Monday&quot;,  result page # 1 will display x,y and z results, and google indexes this URL (Result page 1), as having that information. 

On Tuesday, of the following week, result page #1 will have U, V, W, results, UVW pushed  X,Y and Z to resutls page # 2. Results indexed in google, on result page #1 will have been false. thus increasing bounce rate on the page. 

Posible solutions: 
a) Put no-index tags on result pages.
b) Invert result pagination, giving each set of results a permanent URL, that wont change with time.   

What do you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Matt,<br />
What about cassified personals or comparative items on Internal search results. </p>
<p>We have a 2 debates (the one that lead us to your amazing and on the spot blog): </p>
<p>Debate 1:<br />
Some people enjoy having a handfull of results in one page. If your shopping or comparing groups of items, potential partners or baseball players, a results page is more apealing. You get to relevant info faster and you get to compare it. </p>
<p>Other people argue that Google is that &#8220;Comparative&#8221; list, and that they prefer to go to the individual ad. </p>
<p>Debate 2:<br />
Another problem that arises from &#8220;search results in search results&#8221; comes from the dinamic nature of result pages. Let me illustrate: On &#8220;Monday&#8221;,  result page # 1 will display x,y and z results, and google indexes this URL (Result page 1), as having that information. </p>
<p>On Tuesday, of the following week, result page #1 will have U, V, W, results, UVW pushed  X,Y and Z to resutls page # 2. Results indexed in google, on result page #1 will have been false. thus increasing bounce rate on the page. </p>
<p>Posible solutions:<br />
a) Put no-index tags on result pages.<br />
b) Invert result pagination, giving each set of results a permanent URL, that wont change with time.   </p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-591180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-591180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems that Google doesn&#039;t follow it&#039;s own advice. In the right sidebar of http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=159501 there is a link to http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/search.py?query=how+to+add+tracking which is a search result. And that search result page is not noindexed or disallowed because I found the page from Google: http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsupport%2Fanalytics%2Fbin%2Fsearch.py%3Fquery%3Dhow%2Bto%2Badd%2Btracking&amp;rls=com.microsoft:fi&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;startIndex=&amp;startPage=1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that Google doesn&#8217;t follow it&#8217;s own advice. In the right sidebar of <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=159501" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=159501</a> there is a link to <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/search.py?query=how+to+add+tracking" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/search.py?query=how+to+add+tracking</a> which is a search result. And that search result page is not noindexed or disallowed because I found the page from Google: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsupport%2Fanalytics%2Fbin%2Fsearch.py%3Fquery%3Dhow%2Bto%2Badd%2Btracking&#038;rls=com.microsoft:fi&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;startIndex=&#038;startPage=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsupport%2Fanalytics%2Fbin%2Fsearch.py%3Fquery%3Dhow%2Bto%2Badd%2Btracking&#038;rls=com.microsoft:fi&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;startIndex=&#038;startPage=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-418390</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-418390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been wondering for the past two years what&#039;s the assumed value of having results from people &quot;search engines&quot; aka scrapers in Google&#039;s SERPs? See e.g. http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.123people.com%2Fs%2Fmatt%2Bcutts.

Now, what&#039;s Google&#039;s stance on showing SERPs in SERPs when all the vertical results are expected to show up in Google&#039;s own unified SERP anyhow?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering for the past two years what&#8217;s the assumed value of having results from people &#8220;search engines&#8221; aka scrapers in Google&#8217;s SERPs? See e.g. <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.123people.com%2Fs%2Fmatt%2Bcutts" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.123people.com%2Fs%2Fmatt%2Bcutts</a>.</p>
<p>Now, what&#8217;s Google&#8217;s stance on showing SERPs in SERPs when all the vertical results are expected to show up in Google&#8217;s own unified SERP anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanos</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-378565</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-378565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robots.txt files are very useful for the following reasons too: 

Saving Bandwidth: Search engine spider robots and web robots visit often our web sites to index changes in our content. We can restrict access to certain directories that we do not want crawlers to access.

Cleans Up Your Logs: After submitting your web site to the search engines than the spider robots will be searching for your robots.txt file. Every time a robot searches for this file and it does not find one, it generates a ‘404 File Not Found’ error. Adding the file to your root directory will help eliminate these errors and boost your rankings.

Online Protection: The search engine robots, unless instructed otherwise by your robots.txt file, will attempt to index as much of your web site as possible. This means that they will also access file on the serves that they should not have access to.

Avoid Unwanted Indexing: If a part of you web site is still being developed than you might want to prevent crawlers from indexing your content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robots.txt files are very useful for the following reasons too: </p>
<p>Saving Bandwidth: Search engine spider robots and web robots visit often our web sites to index changes in our content. We can restrict access to certain directories that we do not want crawlers to access.</p>
<p>Cleans Up Your Logs: After submitting your web site to the search engines than the spider robots will be searching for your robots.txt file. Every time a robot searches for this file and it does not find one, it generates a ‘404 File Not Found’ error. Adding the file to your root directory will help eliminate these errors and boost your rankings.</p>
<p>Online Protection: The search engine robots, unless instructed otherwise by your robots.txt file, will attempt to index as much of your web site as possible. This means that they will also access file on the serves that they should not have access to.</p>
<p>Avoid Unwanted Indexing: If a part of you web site is still being developed than you might want to prevent crawlers from indexing your content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mevans05</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-334086</link>
		<dc:creator>mevans05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-334086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with Jeremy CEO @ Yelp. If a site&#039;s search results page has valuable, unique (i.e. not scraped from other sites) content that satisfies a searcher&#039;s intent, then why would it be considered unworthy for Google search results?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with Jeremy CEO @ Yelp. If a site&#8217;s search results page has valuable, unique (i.e. not scraped from other sites) content that satisfies a searcher&#8217;s intent, then why would it be considered unworthy for Google search results?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-184884</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-184884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this page looking for info on &quot;cooks.com search spam&quot;.  Is Google finally going to do something about this website?  Every single time I search for a recipe online, I hit this spammy Cooks.com website.  Half the time the site isn&#039;t active, and when I can actually access a page, it&#039;s scraped search results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this page looking for info on &#8220;cooks.com search spam&#8221;.  Is Google finally going to do something about this website?  Every single time I search for a recipe online, I hit this spammy Cooks.com website.  Half the time the site isn&#8217;t active, and when I can actually access a page, it&#8217;s scraped search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dipali</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-123680</link>
		<dc:creator>Dipali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/search-results-in-search-results/#comment-123680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Matt,

 i have query regarding Google Debuts &quot;Search Within A Site&quot; Search Box Feature. my site has good back link and page rank. but when i am searching regarding my site but i cuodunt find this type of feature for my site?

can u tell me whats the criteria for search within A site search box?


Regards,
Dipali]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Matt,</p>
<p> i have query regarding Google Debuts &#8220;Search Within A Site&#8221; Search Box Feature. my site has good back link and page rank. but when i am searching regarding my site but i cuodunt find this type of feature for my site?</p>
<p>can u tell me whats the criteria for search within A site search box?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Dipali</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a

 Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2013-05-18 02:47:20 by W3 Total Cache -->