<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round-up of this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Profit</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-7396</link>
		<dc:creator>Profit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-7396</guid>
		<description>More quality, original content in niche areas is the key to  progressive success. It&#039;s a bit pitiful though, having tested my traffic and found that more referrals come from newer search engines that don&#039;t compromise their results.

I&#039;d love to see google though coming back to the beloved search engine we all religiously used back in the old romantic days...ahhh. Nowadays I invest my fund to offline media; it works, thank Lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More quality, original content in niche areas is the key to  progressive success. It&#8217;s a bit pitiful though, having tested my traffic and found that more referrals come from newer search engines that don&#8217;t compromise their results.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see google though coming back to the beloved search engine we all religiously used back in the old romantic days&#8230;ahhh. Nowadays I invest my fund to offline media; it works, thank Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Bhawnani</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-7103</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Bhawnani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-7103</guid>
		<description>I just tried the &quot;Blogger Web Comments&quot; firefox extension, its totally AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the post !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried the &#8220;Blogger Web Comments&#8221; firefox extension, its totally AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Thanks for the post !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-7023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-7023</guid>
		<description>that would lose alot of money for google. I personally run about 8 sites all on the same adsense ID.  While it&#039;s not even enough to pay my car payment each month, I do like being able to get that monthly check instead of having to wait until each website hits over $100.

If google consolidated it to 1 account per site, everybody would switch over to yahoo.

I&#039;ve been beta testing YPN on one of my sites now, and it&#039;s already paying more per click.  Not sure if that will stay true as more sites get accepted into the program or they open it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that would lose alot of money for google. I personally run about 8 sites all on the same adsense ID.  While it&#8217;s not even enough to pay my car payment each month, I do like being able to get that monthly check instead of having to wait until each website hits over $100.</p>
<p>If google consolidated it to 1 account per site, everybody would switch over to yahoo.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been beta testing YPN on one of my sites now, and it&#8217;s already paying more per click.  Not sure if that will stay true as more sites get accepted into the program or they open it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TearingHairOut</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6786</link>
		<dc:creator>TearingHairOut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6786</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Google&#039;s next development would be to eliminate the vast majoraty of web spam by changing AdSense so that the code is only valid for one domain - the one which was first used by the applicant to apply for an AdSense account.

I guess that would be too much to expect for Christmas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Google&#8217;s next development would be to eliminate the vast majoraty of web spam by changing AdSense so that the code is only valid for one domain &#8211; the one which was first used by the applicant to apply for an AdSense account.</p>
<p>I guess that would be too much to expect for Christmas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Elliss</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Elliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6757</guid>
		<description>Those music links are great, but I wonder how long the lyrics links will last when the music industry is now clamping down on sites with lyrics on?

Henry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those music links are great, but I wonder how long the lyrics links will last when the music industry is now clamping down on sites with lyrics on?</p>
<p>Henry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6683</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6683</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;How about Google acquiring a 5% stake in AOL. That’s pretty big Google news.

Yep, and the word going around is that Google will be providing special assistance so AOL stuff can rank higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;How about Google acquiring a 5% stake in AOL. That’s pretty big Google news.</p>
<p>Yep, and the word going around is that Google will be providing special assistance so AOL stuff can rank higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rullto</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6675</link>
		<dc:creator>rullto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6675</guid>
		<description>Or what about google commissioning 700 new jobs in Dublin, Ireland - surely a significant move....! 
http://www.electricnews.net/news.html?code=9657888</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or what about google commissioning 700 new jobs in Dublin, Ireland &#8211; surely a significant move&#8230;.!<br />
<a href="http://www.electricnews.net/news.html?code=9657888" rel="nofollow">http://www.electricnews.net/news.html?code=9657888</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimmthething</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6651</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimmthething</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6651</guid>
		<description>I created a couple widgets:

Blackjack
http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/blackjack.html

Imageshack Hosting
http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/imageshack-hosting.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created a couple widgets:</p>
<p>Blackjack<br />
<a href="http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/blackjack.html" rel="nofollow">http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/blackjack.html</a></p>
<p>Imageshack Hosting<br />
<a href="http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/imageshack-hosting.html" rel="nofollow">http://andrewhitchcock.org/gwidgets/imageshack-hosting.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huvet</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6647</link>
		<dc:creator>Huvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6647</guid>
		<description>@Harith: Thanks for your reply. I should have read back a bit. I guess that I was hoping for an answer like &quot;Just make a good structure and the algos will add the links&quot; or, &quot;If your search is considered much more relevant than the second best you&#039;ll get them&quot;. But that&#039;s perhaps giving out to much info in the algos, so I guess the trial and error method will have to do this time too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Harith: Thanks for your reply. I should have read back a bit. I guess that I was hoping for an answer like &#8220;Just make a good structure and the algos will add the links&#8221; or, &#8220;If your search is considered much more relevant than the second best you&#8217;ll get them&#8221;. But that&#8217;s perhaps giving out to much info in the algos, so I guess the trial and error method will have to do this time too <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chung</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/round-up-of-this-week/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Chung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=131#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Google with their new release and acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Google with their new release and acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
