<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filing a reinclusion request</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO WebWorks</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-459144</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO WebWorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-459144</guid>
		<description>KRISTINA: &quot;In your posts, you mention that google needs to know 1) that the spam has been corrected or removed and 2) that it isn’t going to happen again.

However, what if I bought the domain from someone else and had no idea of what happened in the past?&quot;

When you file a request for reconsideration, you can include that in your comments which will let Google know that your site is under new ownership and that your current site meets Google&#039;s guidelines.  Best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KRISTINA: &#8220;In your posts, you mention that google needs to know 1) that the spam has been corrected or removed and 2) that it isn’t going to happen again.</p>
<p>However, what if I bought the domain from someone else and had no idea of what happened in the past?&#8221;</p>
<p>When you file a request for reconsideration, you can include that in your comments which will let Google know that your site is under new ownership and that your current site meets Google&#8217;s guidelines.  Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marekk</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-452301</link>
		<dc:creator>marekk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-452301</guid>
		<description>Fuck you and your reinclusion request !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck you and your reinclusion request !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-450560</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-450560</guid>
		<description>Its tricky i prefer to start with a new domain everytime as you never know what its been used for in the past. Ive used 301&#039;s in the past and they have worked well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its tricky i prefer to start with a new domain everytime as you never know what its been used for in the past. Ive used 301&#8217;s in the past and they have worked well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-442171</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-442171</guid>
		<description>In your posts, you mention that google needs to know 1) that the spam has been corrected or removed and 2) that it isn’t going to happen again.

However, what if I bought the domain from someone else and had no idea of what happened in the past?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your posts, you mention that google needs to know 1) that the spam has been corrected or removed and 2) that it isn’t going to happen again.</p>
<p>However, what if I bought the domain from someone else and had no idea of what happened in the past?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-441403</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-441403</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt

I agree with Simon. It would be great if Google could provide such a tool which helps identify if a site has been penalised. My web directory site was penalised over a year ago. Rankings went from page 1 to page 7 and Pagerank from 4 to 0.

I have since tried everything I could to remove anything which may have caused the penalty and have filed many reinclusion requests.

Recently, my site recovered some of it&#039;s PR but site rankings still remain low. I still continue to look through my site and always on the look out for advice which will help me remove any issues. Now a days advice comes at a cost. No one wants to provide such advice without being given some $$$ :(

It&#039;s really difficult knowing whether a site has been penalised so it would be helpful if Google could point webmasters in the right direction.

I hope Google will provide such tool in the near future.

By the way, i think you&#039;re doing a great job with providing Webmasters with useful info.

Thanks and all the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt</p>
<p>I agree with Simon. It would be great if Google could provide such a tool which helps identify if a site has been penalised. My web directory site was penalised over a year ago. Rankings went from page 1 to page 7 and Pagerank from 4 to 0.</p>
<p>I have since tried everything I could to remove anything which may have caused the penalty and have filed many reinclusion requests.</p>
<p>Recently, my site recovered some of it&#8217;s PR but site rankings still remain low. I still continue to look through my site and always on the look out for advice which will help me remove any issues. Now a days advice comes at a cost. No one wants to provide such advice without being given some $$$ <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really difficult knowing whether a site has been penalised so it would be helpful if Google could point webmasters in the right direction.</p>
<p>I hope Google will provide such tool in the near future.</p>
<p>By the way, i think you&#8217;re doing a great job with providing Webmasters with useful info.</p>
<p>Thanks and all the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-426970</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-426970</guid>
		<description>Can Google not create a tool that at least checks the system to determine whether your site/domain has receieved some sort of penatly? At first I thought it might have just been an algorithm change, however I&#039;m certain that wouldn&#039;t change my ranking from 3 to 400!

Guilty until proven innocent I guess. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Google not create a tool that at least checks the system to determine whether your site/domain has receieved some sort of penatly? At first I thought it might have just been an algorithm change, however I&#8217;m certain that wouldn&#8217;t change my ranking from 3 to 400!</p>
<p>Guilty until proven innocent I guess. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mani</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-386579</link>
		<dc:creator>Mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-386579</guid>
		<description>I know the reasons behind not alerting via webmaster tools that a site is under penalty, and they make perfect sense, however do you think there is value to be had in (slightly) more tailored responses to the reinclusion form? The reason I mention this is simply there&#039;s no way of telling for sure whether you had a penalty and whether what you did fixed it. This can leave webmasters living in fear of making the slightest change and being penalised for it. Even a simple response would help - something like: a) Yes, you were penalised and now you&#039;re not, b) You were penalised and you still are, or c) You&#039;re not penalised, don&#039;t worry.

Also, does anyone know how long after reinclusion the site will be back at its original ranking?

Mani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the reasons behind not alerting via webmaster tools that a site is under penalty, and they make perfect sense, however do you think there is value to be had in (slightly) more tailored responses to the reinclusion form? The reason I mention this is simply there&#8217;s no way of telling for sure whether you had a penalty and whether what you did fixed it. This can leave webmasters living in fear of making the slightest change and being penalised for it. Even a simple response would help &#8211; something like: a) Yes, you were penalised and now you&#8217;re not, b) You were penalised and you still are, or c) You&#8217;re not penalised, don&#8217;t worry.</p>
<p>Also, does anyone know how long after reinclusion the site will be back at its original ranking?</p>
<p>Mani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-377474</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-377474</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re in the midst of a reconsideration request. 

What&#039;s pro forma after receiving of an inclusion request... any acknowledgement by Google of the request? if so, within a xx weeks?

How would someone know for certain that the reinclusion request has been received? 

Any suggestions for protocol without being overbearing, but appropriately concerned?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re in the midst of a reconsideration request. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s pro forma after receiving of an inclusion request&#8230; any acknowledgement by Google of the request? if so, within a xx weeks?</p>
<p>How would someone know for certain that the reinclusion request has been received? </p>
<p>Any suggestions for protocol without being overbearing, but appropriately concerned?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jatropha, jatropha seed</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-373837</link>
		<dc:creator>jatropha, jatropha seed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-373837</guid>
		<description>I get a lot of comment spam on my sites. Is there a way to report these link spammers to Google so they can be considered for a spam penalty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of comment spam on my sites. Is there a way to report these link spammers to Google so they can be considered for a spam penalty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McClements</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/reinclusion-request-howto/#comment-165605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McClements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=40#comment-165605</guid>
		<description>&quot;301s from an old site to a new site shouldn’t cause any problem, so I wouldn’t use a reinclusion request for that.&quot;

301s from my old site to my new site have worked fine for google &#039;web&#039; results, but have caused huge problems with Google &#039;Image Search&#039; traffic which accounted for just over 50% of my total traffic.

(I reckon I&#039;ll lose over $1000 in Adsense income at this rate).

I know this is not the perfect place to post this question, but I have tried everywhere else, and Adsense support no longer respond to emails it seems...

Do I just have to wait 3 or 4 months for my images to be re-included in the image search results or is there *anything* I can do to speed this up?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;301s from an old site to a new site shouldn’t cause any problem, so I wouldn’t use a reinclusion request for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>301s from my old site to my new site have worked fine for google &#8216;web&#8217; results, but have caused huge problems with Google &#8216;Image Search&#8217; traffic which accounted for just over 50% of my total traffic.</p>
<p>(I reckon I&#8217;ll lose over $1000 in Adsense income at this rate).</p>
<p>I know this is not the perfect place to post this question, but I have tried everywhere else, and Adsense support no longer respond to emails it seems&#8230;</p>
<p>Do I just have to wait 3 or 4 months for my images to be re-included in the image search results or is there *anything* I can do to speed this up?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
