Comments on: Recent reinclusions http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/ neat fun stuff Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:33:38 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Nick Fritz http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-129517 Nick Fritz Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:46:19 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-129517 Personally I find Google to be a quiet helper for me and my clients, I've recently had one of my sites removed due to so called paid links which were actually not paid for at all. I requested a re inclusion and within a few days the page ranking was back to where it was and everything was normal. They just never gave me a response or a reason. Personally I find Google to be a quiet helper for me and my clients, I’ve recently had one of my sites removed due to so called paid links which were actually not paid for at all. I requested a re inclusion and within a few days the page ranking was back to where it was and everything was normal. They just never gave me a response or a reason.

]]> By: outsource seo professional http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-123715 outsource seo professional Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:56:12 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-123715 If big companies can be reincluded by google and given more attention, can google also do this to small comapnies or websites? If big companies can be reincluded by google and given more attention, can google also do this to small comapnies or websites?

]]> By: Anton Soehryo http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-112899 Anton Soehryo Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:43:41 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-112899 Wow, how do you exactly fight spam or even know its spam, if the person is speaking in our of this world language? Wow, how do you exactly fight spam or even know its spam, if the person is speaking in our of this world language?

]]> By: Sam http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-94896 Sam Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:56:13 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-94896 Matthew Howard, you should set off your redirect and what is it for anyway? Matthew Howard, you should set off your redirect and what is it for anyway?

]]> By: Matthew Howard http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-91836 Matthew Howard Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:26:26 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-91836 I am new to all this SEO stuff. I am a little bit lost on doorway pages too. Could you tell me if this is a doorway page as Google sees it at http://www.prettypetz.net It redirects to my main page, but has content that shows if the redirect doesn’t work. We just don’t want to be banned! Thanks I am new to all this SEO stuff. I am a little bit lost on doorway pages too. Could you tell me if this is a doorway page as Google sees it at http://www.prettypetz.net

It redirects to my main page, but has content that shows if the redirect doesn’t work. We just don’t want to be banned! Thanks

]]> By: bjorn http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-86417 bjorn Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:49:10 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-86417 All this makes me wonder, since I don't know how google can tell the difference between legit uses of javascript and "black-hat" uses: what if I have a page that relies heavily on javascript to present content through document.write() or other technique, but also has an alternative for non-javascript browsers? I think this is legit, and in my case it allows me to present a lot of info without overwhelming the user (many people complained about too much text), but I can see how an automated spider would either miss the javascript content, or penalize me, thinking I was trying to trick it, which I was not. This happens to be the situation for my home page, and I'm still listed, but I imagine it's an issue for many people: how can we ensure that javascript pages aren't accidentally banned or penalized? All this makes me wonder, since I don’t know how google can tell the difference between legit uses of javascript and “black-hat” uses: what if I have a page that relies heavily on javascript to present content through document.write() or other technique, but also has an alternative for non-javascript browsers? I think this is legit, and in my case it allows me to present a lot of info without overwhelming the user (many people complained about too much text), but I can see how an automated spider would either miss the javascript content, or penalize me, thinking I was trying to trick it, which I was not.

This happens to be the situation for my home page, and I’m still listed, but I imagine it’s an issue for many people: how can we ensure that javascript pages aren’t accidentally banned or penalized?

]]> By: you guys are all idiots or what? http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-82797 you guys are all idiots or what? Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:34:10 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-82797 Do I have to say it another way?? come on people!!! BMW go back in because google was afraid of being sued by them, big coorporation, big bucks, big lawyers. BMW would argue that they lost business in the Millions due to this banning and would take google to court. Google does not want that, they do not want to lose a few millions so, they send us a clear message, if you do something bad, spam, your site will be remove from google index, unless you are a powerful company that may sued us, then we will not keep you out of the index for too long. Sorry for the idiots comment, it was for a few people only ;) Do I have to say it another way?? come on people!!! BMW go back in because google was afraid of being sued by them, big coorporation, big bucks, big lawyers. BMW would argue that they lost business in the Millions due to this banning and would take google to court. Google does not want that, they do not want to lose a few millions so, they send us a clear message, if you do something bad, spam, your site will be remove from google index, unless you are a powerful company that may sued us, then we will not keep you out of the index for too long.

Sorry for the idiots comment, it was for a few people only ;)

]]> By: Sara Sentor http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-56193 Sara Sentor Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:59:20 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-56193 I would have to agree with the comments that google should warn webmasters before banning esp. since the legit webmasters are clueless about the reason for ban. My site was banned and I still do not know why.I do not link exchange, no marketing is done, all I have is articles [read original and written by myself articles] added on a weekly basis. The site was doing fine until bam the url disappeared from google and I have no idea why! Reinclusion would be great but it never seems to work! I would have to agree with the comments that google should warn webmasters before banning esp. since the legit webmasters are clueless about the reason for ban.

My site was banned and I still do not know why.I do not link exchange, no marketing is done, all I have is articles [read original and written by myself articles] added on a weekly basis.

The site was doing fine until bam the url disappeared from google and I have no idea why!

Reinclusion would be great but it never seems to work!

]]> By: Autobody Repairs http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-32346 Autobody Repairs Sun, 04 Jun 2006 19:20:30 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-32346 I hope Google dig out more like this! I hate searching for my site and finding so much rubbish in between! Frank Byrnes I hope Google dig out more like this!

I hate searching for my site and finding so much rubbish in between!

Frank Byrnes

]]> By: John http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/recent-reinclusions/#comment-28800 John Sat, 20 May 2006 17:45:18 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=202#comment-28800 Thats cool. But how long did it take before it got delisted? Thats cool. But how long did it take before it got delisted?

]]>