<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Quick comment on nofollow</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: estetik cerrahi</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-802010</link> <dc:creator>estetik cerrahi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:55:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-802010</guid> <description>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-631327</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-631327</guid> <description>I have a better understanding of no follow links now i have read this but still not 100% sure about them.If website A has a no follow link to website B, would website B still benefit from this? The only reason i ask is because a few competitors have a lot of spammy no follow links placed on high page rank sites that are irrelevant but for some reason it appears to benefit them?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a better understanding of no follow links now i have read this but still not 100% sure about them.</p><p>If website A has a no follow link to website B, would website B still benefit from this? The only reason i ask is because a few competitors have a lot of spammy no follow links placed on high page rank sites that are irrelevant but for some reason it appears to benefit them?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: santhosh</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-581910</link> <dc:creator>santhosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 06:44:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-581910</guid> <description>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?A hyperlink is a hyperlink. Some are nofollow, some are not (a.k.a. “dofollow”). All are valid links (i.e. “deliver someone to the destination URL”).Yahoo site explorer is not the engine that power’s Google, either, so asking the head of the Google Webspam Team about the ins and outs of a competitor’s public backlink-checking tool seems a bit weird. Sort of like asking the head coach of a winning football team why the losing teams drink so much Gatorade.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</p><p> A hyperlink is a hyperlink. Some are nofollow, some are not (a.k.a. “dofollow”). All are valid links (i.e. “deliver someone to the destination URL”).</p><p> Yahoo site explorer is not the engine that power’s Google, either, so asking the head of the Google Webspam Team about the ins and outs of a competitor’s public backlink-checking tool seems a bit weird. Sort of like asking the head coach of a winning football team why the losing teams drink so much Gatorade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn Friesen</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-577192</link> <dc:creator>Glenn Friesen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-577192</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?&lt;/blockquote&gt;A hyperlink is a hyperlink. Some are nofollow, some are not (a.k.a. &quot;dofollow&quot;). All are valid links (i.e. &quot;deliver someone to the destination URL&quot;).Yahoo site explorer is not the engine that power&#039;s Google, either, so asking the head of the Google Webspam Team about the ins and outs of a competitor&#039;s public backlink-checking tool seems a bit weird. Sort of like asking the head coach of a winning football team why the losing teams drink so much Gatorade.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</p></blockquote><p>A hyperlink is a hyperlink. Some are nofollow, some are not (a.k.a. &#8220;dofollow&#8221;). All are valid links (i.e. &#8220;deliver someone to the destination URL&#8221;).</p><p>Yahoo site explorer is not the engine that power&#8217;s Google, either, so asking the head of the Google Webspam Team about the ins and outs of a competitor&#8217;s public backlink-checking tool seems a bit weird. Sort of like asking the head coach of a winning football team why the losing teams drink so much Gatorade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Orjin Krem</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-562392</link> <dc:creator>Orjin Krem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:55:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-562392</guid> <description>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that “no follow” tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cafe</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-463960</link> <dc:creator>Cafe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:20:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-463960</guid> <description>I can see clearly that advertising your camcorder sales site on a dating site is (or gag dating site) is inappropriate. But on the other hand these indiscriminate spammers have created such a sensitivity that it is difficult to discuss a site that you really believe in, in related and appropriate forums.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see clearly that advertising your camcorder sales site on a dating site is (or gag dating site) is inappropriate. But on the other hand these indiscriminate spammers have created such a sensitivity that it is difficult to discuss a site that you really believe in, in related and appropriate forums.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kurye</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-454699</link> <dc:creator>kurye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:46:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-454699</guid> <description>Haha these are some really neat pictures.I’m not sure why anyone would want to live in a shack if they could stay here for free.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha these are some really neat pictures.</p><p>I’m not sure why anyone would want to live in a shack if they could stay here for free.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Smith</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-450706</link> <dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-450706</guid> <description>Im never sure when to use a no follow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im never sure when to use a no follow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-449877</link> <dc:creator>Will</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:13:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-449877</guid> <description>Why is it that &quot;no follow&quot; tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that &#8220;no follow&#8221; tagged links appear in Yahoo site explorer as valid inlinks, if they are not supposed to be?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/quick-comment-on-nofollow/#comment-427272</link> <dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=311#comment-427272</guid> <description>Hey I read this post about captchas and I put one on my site: www.cjeschke.com. It is just a box that you click that says I&#039;m not a spam bot. Will that work? Please email me with your answer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I read this post about captchas and I put one on my site: <a href="http://www.cjeschke.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cjeschke.com</a>. It is just a box that you click that says I&#8217;m not a spam bot. Will that work? Please email me with your answer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 23:48:59 -->
