<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank sculpting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-474300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-474300</guid>
		<description>Re the &quot;Print this page,&quot;...it is indeed useless. I have gotten rid of that phrase in my two websites. Also...re comments on blog, about 99% of my comments are garbled useless phrases from foreign countries. I have no idea why. Of course, I just delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the &#8220;Print this page,&#8221;&#8230;it is indeed useless. I have gotten rid of that phrase in my two websites. Also&#8230;re comments on blog, about 99% of my comments are garbled useless phrases from foreign countries. I have no idea why. Of course, I just delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay - DatMoney.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-473619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay - DatMoney.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-473619</guid>
		<description>No matter what, I&#039;m never going to understand PR.  For some reason I was a PR4 for quite a while, dropped to PR3 then PR2 and eventually PR0 for quite a while... still don&#039;t know why.

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what, I&#8217;m never going to understand PR.  For some reason I was a PR4 for quite a while, dropped to PR3 then PR2 and eventually PR0 for quite a while&#8230; still don&#8217;t know why.</p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-471614</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-471614</guid>
		<description>Quite interesting. If we doing the page rank sculpting with or without no follow links, will it affects our page rank or not ? I agree with Alex , yes the google can give an elaborated information for understanding the page rank deeply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite interesting. If we doing the page rank sculpting with or without no follow links, will it affects our page rank or not ? I agree with Alex , yes the google can give an elaborated information for understanding the page rank deeply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-467124</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-467124</guid>
		<description>Greetings Matt,

Great info about PageRank and linking. I have only one contention. You recommend that we allow PageRank to flow freely (even in blog comments), and yet this appears in all your outbound links in your blog comments...

 rel=&quot;external nofollow&quot;

I don&#039;t get it...did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings Matt,</p>
<p>Great info about PageRank and linking. I have only one contention. You recommend that we allow PageRank to flow freely (even in blog comments), and yet this appears in all your outbound links in your blog comments&#8230;</p>
<p> rel=&#8221;external nofollow&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it&#8230;did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Dolan</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-466982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-466982</guid>
		<description>Am I safe in assuming that any site that has PR can be considered a good neighbor?  

e.g. when checking blog comments if the sites that are posted all have PR, can I assume Google will view them as good neighbors and the links won&#039;t harm my site?

Thanks,

Jamie Dolan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I safe in assuming that any site that has PR can be considered a good neighbor?  </p>
<p>e.g. when checking blog comments if the sites that are posted all have PR, can I assume Google will view them as good neighbors and the links won&#8217;t harm my site?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jamie Dolan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-465462</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-465462</guid>
		<description>So if I understand it correctly, the PR points are divided by the total number of links, not by the number of links without &quot;no follow&quot; as it used to be earlier.

Then the only solution is linking less and not using &quot;no follow&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I understand it correctly, the PR points are divided by the total number of links, not by the number of links without &#8220;no follow&#8221; as it used to be earlier.</p>
<p>Then the only solution is linking less and not using &#8220;no follow&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cruise</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-460532</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cruise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-460532</guid>
		<description>What about links to an affiliate site? Are they considered &quot;bad neighborhood&quot; sites, even if they do give value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about links to an affiliate site? Are they considered &#8220;bad neighborhood&#8221; sites, even if they do give value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-460529</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-460529</guid>
		<description>Uf da. 

The net effect of just having read all 398 comments on this thread is that I would rather give up on SEO and buy PPC ads for my clients instead. Isn&#039;t that the goal after all? : )

I really hope that folks don&#039;t take the idea of disabling comments to heart... first that isn&#039;t much fun for you the blog owner or your visitors. Second... I just did a cursory glance at the SERPS for &#039;pagerank sculpting&#039;  (how I found this post). Interestingly enough, the number of comments almost has a direct correlation with the ranking of the URL. I&#039;m not so certain that there is a causal relationship there. But I would certainly consider that Google &lt;em&gt;probably has figured out how to count comments&lt;/em&gt; on a WP blog and probably factors that into ranking. I know that I would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uf da. </p>
<p>The net effect of just having read all 398 comments on this thread is that I would rather give up on SEO and buy PPC ads for my clients instead. Isn&#8217;t that the goal after all? : )</p>
<p>I really hope that folks don&#8217;t take the idea of disabling comments to heart&#8230; first that isn&#8217;t much fun for you the blog owner or your visitors. Second&#8230; I just did a cursory glance at the SERPS for &#8216;pagerank sculpting&#8217;  (how I found this post). Interestingly enough, the number of comments almost has a direct correlation with the ranking of the URL. I&#8217;m not so certain that there is a causal relationship there. But I would certainly consider that Google <em>probably has figured out how to count comments</em> on a WP blog and probably factors that into ranking. I know that I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-459886</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-459886</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t google publish a document explaining everything about the (one of the most discussed) page rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t google publish a document explaining everything about the (one of the most discussed) page rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashutosh Rai</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/#comment-456519</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashutosh Rai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2631#comment-456519</guid>
		<description>I am a great fan of Google&#039;s way of doing things(search engine and others). But often find it testing webmasters behavior against a little change Google suggest. After sometime things go back to their old place... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a great fan of Google&#8217;s way of doing things(search engine and others). But often find it testing webmasters behavior against a little change Google suggest. After sometime things go back to their old place&#8230; <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
