<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Page view metrics? Bah, humbug!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Sneezy Melon</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-118655</link> <dc:creator>Sneezy Melon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-118655</guid> <description>^ I dont think AJAX causes any problem to the GoogleBot. I&#039;ve seen lots of AJAX pages which are indexed perfectly</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^<br /> I dont think AJAX causes any problem to the GoogleBot. I&#8217;ve seen lots of AJAX pages which are indexed perfectly</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Apoorv Khatreja</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-118223</link> <dc:creator>Apoorv Khatreja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:32:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-118223</guid> <description>I was wondering what heavy AJAX pages would do the GoogleBot. Google does index maps from Google Maps, doesn&#039;t it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering what heavy AJAX pages would do the GoogleBot. Google does index maps from Google Maps, doesn&#8217;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEO Expert Dubai</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-113348</link> <dc:creator>SEO Expert Dubai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-113348</guid> <description>Hi Matt nice post you have got in here,Johny, i totally agree with you ajax is for specific type of websites and web developers who are using ajax technology normally don&#039;t care about the page views and so, all what they care about is to give the web visitors a better experience&#039;s using the website and come again and again and it&#039;s not limited.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt nice post you have got in here,</p><p>Johny, i totally agree with you ajax is for specific type of websites and web developers who are using ajax technology normally don&#8217;t care about the page views and so, all what they care about is to give the web visitors a better experience&#8217;s using the website and come again and again and it&#8217;s not limited.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Johny</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-104593</link> <dc:creator>Johny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-104593</guid> <description>Alex, i checked ur analytics platform, i doubt people will put the javascript everytime..  ajax isnt the solution for cms, its good for emails, chat, maps but i find it&#039;s usage very limited</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, i checked ur analytics platform, i doubt people will put the javascript everytime..  ajax isnt the solution for cms, its good for emails, chat, maps but i find it&#8217;s usage very limited</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-101227</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 10:03:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-101227</guid> <description>I’m working on a new analytics platform explicitly designed for Ajax applications - http://www.ajaxmetrics.com - and I’d love to hear what you have to say about it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m working on a new analytics platform explicitly designed for Ajax applications &#8211; <a href="http://www.ajaxmetrics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ajaxmetrics.com</a> &#8211; and I’d love to hear what you have to say about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ed</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-100552</link> <dc:creator>ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:18:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-100552</guid> <description>Great Info Matt! In Uk I see more Yahoo adverts on tv than google. Maybe google could market there engine over europe more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Info Matt! In Uk I see more Yahoo adverts on tv than google. Maybe google could market there engine over europe more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Heather Paquinas</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-99765</link> <dc:creator>Heather Paquinas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:20:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-99765</guid> <description>Here is the solution:http://www.ragepank.com/articles/45/ajax-is-here/to quote: &lt;blockquote&gt; This fix is actually quite straightforward. If you are interested in getting your site indexed properly by search engines, then it has to be crawlable with javascript off. So all hyperlinks on this site are static-looking, and crawler friendly. Next, I run a piece of javascript after the page has loaded which runs through the page and converts all the links to the javascript based links. If you don&#039;t have javascript, then the links won&#039;t get converted, which is exactly what we want. Because the javascript links return the same content as the regular links, this can&#039;t be considered black-hat SEO. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the solution:</p><p><a href="http://www.ragepank.com/articles/45/ajax-is-here/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ragepank.com/articles/45/ajax-is-here/</a></p><p>to quote:</p><blockquote><p> This fix is actually quite straightforward. If you are interested in getting your site indexed properly by search engines, then it has to be crawlable with javascript off. So all hyperlinks on this site are static-looking, and crawler friendly.<br /> Next, I run a piece of javascript after the page has loaded which runs through the page and converts all the links to the javascript based links.<br /> If you don&#8217;t have javascript, then the links won&#8217;t get converted, which is exactly what we want. Because the javascript links return the same content as the regular links, this can&#8217;t be considered black-hat SEO.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rose Water</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-94067</link> <dc:creator>Rose Water</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-94067</guid> <description>SEO is good for users; what&#039;s good for users will keep them at your site, which could create more linking opportunities like google maps has a &quot;link to this map&quot; on every map</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is good for users; what&#8217;s good for users will keep them at your site, which could create more linking opportunities like google maps has a &#8220;link to this map&#8221; on every map</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-92664</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-92664</guid> <description>I am very curios about this &quot;problem&quot; with metrics.  The largest problem I see in this area is that Ajax developers are not willing to bend to standards.  Dont take offense just yet...  Imagine if you will that you have an AJax application in dir /home/web/index.wtver now the Ajax requests presumably have to go somewhere on your server since Ajax is a domain restricted protocol.  Therefor, creating a driectory called /home/web/ajax_docs/ should allow the &quot;spiders&quot; of the search engines to see your pages from your sitemap.xml file and thus get you good results, as well as accurately measuring your metrics to individual &#039;locations&#039; in your site.  I know I know...   everyone is screaming right now &quot;yea, but what about when a user clicks that link from the search result?&quot;  ok fine, I&#039;ll admit, that can be as awkward as walking into a mall wearing only a towel.  So at the top of all of you Ajax content, you put a javascript redirect to your &quot;Home Page&quot; plus args to redirect the user to the correct place, via Ajax in your site.  The spiders cant read JS, and your users will never know the difference.  There are standards, and we need to recognize them and not get so lofty as to assume we are above them.  I think this idea would work.  Comments welcome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very curios about this &#8220;problem&#8221; with metrics.  The largest problem I see in this area is that Ajax developers are not willing to bend to standards.  Dont take offense just yet&#8230;  Imagine if you will that you have an AJax application in dir /home/web/index.wtver now the Ajax requests presumably have to go somewhere on your server since Ajax is a domain restricted protocol.  Therefor, creating a driectory called /home/web/ajax_docs/ should allow the &#8220;spiders&#8221; of the search engines to see your pages from your sitemap.xml file and thus get you good results, as well as accurately measuring your metrics to individual &#8216;locations&#8217; in your site.  I know I know&#8230;   everyone is screaming right now &#8220;yea, but what about when a user clicks that link from the search result?&#8221;  ok fine, I&#8217;ll admit, that can be as awkward as walking into a mall wearing only a towel.  So at the top of all of you Ajax content, you put a javascript redirect to your &#8220;Home Page&#8221; plus args to redirect the user to the correct place, via Ajax in your site.  The spiders cant read JS, and your users will never know the difference.  There are standards, and we need to recognize them and not get so lofty as to assume we are above them.  I think this idea would work.  Comments welcome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jake Matthews</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-92635</link> <dc:creator>Jake Matthews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/page-view-metrics-bah-humbug/#comment-92635</guid> <description>Matt,Great to see you coming to Yahoo&#039;s defense - eve if for a moment. ;-)At the end of the day, I believe that the AJAX change on Yahoo Mail goes to providing a better product - much better.  As such, who then really cares about page views?  This is a bit subjective, but not totally - it&#039;s just better and  people are using it because it&#039;s a better product.And specifically with mail - Yahoo will know how they&#039;re doing b/c the have the data on mail usage - and new sign-ups.Thanks for another great post.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p><p>Great to see you coming to Yahoo&#8217;s defense &#8211; eve if for a moment. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>At the end of the day, I believe that the AJAX change on Yahoo Mail goes to providing a better product &#8211; much better.  As such, who then really cares about page views?  This is a bit subjective, but not totally &#8211; it&#8217;s just better and  people are using it because it&#8217;s a better product.</p><p>And specifically with mail &#8211; Yahoo will know how they&#8217;re doing b/c the have the data on mail usage &#8211; and new sign-ups.</p><p>Thanks for another great post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-09 02:41:36 -->
