New Toolbar PageRanks visible

October 1, 2006

in Google/SEO

Roughly every 3-4 months we take a snapshot of PageRank values and export them so that the new values are visible in the Google Toolbar. I believe that another set of PageRanks started going out on Friday. New PageRanks are visible at many data centers, but not at every data center. Why not at every data center? Because some data centers are using a slightly older infrastructure for a few query types that are off the beaten path a bit (info:, link:, toolbar PageRank queries, etc.).

{ 109 comments… read them below or add one }

Dave (Original) October 1, 2006 at 10:51 pm

But are the toolbar PR values the exact same values as the one Google’s algo uses on a daily basis?

Harith October 1, 2006 at 11:33 pm

Good morning Matt

Thanks for update.

Keep asking you about new infrastructure weather report. Has it been a data refresh / data push during the weekend?

Thanks.

JohnMu October 1, 2006 at 11:47 pm

Do you re-calculate the PR completely before exporting? Is it the “working-copy” of the PR used internally on the date of the export? Any comments on truncated pagerank?

Mariush Minkov October 1, 2006 at 11:52 pm

Hello, Matt,

Could you tell us when was the snapshot taken? Some people believe the pagerank values exported are quite old. I would say they are from mid to 20th Sep. Do you have some details on this?

Thanks :)

dan October 2, 2006 at 12:23 am

I would guess the exported values are still a month or more old, based on the observation of a couple sites I market.

Simsi October 2, 2006 at 12:47 am

Hi Matt

Out of interest (and apologies if you covered this before but I couldn’t find it if you did), what do you personally consider TPR to be useful for these days from the average webmaster’s perspective?

Cheers

Simsi

Philipp Lenssen October 2, 2006 at 12:52 am

Matt, I often wonder, how is the PageRank value stored internally, is it a floating-point number as many people suggest or is it just the integer value itself due to the heavy recursive PR computations?

Saku October 2, 2006 at 1:03 am

I’m wondering why the exported PR is at least a month old? When checking the “new” results i came across some “old” links to one of my sites which i removed more than a month ago.

Sebastian October 2, 2006 at 1:28 am

Dear Matt

Is there any “official” way to ask you stuff or recommand one topic i’d like you to write a post about? I always feel bad, when i hijack your blog comments for questions.

Regards
Sebastian

Davdi Yin October 2, 2006 at 1:34 am

I noticed this update last week. You post answered why the update between data centers are not finished yet. Because of of the infrastructure. I think the new PageRank will not display until all data centers use the same infrastructure.

Harry Maugans October 2, 2006 at 1:36 am

Dear Matt,

About time. :)

Best Regards,
-Harry

Luca October 2, 2006 at 1:44 am

Hi Matt,

why do ‘u export the snapshot of PageRank values?

Best Regads

Atanas Yanev October 2, 2006 at 1:59 am

Hey Matt Cutts, did you pushed the red button for this PR update? :D
( http://www.ayanev.com/matt-cutts-button-working-334/ ;) )

What would you say about the discussion in digitalpoint about the dates of this PR update ?
Do you think its almost 2 months old data ?

Zensmith October 2, 2006 at 3:14 am

Matt,
Thanks for the update. Getting confirmation and updates such as this make being a webmaster much easier. I can now take less time fretting about PR updates and focus on building content for my site that will provide value to our users.

Old Welsh Guy October 2, 2006 at 3:30 am

This data is at LEAST 3 weeks old, according to my brief glance at it.

Nas Raja October 2, 2006 at 3:33 am

> This data is at LEAST 3 weeks old, according to my brief glance at it.

I have a couple of websites that got new links in the last three weeks and none before that – and these are showing increased PR values so I must deduce the data is not that old.

-Nas

Dave (Original) October 2, 2006 at 3:40 am

How do you know it’s not lagged and the PR you SEE now is not months old? One cannot simply count the new links as a link is not always a link come voting time.

Andy October 2, 2006 at 3:50 am

Thanks for the Toolbar Page Rank Update posting. The toolbar algorithm is really appreciable.

Atanas Yanev October 2, 2006 at 4:03 am

Well, I have 3 new websites – one with just one pr7 link, which was visible for 21-23 July, then removed… the website got pr5!

On 28-29 July I started to promote 2 brand new websites – linkbuilding etc (nice pr links for them) – they both are with 0 pr so far ;)

So I think this PR is a screenshot of 21-23 July variables ;)

Manuel SEO October 2, 2006 at 4:13 am

Hi Matt,

I’m also having some problems in having the PageRank value displayed in the new IE 7 Beta version.

I hope a new release is coming to solve this problem.

Manuel

Search Engines WEB October 2, 2006 at 4:17 am


http://livepr.raketforskning.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mattcutts.com%2Fblog%2Freminder-check-your-sites%2F

Here is a really superb way of gauging which datacenters are up to snuff – but what is really interesting is the time period that a Web page is required to have existed BEFORE getting ANY pagerank

The topic being analyzed was created:

July 5, 2006 @ 11:14 am · Filed under Google/SEO

Contest of Champions October 2, 2006 at 5:46 am

Over the past two weeks, my toolbar PR has been flipflopping between 4 and 5. I tell someone it is 5, and they tell me it is 4. I check it is 5, but they still insist it is 4. Google’s way of entertaining us :)

Ryan October 2, 2006 at 5:53 am

Nah, it’s at least over a month old.. as I have a website I launched last month that has about 1400 links (according to MSN)… but google still show’s 0… and a PR of 0. (although it’s alexa is still below 200,000)

Looks like the link: update is done in a greater monthly cycle than the pagerank one… or at least vastly differing cycles.

viggen October 2, 2006 at 5:54 am

Do i need to know that? What does it tell me when i know it? Why would i care? Meaning, what purpose has the Pagerank for the mom and pop site out there?

thanks
viggen

StrongCity October 2, 2006 at 5:59 am

At DP, a lot of discussion is going on about the date of this “visible” PR. People are guess that it is about 2 months old PR. Can you coment on that?

Andrew Hunter October 2, 2006 at 6:03 am

Hi Matt,

Thanks for the info.

I am seeing exactly what you describe above with my site. About 50% of data centers are reporting a jump from PR6 to 7 and 50% are saying I am still a PR6.

Will the data centers using the slightly older infrastructure be updated in due course, or will my PR be split by data center for the next couple of months?

Andrew

Luca Gilardoni October 2, 2006 at 6:18 am

Who is getting 10/10? a few random checks say http://www.apple.com wins (10!) over ibm, sun, microsoft (all 9) and mit,cmu,stanford aben old cambridge universty (all 9 as well).
Kudos for apple but … who else is there?

Peter October 2, 2006 at 6:33 am

thx for the news but that won’t make me install the spyware toolbar…

Glenn October 2, 2006 at 6:43 am

Is the page rank export complete?

Aaron Pratt October 2, 2006 at 6:44 am

viggen – I have dealt with this question also and believe that the only value of PageRank is to get your content crawled faster. In competitive areas it matters.

NetMidWest October 2, 2006 at 7:00 am

Atanas has it right, the PR released is a snapshot from around July 21-23, and uses the same data as the August 24th strange, frozen PR/BL event. (http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=129939 – what was that, Matt?) The backlinks released Friday are later than that – September 7th, I think.

Johan De Silva October 2, 2006 at 7:08 am

What a good question…

Dave (Original) Said,
But are the toolbar PR values the exact same values as the one Google’s algo uses on a daily basis?

Matt Crouch October 2, 2006 at 7:25 am

Actually, I am just curious why you are bothering telling us about a new PR update…. is this the first time you ever did? Are you just playing with people to make us wonder why you are talking about something.. ?

Thanks for the info nonetheless..

ChrisF October 2, 2006 at 7:33 am

Hi Matt

I noticed the pr update, was this all it was? The serp relative to my site have change completely since this pr update happened. You say that the pr update is a snap-shot of an already exciting value within the google system, therefore the serps should not change just because the visual pr changes. Should I wait for a data push to see the true extent of the pr changes.

Deep October 2, 2006 at 7:55 am

As far as my understanding goes, the data is certainly not the fresh one.It is around 3-4 weeks old atleast.

g1smd October 2, 2006 at 8:07 am

Not that I follow PR, but wouldn’t it be better for that livePR analyser thingy to just check one IP address on each of Google’s 44 active Class-C blocks, rather than a random (but fixed) 69 IPs out of more then 700 that are actually active? Although a lesser number, wouldn’t it be more representative of what is going on? … At present, nothing at all is checked an any of the other active 22 Class-C blocks.

Matthew October 2, 2006 at 8:18 am

Very cool guys. So this is saying, for example, that http://www.full1511.com is going to go from a PR1 to a PR5 in the next update?

http://livepr.raketforskning.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.full1511.com

Cheers! Matthew

Ryan October 2, 2006 at 8:23 am

I can’t find a Link… but to everybody asking the “are the toolbar questions teh same” question…

No they’re not.. Somebody (i think it might have been matt, or googleguy) posted this at one time..

The real pagerank is ever inreasing..

If you picture pagerank as an ever inreasing exponential graph… then chunk up the graph with straight vertical lines.. that’s sorta how it works..

from the original pagerank papers, pagerank is more than a 0-10 in reality.. the graph analogy above is how they come up with that 0-10 based on it’s real number.

(it’s a much better explanation if i can draw while I explain)

Timothy October 2, 2006 at 8:39 am

I thought it went to 11, just like in Spinal Tap…

Elias Kai October 2, 2006 at 9:05 am

HI Matt,
Yes I was following the Pr since friday and some well known spammy sites in the gambling industry has been dropping from 8 to 0 .

is it due to the new pr or is it just during this week when all data centers will gain the right PR in their toolbars ?

I feel great gaining more PR over this week end.

theGypsy October 2, 2006 at 9:34 am

Watching TBPR is for Link sellers and recip goons…

goggle eyewear October 2, 2006 at 10:01 am

Everyone is always wondering about PR and how it is calculated.. as I have seen very weird results to some sites especially new websites having a lot less backlinks gain PR4-5-6, any explanation on this?

phantombookman October 2, 2006 at 10:06 am

Amusingly, you are PR0 on my toolbar at this moment !

Peter October 2, 2006 at 10:12 am

Matt

Thank you very much for your reply to my question asked in the comments for your last post (about problems I’m having with the UK index).

I’m sure you’re very busy and I really appreciated you taking the time to read and reply to my problem. Thanks again.

Peter

JLH October 2, 2006 at 10:35 am

Phantom, try the non-www version of Matt’s site, all the page rank has gone to that version.

Aaron Shear October 2, 2006 at 11:01 am

But if the flux capacitor hits 1.2 Gigawatt’s, will that be enough to boost PR? Ok, I am having a really bad case of the Monday’s.

Kenny October 2, 2006 at 11:10 am

What good is pagerank? I lost all my page rank went from 5 to a 0.

Doesn’t matter it wasn’t like it was paying the bills. In fact google jerks my stes around so violently I learned not to depend on it’s traffic at all.

Michiel October 2, 2006 at 11:35 am

Thanks for the update about the update… nice timing !

I did a lot of changes, mainly reorganizing my pages, so had lot’s of index removing and 301’s to do and that was hurting my SERP’s, now things seem to get back to normal … :) Or is that just a coïncidence and has nothing to do with each other?

Nice !

Michiel October 2, 2006 at 11:40 am

By the way … this is also a very nice tool …

http://www.seologs.com/pr-check/fullpage-pr.html

You can check the PR of all the links of 1 page, so if you check your sitemap, you’ll see all the PR’s of all the pages, you can also check the different DC’s.

ciao

MannyJ October 2, 2006 at 11:59 am

Thanks for the update Matt.

And thanks for all the nice pagerank checking tools I found here.

Just bookmarked all of them as I find them very useful.

I should have found this site before.

peace.

Peyton Manning October 2, 2006 at 12:32 pm

Evil Matt Cutts told me this weeks ago….

Supplemental Challenged October 2, 2006 at 12:40 pm

The PR is a June snapshot. The backlinks are about ten days old.

The fact that Google can only create a PR update that is a full quarter behind the times is awfully troubling.

kumar October 2, 2006 at 1:18 pm

Matt’s playing with us!!! Otherwise the green in my toolbar would have moved at least 0.0005 mm.
I like this new spam control on your blog though. Is this effective as image verification?
Thanks for the update on pr update anyway!

Wall Art Decor October 2, 2006 at 1:32 pm

This “New” PR must be easily a month old. The new links (about 3 weeks old) and already indexed by G still not showing…..

JohnC October 2, 2006 at 1:58 pm

@ Matt Crouch. you ask why he posted this. I am not sure, but I am very glad he did. His brief explanation of the TB Page Rank update process will prove invaluable when that “hard to convince” webmaster does not understand why his PR has not changed yet.

Thanks Matt.

Aaron Pratt October 2, 2006 at 1:59 pm

Anyone notice extremely slow indexing of new pages starting a few days before this PR update and continuing today?

Is Google have trouble multitasking? Something just does not feel right…

Nadir October 2, 2006 at 3:35 pm

The supplemental issue doesn’t seem to be totally fixed, I’m still seeing some really WEIRD results… Hope you guys will fix that soon :)

PhilC October 2, 2006 at 3:53 pm

Toolbar PR is not PageRank. The Toolbar numbers are labels, and that’s all. They could equally well have been labeled A to K. Actual PageRank is a number (0 to nnnnnn…), and not a label. Each Toolbar label represents the portion in the 0 to nnnnnn scale where the page’s actual PageRank lies. So, no, the Toolbar values are not the PageRanks that are used by the engine.

I have some thoughts about whether or not the new Toolbar values are old, and why some people see evidence that it can’t be old, and others see evidence that is must be old.

To the best of my knowledge, PageRank is being continually calculated on a rolling basis. If that is so, then all but the current part of the index that is being calculated is always out of date to a lesser or greater degree. The most out of date it can be depends on how long it takes to move round the whole index. The new PR values are a snapshot, and any snapshot must include current and out of date calculation results (PageRanks).

That’s my best guess, anyway. If it’s anywhere near the mark, today’s calculations will include links that were found and indexed yesterday (they may only have been put up yesterday). And the PageRanks for the part that will be calculated tomorrow only included the links that were indexed some time ago – as long ago as it takes for the entire index’s PageRanks to be calculated. So, if the snapshot is taken today, the ages of the links that were part of the calculations can vary a lot. Some Toolbar PR’s won’t reflect links that were indexed quite a long time ago, whereas some Toolbar PRs could reflect links that were only put up, crawled and indexed yesterday.

g1smd October 2, 2006 at 4:15 pm

Michael: Although you list 41 IP addresses in that [i]SEOlogs[/i] tool, you’re only checking stuff on 19 out of the 44 Class-C blocks that are currently active.

On some Class-C blocks you check just one IP, and on others you are checking 4 or 5 IP addresses. Why not check one IP from each of the 44 blocks instead? Wouldn’t that give a better picture? At present there are [i]25[/i] Class-C blocks that are not checked at all – that’s more than half.

g1smd October 2, 2006 at 4:16 pm

Michael: Although you list 41 IP addresses in that SEOlogs tool, you’re only checking stuff on 19 out of the 44 Class-C blocks that are currently active.

On some Class-C blocks you check just one IP, and on others you are checking 4 or 5 IP addresses. Why not check one IP from each of the 44 blocks instead? Wouldn’t that give a better picture? At present there are 25 Class-C blocks that are not checked at all – and that’s more than half.

Al October 2, 2006 at 5:39 pm

It looks like some of the Google tools [ PR , site: , backlink etc etc ] being applied are misleading webmasters into their supposed accuracy, in which many believe, insofar as there is differentiation between DC’s at any one time, plus time lapses and selective suppression of information in total.

It would be good if there was consistancy upon which siteowners / webmasters could rely upon. Otherwise, they have limited status as a “tool”.

New Jersey SEO October 2, 2006 at 7:50 pm

Hi Matt,
Will this PR update affect SERPs? Are we going to have also a SERP data refresh / update?
Have a great day!

Dave (Original) October 2, 2006 at 9:32 pm

Not surprsingly, I don’t think Matt will answer my question :)

RE: “So, no, the Toolbar values are not the PageRanks that are used by the engine”
========================================

I think you forgot the “IMO” at the start :) I also *assume* the same, but. would love for Matt to answer my question and I’m going to hold my breath until he does :)

Svinus October 3, 2006 at 12:19 am

why is everybody so fixed on the pagerank ?

Roger Balmer October 3, 2006 at 10:39 am

Cause PageRank looks “sexy” to SEO’s…. It’s a dream to see a PR10 on your own site… A so called “SEO Orgasm”.

Mike October 3, 2006 at 10:23 pm

Hi Matt,

I realise you can’t answer any questions which could give anything away so I’ll ask a harmless question. When will the datacentres using the old infrastructure be updated?

Reg

Complete Web Design and Development October 4, 2006 at 8:34 am

Ideally how much time does it take for PR to update on all datacenters and to be visible in toolbars and PR checker tools?

Adiwebs.com October 4, 2006 at 10:10 pm

Thanks Matt,

PR PR PR. It is the same story again this time as was at every PR update. Why bother?

Jack October 5, 2006 at 10:21 pm

hi matt, i think the following question is generally applicable to a *lot* of webmasters these days: if a site’s PR has been flipping up and down the past few days, can we expect it to stabilize at the higher value when this update/export is over? I think you may have answered it in technical terms before, but I don’t understand the answer… I need it in plain English for us cybermorons… I have noticed many sites that are experiencing this, and a lot of questions on forums from people confused about it.

Tiger October 6, 2006 at 4:43 pm

Hi Matt,

Some SEO experts say that the pagerank you show us is false, it is just a marketing strategy for webmasters…

Why google lets show us pagerank but hides some backlinks results when we use command link: ?

As google said : “don’t be evil”, so may you, please, tell us the truth about that ;)

Thanks,

Paul

Ron Wilson October 8, 2006 at 8:07 pm

Mine stayed the same.

FemmeFatale October 10, 2006 at 3:20 am

Oh my god, i can’t believe people keep talking to Matt even when he’s not replying, hehehe. Peace

Cellular Gadget October 10, 2006 at 5:12 pm

I have been an avid observer of the Google Dance and I have seen great fluctuation between the updates and recently (the last 3 months) I notice that the update has occurred multiple times within a fairly short time-frame. Is it safe to say that the update will be initiated more frequently to ensure accurate information?

Btw, I like the Spam Protection you have set-up, I have implemented the same feature into all my contact pages just about a month ago. Keeps our inbox clean.

Thank you

Lever October 11, 2006 at 5:04 am

Matt, my boss gets so excited he nearly wets his pants when he hears about a PR update and yet he has never had a proper link-building strategy; 300 links in 6 years… Could you tell him to calm down please?

SEO Company October 14, 2006 at 4:51 am

Ya Matt I have just noticed what you said there was really a lot fluctuatiuons on different datacenters in this update.

Akash

bobmutch October 19, 2006 at 8:54 pm

Matt, Looks like we have a rollback on the last PR update. Would you care to comment on this.

mikl October 19, 2006 at 11:10 pm

Found here a list of buttons that can be integrated in a web page and showing the page rank. Check here:

http://www.siliconkit.com/resource/index.php?Page_Rank_checkers&normal&print

Sam October 23, 2006 at 2:54 pm

mikl, I just wanted to add that you missed out a pagerank button. It’s the one I use on my site although i’m sure their are many more. Add this code:

Off course replace mattcutts with your own domain name.

Thinkbasic November 16, 2006 at 2:10 pm

@ Roger Balmer Said,
“”"Cause PageRank looks “sexy” to SEO’s…. It’s a dream to see a PR10 on your own site… A so called “SEO Orgasm”. “”"

You ever got a Orgasm of a high pagerank website? :P

Jon December 4, 2006 at 2:21 am

Hi Matt,

So are you able to confirm that the PageRank shown in Google toolbar is ony as good as the pagerank for that specific web page on the day of the snapshot?. I appreciate that it would probably be impossible to update toolbar pr everyday, but does Google re-calculate for each and every new day?

Thaiseo January 16, 2007 at 10:11 am

digpagerank.com Can check all pagerank datacenter.Cool tool i think

Paul January 22, 2007 at 3:45 pm

Why do different datacentres have contain different PR ?

Fanny February 11, 2007 at 11:56 am

Hello !

did the pagerank die? Can one always say that it is a quality control mark? will it be replaced by the trustRank? and will the fresh rank be or is already validated? Thank you.

Noneq April 12, 2007 at 11:11 am

I think we will again see a similar titled post of Matt Cutts in a few weeks. I am curious about the PRs.

Seo Expert April 24, 2007 at 4:11 pm

I think we will again see a similar titled post of Matt Cutts in a few weeks. I am curious about the PRs.

PageRank on my mind May 2, 2007 at 1:46 pm

Yes it is for some bitter and the others pay day? I noticed changes for pages which have been newly issued. From PR 0 up to 3 or 4. What is Ur expirience?

Shanmuharajan June 8, 2007 at 6:56 am

PR:
Shorthand for PageRank: the actual, real, page rank for each page as calculated by Google. As we’ll see later this can range from 0.15 to billions.

Toolbar PR:
The PageRank displayed in the Google toolbar in your browser. This ranges from 0 to 10.

Backlink:
If page A links out to page B, then page B is said to have a “backlink” from page A.

Urbanist September 23, 2007 at 2:29 am

Hah, this came up in a Google search for ‘October 2007 Pagerank Update’ … sigh … 3 to 4 months? How times have changed!

Raj October 1, 2007 at 3:59 am

Any ideas, When is the next page rank update. Supposed to be in July,
They said in August, Then September, Now is it October,

Any signs or clues about this update ?

Dịch Vụ Quảng Bá October 7, 2007 at 8:28 am

Google takes a snapshot of PageRank values every 3-4 months. I do not know why Google can not say every 3 or 4 months only?

Mark October 12, 2007 at 11:23 pm

I am watching the situation about updating. It seems to be it should be very soon. Maybe this weekend …

Grant Glendinning October 16, 2007 at 6:13 am

We can only hope the PageRank update will be any day soon. In your Google Webmaster account, under Crawl Stats – is that the live PageRank value, or is that only exported every few months when Google also exports the Toolbar PR’s?

freelancer October 22, 2007 at 6:46 am

Looks like pagerank from webmaster tools is updated only when toolbar data is exported.

Jeffrey L. Smith October 25, 2007 at 3:19 pm

Frankly Matt, I think at this point many webmasters would be glad to exchange their 2006 PR values from the latest Google Page Rank update on October of 2007. Funny how those people who didn’t care about page rank are the first ones to cry about it when the little green bar takes a dip. It’s not to say that the website is a mere shadow of it’s former self, it’s just a more realistic reference point minus the inflated links.

Ganesh J. Acharya October 26, 2007 at 12:42 am

I wish google show’s a live Page Rank Indicator, so we can immeadiately correct our errors.

Mark October 26, 2007 at 3:21 am

Seems to me that a lot of people are seeing a delcine rather than an increase. My site still has low page rank. But on some pages on my site when you check the google links it list the home page meaning that in thoroey it should have a rank over 4 right.

hema October 27, 2007 at 1:39 am

I am happy to see my page rank updated, but, most of the my friends who are bloggers and had a high page rank of 4 have been reduced to 3 and 2. Is it because they are not updating their blog, or they haven’t optimized their blog and built links.

Thanks!

Oren October 31, 2007 at 8:40 am

My site page rank went from 5 to 6 but my place in google result went up on all keywords.

Caglar kaya January 2, 2008 at 12:49 pm

Could you tell us when was the snapshot taken? Some people believe the pagerank values exported are quite old. I would say they are from mid to 20th Sep. Do you have some details on this?

Arik January 6, 2008 at 12:41 pm

Hi! I’m new to all this – so apologies for asking a potentially ‘dumb’ question – or one which has been covered earlier. How do I track when a page rank for a specific page changes? Is there software available? All help, kindly appreciated! thx.

Stuart Buckell January 14, 2008 at 1:22 am

I’m curious – does this mean that the PR we are viewing via the toolbar is over 3 months old? How do we see the latest PR.

Cheers,

Pula February 19, 2008 at 2:14 am

Yes, definitely you need to query different data centers to find the average PR. It would be great Mat if you could keep PR history and PR prediction updates by date so we all know when will approximately the next PR update start.

Mike June 1, 2008 at 7:51 pm

It seems to me that rankings is some what linked to page rank updates. Does any one angree?

Svi Poslovi June 7, 2008 at 1:31 pm

“… so we all know when will approximately the next PR update start…”

That would be very good. It’s a specially useful information for domain name bidders because bidders can’t know what’s happening with the domain name otherwise.

BRIJESH July 27, 2008 at 6:47 am

I read many places, earlier about the devaluation of PR, how much its true.

I know its not a small thing to deactivate the value of PR term.

Any thought on this.

Thank you
Brijesh Kumar

NeuroToxic August 16, 2008 at 10:49 pm

I was very disappointed by my websites http://wolfet.co.uk pagerank after the last google PR update, i thought that i had done plenty enough back linking work to see a big increase in PR, im guessing that i must do 10 times more than i did to see an increase, maybe im just a pessimist but it seems that the big names on the web just get bigger and bigger while us small fish float around trying to pick up the left over scraps, i recently watched some of your many video clips on http://www.youtube.com ,the one explaining what googlebot does with 404’s ect explained with colored M & M’s was very amusing to watch, btw i read here that the google toolbar PR’s are updated every 3-4 months, but when and how often are the google’s PR database’s updated?, is that being updated constantly day by day?

IT UK September 15, 2008 at 1:22 pm

NeuroToxic,

What was the title of the youtube clip?

PureSA January 3, 2009 at 12:09 am

I am very happy with Google, I have been waiting for my site http://www.puresa.co.za to be ranked and when it was it came in at PR 4/10, it has been up for 2 months and we have put a tremendous amount of effort into our SEO..Thanks, Google and thank you Matt..

Pinstripe dry cleaners May 2, 2009 at 7:16 am

I am still trying to find out when the next pagerank update will be? I am also interested in knowing how long it takes google to find the links i’ve posted on different website. Our dry cleaners delivery service would benefit from getting some more traffic, looking forward to seeing the results for our dry cleaners in the future.

Leave a Comment

If you have a question about your site specifically or a general question about search, your best bet is to post in our Webmaster Help Forum linked from http://google.com/webmasters

If you comment, please use your personal name, not your business name. Business names can sound salesy or spammy, and I would like to try people leaving their actual name instead.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: