<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth busting: delays in page loading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:58:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yang Yang</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-353887</link>
		<dc:creator>Yang Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-353887</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m a Google search engineer I sure would take into consideration of the average loading time (or average loading Kbps) of a website. Because it&#039;s a big part of the end user experience.

I would rank fast sites over slow sites for the sake of good user exeprience to the Google users. Though the ranking nuances might be slim but there it should be in my opinion.

So are you saying, site A that&#039;s constantly 5 times slower than site B will be no inferior to site B in Google search rankings at all?

With due respect, I don&#039;t know if you have close contact to the technical staff of Google (or you are one of them?), or maybe you are just busting the myth by taking the myth automatically incorrect, please if you can, can you confirm this with someone who&#039;s directly responsible for the ranking algorithms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m a Google search engineer I sure would take into consideration of the average loading time (or average loading Kbps) of a website. Because it&#8217;s a big part of the end user experience.</p>
<p>I would rank fast sites over slow sites for the sake of good user exeprience to the Google users. Though the ranking nuances might be slim but there it should be in my opinion.</p>
<p>So are you saying, site A that&#8217;s constantly 5 times slower than site B will be no inferior to site B in Google search rankings at all?</p>
<p>With due respect, I don&#8217;t know if you have close contact to the technical staff of Google (or you are one of them?), or maybe you are just busting the myth by taking the myth automatically incorrect, please if you can, can you confirm this with someone who&#8217;s directly responsible for the ranking algorithms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bouree</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-306278</link>
		<dc:creator>bouree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-306278</guid>
		<description>I have a question related to this topic:

Does the google bot parse just the HTML or actually load an image? Meaning, if my HTML page size is 50KB vs the actual page size with all the images and flash and what not is like 500KB, does the google bot load 500KB like a browser or just the 50KB? 

And how will this affect indexing? 

Appreciate a response. 
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question related to this topic:</p>
<p>Does the google bot parse just the HTML or actually load an image? Meaning, if my HTML page size is 50KB vs the actual page size with all the images and flash and what not is like 500KB, does the google bot load 500KB like a browser or just the 50KB? </p>
<p>And how will this affect indexing? </p>
<p>Appreciate a response.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mincemeat</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mincemeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90257</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the people which host their sites at home with DSL. If they not want to pay the 10 bucks for a standard webhosting package they should close the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the people which host their sites at home with DSL. If they not want to pay the 10 bucks for a standard webhosting package they should close the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90160</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90160</guid>
		<description>Who exactly is jameno123?  Why are links with my domain name and urls with my domain name showing &quot;&amp;username=jameno123&quot; tagged onto the end of them.   The Google sitemap errors shown with this tag at the end of urls are no longer a coincidence.  

Someone is doing this on purpose.  Got the time to investigate?  If my investigation has turned up the right person, I have no choice but to contact authortities, unless you can assure me in some fashion that he isn&#039;t harming my business......it seems as though he is.....late September, all msn traffic gone.....a few weeks later, all yahoo traffic gone.  If all google traffic disappears, his name makes headlines.  

I&#039;ve been in contact with a .edu domain administrator who is willing to help since fake p*rn links to other sites were found within a wiki ( wiki.cs.uiuc.edu ) on their .edu domain.  They&#039;ve altered the page ( wiki.cs.uiuc.edu/CISTUG/&amp;username%3Djameno123 ) since I notified them, after a google search, about this person.  I think he lives in Amelia, OH....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who exactly is jameno123?  Why are links with my domain name and urls with my domain name showing &#8220;&amp;username=jameno123&#8243; tagged onto the end of them.   The Google sitemap errors shown with this tag at the end of urls are no longer a coincidence.  </p>
<p>Someone is doing this on purpose.  Got the time to investigate?  If my investigation has turned up the right person, I have no choice but to contact authortities, unless you can assure me in some fashion that he isn&#8217;t harming my business&#8230;&#8230;it seems as though he is&#8230;..late September, all msn traffic gone&#8230;..a few weeks later, all yahoo traffic gone.  If all google traffic disappears, his name makes headlines.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in contact with a .edu domain administrator who is willing to help since fake p*rn links to other sites were found within a wiki ( wiki.cs.uiuc.edu ) on their .edu domain.  They&#8217;ve altered the page ( wiki.cs.uiuc.edu/CISTUG/&amp;username%3Djameno123 ) since I notified them, after a google search, about this person.  I think he lives in Amelia, OH&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viz</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90138</link>
		<dc:creator>Viz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90138</guid>
		<description>When my page loading time was more than 5 sec, 90% of visitors used to leave beofore seeing my page - now that it&#039;s about 3sec I can see about 50 % sticking around for longer
I can&#039;t stress anough on page loading speed: more important than any other seo practice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my page loading time was more than 5 sec, 90% of visitors used to leave beofore seeing my page &#8211; now that it&#8217;s about 3sec I can see about 50 % sticking around for longer<br />
I can&#8217;t stress anough on page loading speed: more important than any other seo practice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stéphane Bortzmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90010</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane Bortzmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-90010</guid>
		<description>I have no reliable information on search engine ranking but I just wanted to indicate useful tools to check your Web pages load delay: curl (http://curl.haxx.se/) and echoping (http://echoping.sourceforge.net/) Both are free software.

For instance, with curl, I can do:

% curl --output /dev/null --write-out &quot;Total time: %{time_total} s, DNS time %{time_namelookup} s, connect time %{time_connect} s, %{size_download} bytes transferred\n&quot; http://www.mattcutts.com/
  
% Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100   471  100   471    0     0   2382      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0
Total time: 0.198 s, DNS time 0.003 s, connect time 0.004 s, 471 bytes transferred

And see that the network is fine and the download time reasonable.

curl did not get images, so if images are an important part of the page, you may have to use another tricks (left as an exercice for the reader).

Also, if you consider user experience and not only network time, very often, the time to display depends, not on the lot time, but of the display time (Javascript to run, complicated CSS, layout, etc).

Disclaimer: I&#039;m the author of echoping so the moderator is free to regard this as unsollicited advertisment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no reliable information on search engine ranking but I just wanted to indicate useful tools to check your Web pages load delay: curl (<a href="http://curl.haxx.se/" rel="nofollow">http://curl.haxx.se/</a>) and echoping (<a href="http://echoping.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://echoping.sourceforge.net/</a>) Both are free software.</p>
<p>For instance, with curl, I can do:</p>
<p>% curl --output /dev/null --write-out &#8220;Total time: %{time_total} s, DNS time %{time_namelookup} s, connect time %{time_connect} s, %{size_download} bytes transferred\n&#8221; <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/</a></p>
<p>% Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current<br />
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed<br />
100   471  100   471    0     0   2382      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--     0<br />
Total time: 0.198 s, DNS time 0.003 s, connect time 0.004 s, 471 bytes transferred</p>
<p>And see that the network is fine and the download time reasonable.</p>
<p>curl did not get images, so if images are an important part of the page, you may have to use another tricks (left as an exercice for the reader).</p>
<p>Also, if you consider user experience and not only network time, very often, the time to display depends, not on the lot time, but of the display time (Javascript to run, complicated CSS, layout, etc).</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I&#8217;m the author of echoping so the moderator is free to regard this as unsollicited advertisment <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikas123</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89998</link>
		<dc:creator>vikas123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89998</guid>
		<description>does page size calculate page load time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does page size calculate page load time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Tateossian</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89951</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Tateossian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89951</guid>
		<description>Are there any recent postings elsewhere that clarifies on the matter of page load time and whether it affects how your pages get ranked or crawled by SEs? I wasn&#039;t able to find any postings by Matt on this matter solely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any recent postings elsewhere that clarifies on the matter of page load time and whether it affects how your pages get ranked or crawled by SEs? I wasn&#8217;t able to find any postings by Matt on this matter solely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MidasSoft</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89856</link>
		<dc:creator>MidasSoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89856</guid>
		<description>does that mean the page size doesn&#039;t affect the way SE crawls a site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does that mean the page size doesn&#8217;t affect the way SE crawls a site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurgen Kleykamp</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurgen Kleykamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-delays-in-page-loading/#comment-89852</guid>
		<description>Well spoken Chris! There are many ways to Rome...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spoken Chris! There are many ways to Rome&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
