<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: MSFT adds bot verification</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-106894</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:42:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-106894</guid> <description>I wrote a script (maybe you know about it ?) to ban bad bots. There are offen questions about, how googlebot handels the robots.txt. So i also implemented the RDNS Check for Google.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a script (maybe you know about it ?) to ban bad bots.<br /> There are offen questions about, how googlebot handels the robots.txt.<br /> So i also implemented the RDNS Check for Google.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan Ong</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-105335</link> <dc:creator>Bryan Ong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-105335</guid> <description>Hi MattI&#039;ve got a question. Both visitsnw.com.au and visitnsw.com got a Pagerank of 6 and same equal amount of links. Why is that so?All of Tourism NSW&#039;s ranking is on their .com.au domain. Can you please explain? How does Google knows that it is the .com.au that it has to give rankings and not the .com domain even though it has same equalt amount of links and pagerank?Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt</p><p>I&#8217;ve got a question. Both visitsnw.com.au and visitnsw.com got a Pagerank of 6 and same equal amount of links. Why is that so?</p><p>All of Tourism NSW&#8217;s ranking is on their .com.au domain. Can you please explain? How does Google knows that it is the .com.au that it has to give rankings and not the .com domain even though it has same equalt amount of links and pagerank?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-104436</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 12:48:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-104436</guid> <description>The solution discussed in this post is more complicated than necessary. I&#039;ve explained a better solution here:http://botsosphere.blogspot.com/2007/05/automatic-verification-of-machine.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution discussed in this post is more complicated than necessary. I&#8217;ve explained a better solution here:</p><p><a href="http://botsosphere.blogspot.com/2007/05/automatic-verification-of-machine.html" rel="nofollow">http://botsosphere.blogspot.com/2007/05/automatic-verification-of-machine.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Linsley</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90442</link> <dc:creator>Peter Linsley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90442</guid> <description>Hi Matt,The issue of whether Ask could support bot authentication was raised in Las Vegas at PubCon and we&#039;ve updated the webmaster FAQ. No surprises here, it&#039;s the old DNS roundtrip lookup trick; all our crawlers are under the ask.com domain:http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/webmasters.shtmlCheers.Peter</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p><p>The issue of whether Ask could support bot authentication was raised in Las Vegas at PubCon and we&#8217;ve updated the webmaster FAQ. No surprises here, it&#8217;s the old DNS roundtrip lookup trick; all our crawlers are under the ask.com domain:</p><p> <a href="http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/webmasters.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/webmasters.shtml</a></p><p>Cheers.</p><p>Peter</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Multi-Worded Adam</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90408</link> <dc:creator>Multi-Worded Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:26:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90408</guid> <description>So what you&#039;re saying is that my Gigablast prediction is an off-the-board pick, correct?  ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that my Gigablast prediction is an off-the-board pick, correct? <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IncrediBILL</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90374</link> <dc:creator>IncrediBILL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90374</guid> <description>Matt, I did a little checking and it looks like the ExaleadGuy might&#039;ve beaten you to the punch on this one.Now if they could just make their user agent string a little more useful or post a page with information about their crawler I can find...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I did a little checking and it looks like the ExaleadGuy might&#8217;ve beaten you to the punch on this one.</p><p>Now if they could just make their user agent string a little more useful or post a page with information about their crawler I can find&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mack</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90372</link> <dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90372</guid> <description>Your timing with this post is uncanny. This morning I checked my stats with recent visitors and noticed two totally different IP addresses that were identified as Googlebot. With a little reasearch I found that IP address 207.176.38.75, one of the two identified as Googlebot, is actually owned by  Beyond The Network America, Inc. in Herndon, VA. My question would be, is this something for me to be concerned with?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your timing with this post is uncanny. This morning I checked my stats with recent visitors and noticed two totally different IP addresses that were identified as Googlebot. With a little reasearch I found that IP address 207.176.38.75, one of the two identified as Googlebot, is actually owned by  Beyond The Network America, Inc. in Herndon, VA. My question would be, is this something for me to be concerned with?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ExaleadGuy</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90354</link> <dc:creator>ExaleadGuy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:57:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90354</guid> <description>That&#039;s funny because actually, Exalead has got this reverse DNS stuff from the beginning of its existence (that is to say 2000) Ah we should have patented it and ask Google and MSN for royalties now ;-)In fact we did it because we were so sure that the other bots already did it for a long time.If it is that fashion, we gonna add it to our FAQ too ;-)&gt; host 193.47.80.51 51.80.47.193.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer crawl15.exabot.com. &gt; host crawl15.exabot.com. crawl15.exabot.com has address 193.47.80.51</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny because actually, Exalead has got this reverse DNS stuff from the beginning of its existence (that is to say 2000)<br /> Ah we should have patented it and ask Google and MSN for royalties now <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>In fact we did it because we were so sure that the other bots already did it for a long time.</p><p>If it is that fashion, we gonna add it to our FAQ too <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>&gt; host 193.47.80.51<br /> 51.80.47.193.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer crawl15.exabot.com.<br /> &gt; host crawl15.exabot.com.<br /> crawl15.exabot.com has address 193.47.80.51</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Cutts</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90327</link> <dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:50:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90327</guid> <description>Jojo, points for the first post I saw to get it, with joergvader coming up in second place.M.W.A., if Gigablast does it next, I will do a post just to commemorate that. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jojo, points for the first post I saw to get it, with joergvader coming up in second place.</p><p>M.W.A., if Gigablast does it next, I will do a post just to commemorate that. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dema</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90325</link> <dc:creator>Dema</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:10:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/msft-adds-bot-verification/#comment-90325</guid> <description>Well they do have to increase the bot protection, but those bots aren&#039;t very good, most of the software right not can by pass them easily, but it takes a brain to put that software together, which is why its not so cheap.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they do have to increase the bot protection, but those bots aren&#8217;t very good, most of the software right not can by pass them easily, but it takes a brain to put that software together, which is why its not so cheap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 23:59:43 -->
