<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More weather reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-119281</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-119281</guid>
		<description>I recently noticed a page rank change on my hotel site. I am wondering how accurate some of these older blog postings are or if I am better off looking at newer posts. Thanks for all your insights matt, but I am curious if there is an updated list. Only the middle IP above seems to resolve. Please reply with any additional lists or resources. Many thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently noticed a page rank change on my hotel site. I am wondering how accurate some of these older blog postings are or if I am better off looking at newer posts. Thanks for all your insights matt, but I am curious if there is an updated list. Only the middle IP above seems to resolve. Please reply with any additional lists or resources. Many thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazer epilasyon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-92470</link>
		<dc:creator>lazer epilasyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-92470</guid>
		<description>thanks for info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-26815</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 03:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-26815</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me what might help my site gain pr? I&#039;ve been online for a year now, submitted to all the directories I could find that seemed to be good directories, and I have several relevant outgoing links on my site. I havent pursued a link exchange however because I wanted to make sure that I didn&#039;t take a chance on not getting Pr at all. On the last update my site was finally awarded a Pr 1. Any ideas on what could cause this and what I might do that would rectify the situation? Thank you very much!

Sincerely,

Angie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me what might help my site gain pr? I&#8217;ve been online for a year now, submitted to all the directories I could find that seemed to be good directories, and I have several relevant outgoing links on my site. I havent pursued a link exchange however because I wanted to make sure that I didn&#8217;t take a chance on not getting Pr at all. On the last update my site was finally awarded a Pr 1. Any ideas on what could cause this and what I might do that would rectify the situation? Thank you very much!</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Angie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Locker MD</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-18097</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Locker MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-18097</guid>
		<description>Amazing.

Michael Locker MD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing.</p>
<p>Michael Locker MD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L. Vaultonburg</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L. Vaultonburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>I actually want to ask a serious question because poke all the fun you want at it PR does matter. If this is my first PR and I went from 0 to 4 what do I have to do to go from 4 to maybe five or 6 on the next PR and is 6 the maximum PR a personal website can get?

Wi&#039;&#039; extending my domain names from one year to like five years help and also do I need to continuosly update my sites to keep Google interested?

Thomas www.dirtytrickssquad.com zombielogic@insightbb.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually want to ask a serious question because poke all the fun you want at it PR does matter. If this is my first PR and I went from 0 to 4 what do I have to do to go from 4 to maybe five or 6 on the next PR and is 6 the maximum PR a personal website can get?</p>
<p>Wi&#8221; extending my domain names from one year to like five years help and also do I need to continuosly update my sites to keep Google interested?</p>
<p>Thomas <a href="http://www.dirtytrickssquad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dirtytrickssquad.com</a> <a href="mailto:zombielogic@insightbb.com">zombielogic@insightbb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas L. Vaultonburg</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas L. Vaultonburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>I have no real life so the PR update(which is my first) is a big deal. My sites went from 0 to 4 which means nothing because I have no product or service to sell and even if I did I&#039;m sure no one would buy iy. But it does occupy my time signing all these guest books. www.zombielogicpress.com My one website that remained 0... www.dontshopatwalmart.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no real life so the PR update(which is my first) is a big deal. My sites went from 0 to 4 which means nothing because I have no product or service to sell and even if I did I&#8217;m sure no one would buy iy. But it does occupy my time signing all these guest books. <a href="http://www.zombielogicpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zombielogicpress.com</a> My one website that remained 0&#8230; <a href="http://www.dontshopatwalmart.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dontshopatwalmart.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQer</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>FAQer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>Only if the searchers in question are looking for completely irrelevant results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if the searchers in question are looking for completely irrelevant results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>RE: &quot;One would think that with all of those billions of dollars, Google could afford a test environment…&quot;

They can, it&#039;s called Webmasters &amp; SEO ......us :)

When/if a Webmaster/SEO complains that their targetted SERPs are no good, Google can be sure they have got it right for their searchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;One would think that with all of those billions of dollars, Google could afford a test environment…&#8221;</p>
<p>They can, it&#8217;s called Webmasters &amp; SEO &#8230;&#8230;us <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When/if a Webmaster/SEO complains that their targetted SERPs are no good, Google can be sure they have got it right for their searchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAQer</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>FAQer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>Eddie-:

One would think that with all of those billions of dollars, Google could afford a test environment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie-:</p>
<p>One would think that with all of those billions of dollars, Google could afford a test environment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/more-weather-reporting/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=66#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>LOL! Same old posts after every major Google update. All those that have lost placings say the SERPs are spammy, while those who gained, or stayed static, say the SERPs are fine.

I think the PR junkies should stop seeing Toolbar PR as being real PR. Do we really think Google would supply a free tool to the World that can be used to determine true PR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! Same old posts after every major Google update. All those that have lost placings say the SERPs are spammy, while those who gained, or stayed static, say the SERPs are fine.</p>
<p>I think the PR junkies should stop seeing Toolbar PR as being real PR. Do we really think Google would supply a free tool to the World that can be used to determine true PR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
