<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who came out ahead in the Microsoft-Yahoo deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Singapore</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-378408</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Singapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-378408</guid>
		<description>No doubt is MS came out ahead. As from a recent news, MS decided to invest in 10% of their operating revenue to search marketing for continuously 5 five years. The newly launched Bing.com really make quite a effort for new enhancements, one new thing is overlay site links shortcut, is Google site link now. Another good feature is the video preview in the search result. Haha but I still using google in my daily basis :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt is MS came out ahead. As from a recent news, MS decided to invest in 10% of their operating revenue to search marketing for continuously 5 five years. The newly launched Bing.com really make quite a effort for new enhancements, one new thing is overlay site links shortcut, is Google site link now. Another good feature is the video preview in the search result. Haha but I still using google in my daily basis <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jame</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-377243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-377243</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is very bad lately. Their search engine is very poor. I think this is a good chance for them to merge with microsoft to improve their competency. However, I don&#039;t think they can beat google in 2-3 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is very bad lately. Their search engine is very poor. I think this is a good chance for them to merge with microsoft to improve their competency. However, I don&#8217;t think they can beat google in 2-3 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick S</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-375729</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-375729</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is a hot mess. They have lots of users,  but could not execute.  

This is a good deal for both sides, but Yahoo is a sinking ship; so I think they needed this deal more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is a hot mess. They have lots of users,  but could not execute.  </p>
<p>This is a good deal for both sides, but Yahoo is a sinking ship; so I think they needed this deal more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecost</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-373992</link>
		<dc:creator>ecost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-373992</guid>
		<description>I believe, GOOGLE is all time winner of this game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe, GOOGLE is all time winner of this game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web-Surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-373956</link>
		<dc:creator>Web-Surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-373956</guid>
		<description>Microsoft promoted the chances on success, however they will not be able to resist! Google is out of area of reach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft promoted the chances on success, however they will not be able to resist! Google is out of area of reach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j. Chandler Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-373353</link>
		<dc:creator>j. Chandler Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-373353</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy...&quot;we&quot; did.  It seems Yahoo!&#039;s end was merely one of timing. I&#039;d rather have a re-invigorated MS search competitor helping tone Google&#039;s offerings, than Yahoo&#039;s at this point. Competition is good. We, the consumer, usually win when there is significant competition in any marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy&#8230;&#8221;we&#8221; did.  It seems Yahoo!&#8217;s end was merely one of timing. I&#8217;d rather have a re-invigorated MS search competitor helping tone Google&#8217;s offerings, than Yahoo&#8217;s at this point. Competition is good. We, the consumer, usually win when there is significant competition in any marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prathik Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-372684</link>
		<dc:creator>Prathik Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-372684</guid>
		<description>Google is not going to benefit shit from this. Yahoo users are in Yahoo because they hate google. Two things is going to happen, either the technology is going to combine and bing and yahoo search will be great, else search engines like ask, lycos, cuil etc.. will benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is not going to benefit shit from this. Yahoo users are in Yahoo because they hate google. Two things is going to happen, either the technology is going to combine and bing and yahoo search will be great, else search engines like ask, lycos, cuil etc.. will benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chen Jianfeng</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-372619</link>
		<dc:creator>Chen Jianfeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-372619</guid>
		<description>Mico and Yahoo&#039;s search experience is not poorer than Google . Yahoo was the best serach engine in the world before the born of google.But now ,google is better and better,and the most traffic search engine in the world.So the MSN unite Yahoo ,and they wanna be a unit to fight with google.but i am confident to google,as it is equal in the search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mico and Yahoo&#8217;s search experience is not poorer than Google . Yahoo was the best serach engine in the world before the born of google.But now ,google is better and better,and the most traffic search engine in the world.So the MSN unite Yahoo ,and they wanna be a unit to fight with google.but i am confident to google,as it is equal in the search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-371808</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-371808</guid>
		<description>I think Yahoo accepted that it&#039;s focus should not be on search, which is a very good thing. 
Accepting your faults is the first step (and maybe the only important step) to improving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Yahoo accepted that it&#8217;s focus should not be on search, which is a very good thing.<br />
Accepting your faults is the first step (and maybe the only important step) to improving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/microsoft-yahoo-deal/#comment-371799</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2870#comment-371799</guid>
		<description>From a competitive perspective, Microsoft is still telling the world it wants to be involved in the search engine game. Yahoo, while it recognizes the importance of it’s search component appears to be focusing more on the portal aspect. In my opinion, Microsoft is getting the better end of the deal only if Yahoo users are aware that Bing is the force behind the results and not Yahoo!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a competitive perspective, Microsoft is still telling the world it wants to be involved in the search engine game. Yahoo, while it recognizes the importance of it’s search component appears to be focusing more on the portal aspect. In my opinion, Microsoft is getting the better end of the deal only if Yahoo users are aware that Bing is the force behind the results and not Yahoo!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.603 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-20 08:47:03 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->