Comments on: Jagger3 update

By: stefan

stefan — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:17:51 +0000

today i noticed that my site got a good position in serps, for a long time was away

By: sivaiah

sivaiah — Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:42:43 +0000

Hi,

i have been doing optimization to my site for 6 months.
Just i want know why the results are showing differently if we search in google.com ang google.co.in.

In fact it’s showing better results in google.co.in than google.com
But our site is hosted in USA and the domain name end with .com.

So probably i could expecting better results in google.com instead of google.co.in.

Could you Please let me why the results are showing like this……….

Regards,
D.Siva

By: John Colascione

John Colascione — Wed, 03 May 2006 03:15:47 +0000

Hey Matt —- I’ve got a site for a client that has gone supplimental… I was expecting it to fix itself with some time, but seems like it is just not happening —– I know you can’t answer any specifics and your busy as ever, but this was the first place I thought of to get it to someone at Google that would know what I’m talking about…..

If you can squeeze a minuete take a look:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Awww.pearsonspromise.com

By: Very Worried

Very Worried — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:15:21 +0000

I am very worried. I am just getting started and looking for how to rank in Google and it looks like I am fighting an uphill battle with spam. Is this a if you can’t beat them join them kind of thing?

By: Arni

Arni — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:49:59 +0000

Hi Matt talking about spam cleanup have a look here
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:1mWHiWauGMsJ:www.touristikboerse.de/+touristikboerse.de&hl=de&lr=&strip=1

They are top in all Jaggers 1,2,3.

By: Rick Vidallon

Rick Vidallon — Sun, 20 Nov 2005 03:44:38 +0000

From what I’ve seen so far, Google has re-engineered several aspects of its algorithm. Amongst other aspects I will know as things roll out, I believe it has altered the impact of the following:
1. Value of incoming links
2. Value of anchor text in incoming links
3. Content on page of incoming links
4. Keyword repetitions in anchor text
5. Age of the incoming links
6. Nature of sites linking to you
7. Directory links
8. Speed and volume of incoming links created
9. Value of reciprocal links
10. Impact of outbound links / links page on your website
11. Sandbox effect / age of your site, domain registration date
12. Size of your site’s content
13. Addition and frequency of fresh content update
14. Canonical / sub domains, sub-sub domains
15. Multiple domains on same IP numbers
16. Duplicate content on same site or on multiple domains
17. Over-optimization, excessive text markup
18. Irrational use of CSS

The big question is when will this update finally filter down to all respective datacenters…any comments?

Thanks,
Rick
visionefx.net

By: Carol

Carol — Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:11:32 +0000

Didn’t mean to have an active link, was posting what I copied from a tool. Are we not supposed to post domain names here?
Carol

By: Carol

Carol — Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:04:44 +0000

Would this be a good indication of having canonical issues going on? I have no subdomains. If this is a canonical issue I have no idea how to fix it or why it is this way. I do know that when I publish with FrontPage that it publishes to the domain name without the www. Would I need to change that or does that depend on the host requirement? I did change hosts a couple of years ago also had to recover my frontpage off a crashed computer and it is possible that it got changed then. Probably too much info here. Sorry, just don’t know what would be needed.

Pages Indexed 644
(includes pages of EVERY subdomain, eg. *.forget-me-notgiftbaskets.com)

Pages Indexed 448
(includes pages of ONLY http://www.forget-me-notgiftbaskets.com)

Thanks,
Carol

By: Stan

Stan — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:00:05 +0000

Hey there,

I have a question. I own a website which has been listed on page 1 in google for all keywords relating to “Download Movies”, “DivX Movies”, etc… It was the official DivX search engine and information website.

Now since 25th of October I get no google traffic, my site has been completely dropped and even searching for its URL brings up 0 results, my page rank also went from 6/10 to 0, and all this happened overnight. This is by the way a daily updated website which has been up and running for over 5 years.

Any input would be much appreviated.
Stan.

By: Ross Brown

Ross Brown — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:19:02 +0000

Hi Matt,

You said you might ask for canonical name issues.

We have the site names nz.com and http://www.nz.com. nz.com was put up in 93 before the www prefix was used. We changed to use the prefix in the late 90s. Lots of people have linked to the site over the years and the links are split between the two names.

Last week we went from page 1 #8 for a key word search on New Zealand to page 2 and then back to page 1. Pre Jagger, the search returned the site nz.com (Page 1 #8). When on page 2, the http://www.nz.com site is returned. I checked tonight and we’re back on page 2 with http://www.nz.com. (I also checked on 66.102.9.104).

We’ve dropped 10 places. Obviously, I’d like to be back where we were (or higher). Anyway, I suspect that the older links to nz.com are not being given as much weight with the name change. So I’ve been thinking about changing the name back and dropping the www.

But then again, the naming might be a red herring. Most of the sites on page 1 and page 2 well-known, have lots of content etc.

So anyway, can you comment on this?

Regards,
Ross Brown