Comments on: Jagger winding down http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/ neat fun stuff Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:13:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Custom Essays http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-92341 Custom Essays Mon, 25 Dec 2006 12:35:16 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-92341 if I have many backlinks from one domain, for example there is a link that points to my site on every page of a domain and there are a 1,000 pages, will that trigger any 'link farm' filters? if I have many backlinks from one domain, for example there is a link that points to my site on every page of a domain and there are a 1,000 pages, will that trigger any ‘link farm’ filters?

]]> By: Custom Essays http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-90237 Custom Essays Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:51:57 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-90237 Quite intresting discussion going on which i really appreciate. Well duplicate page content is a big problem as several websites tend to copy the content of reliable information sources without references. Wat I need to ask from u people is that if i find such webpages that are copying my content without my permission and without a formal reference to my website what shoul i do? Secondly if a website places my content with a formal reference to my website how advantageous or disadvantagous it is ? Quite intresting discussion going on which i really appreciate. Well duplicate page content is a big problem as several websites tend to copy the content of reliable information sources without references. Wat I need to ask from u people is that if i find such webpages that are copying my content without my permission and without a formal reference to my website what shoul i do? Secondly if a website places my content with a formal reference to my website how advantageous or disadvantagous it is ?

]]> By: Tomi Häsä http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-7073 Tomi Häsä Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:45:03 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-7073 The Jagger Update was completed around November 18th according to http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-little-301-that-could/ The Jagger Update was completed around November 18th according to http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/the-little-301-that-could/

]]> By: Andrew http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-6677 Andrew Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:11:56 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-6677 Few days ago, few spamming sites that were removed during jagger, have been listed back again. The sites have hundreds of doorway pages, hidden texts, mirror sites, duplicate contents and stuffing keywords. I wrote several times since then but no response. It's disappointed to see these sites coming back and taking over top spots in google and spaming hundreds of SERP's after being caught already by google. I am not sure what say here. Few days ago, few spamming sites that were removed during jagger, have been listed back again. The sites have hundreds of doorway pages, hidden texts, mirror sites, duplicate contents and stuffing keywords. I wrote several times since then but no response.

It’s disappointed to see these sites coming back and taking over top spots in google and spaming hundreds of SERP’s after being caught already by google.

I am not sure what say here.

]]> By: SEO post Jagger http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-5806 SEO post Jagger Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:12:43 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-5806 I've seen a lot of complaints by web site owners in quite a few forums, but in all honesty, the sites that are having problems are pretty much only those that have little or no natural (not reciprocal or directory links) inbound links. I think Jagger was a good update & hopefully it removed a lot of the garbage on the internet. I’ve seen a lot of complaints by web site owners in quite a few forums, but in all honesty, the sites that are having problems are pretty much only those that have little or no natural (not reciprocal or directory links) inbound links.

I think Jagger was a good update & hopefully it removed a lot of the garbage on the internet.

]]> By: Star http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-5398 Star Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:08:53 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-5398 I have never met that many self-centered jerks. Do you guys think the world evolves around you and your sites ? "When will Google do what webmasters want ?" LOL Get real ! Bye I have never met that many self-centered jerks.

Do you guys think the world evolves around you and your sites ?

“When will Google do what webmasters want ?” LOL

Get real !

Bye

]]> By: Ted Z http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-5267 Ted Z Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:35:54 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-5267 Hey Matt! Looks like the roller coaster ride is over. What do you say? Can we go back to our knitting? Maybe you should start a "Name the Update" blog...... Cheers, Ted Hey Matt!

Looks like the roller coaster ride is over. What do you say? Can we go back to our knitting?

Maybe you should start a “Name the Update” blog……

Cheers,
Ted

]]> By: Carol http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-4992 Carol Sat, 26 Nov 2005 23:13:38 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-4992 When will this really end? I am still seeing jumps of over 9,000 up and down still for keywords, some up, mostly down. Some keywords I had regained some fair ranking for are down today. Carol When will this really end? I am still seeing jumps of over 9,000 up and down still for keywords, some up, mostly down. Some keywords I had regained some fair ranking for are down today.
Carol

]]> By: Luke http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-4920 Luke Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:02:15 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-4920 Hi Matt, The Google result: http://www.google.com/search?q=www.mattcutts.com&btnG=Search Still says: "Sorry, no information is available for the URL www.mattcutts.com" But: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.mattcutts.com&btnG=Search returns many pages! This exact thing has happened to our site (see my email address) where there are no results for our home page, but the site: command returns all our pages - including our home page (albeit with a DMOZ description) !!! Why is Google not matching our home page to a query for that page - what do you think is happening? Is this the same situation as you have? Luke Hi Matt,

The Google result: http://www.google.com/search?q=www.mattcutts.com&btnG=Search

Still says: “Sorry, no information is available for the URL http://www.mattcutts.com”

But: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.mattcutts.com&btnG=Search

returns many pages!

This exact thing has happened to our site (see my email address) where there are no results for our home page, but the site: command returns all our pages – including our home page (albeit with a DMOZ description) !!!

Why is Google not matching our home page to a query for that page – what do you think is happening? Is this the same situation as you have?

Luke

]]> By: SuperiorPapers http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/jagger-winding-down/#comment-4769 SuperiorPapers Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:38:18 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=88#comment-4769 Matt, Thanks for all the information you provide here, it is much appreciated. This might not be exactly related to Jagger3 but still, it deals with Google webmaster guidelines and such, hence we decided to ask it here. We were trying to figure out why our site ranks poorly and while analyzing different issues came across a site that stole our design and on one page even copied our text word by word - so thouroughly that they even forgot to replace our domain mentioned in the text with their own! - is there any need for better proof of duplicate content and who's the one duplicating it? (Infact, after some more research, we've found out that they have two exactly identical sites on two different domains, both of them copying our text on their FAQ page with our domain name there). I have submitted spam reports to Google through the page you refer us to in this post - is there anything else I need to do in this case and what will be the result - will the violating sites be removed from the index and how soon can this happen? Thanks. Matt,

Thanks for all the information you provide here, it is much appreciated.

This might not be exactly related to Jagger3 but still, it deals with Google webmaster guidelines and such, hence we decided to ask it here. We were trying to figure out why our site ranks poorly and while analyzing different issues came across a site that stole our design and on one page even copied our text word by word – so thouroughly that they even forgot to replace our domain mentioned in the text with their own! – is there any need for better proof of duplicate content and who’s the one duplicating it? (Infact, after some more research, we’ve found out that they have two exactly identical sites on two different domains, both of them copying our text on their FAQ page with our domain name there). I have submitted spam reports to Google through the page you refer us to in this post – is there anything else I need to do in this case and what will be the result – will the violating sites be removed from the index and how soon can this happen? Thanks.

]]>