Comments on: Internet Librarian blog

By: kız oyunları

kız oyunları — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:24:38 +0000

Entertaining

By: lazer epilasyon

lazer epilasyon — Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:49:56 +0000

but you are more lucky than me

By: Chung

Chung — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:43:32 +0000

I just wished I lived in United States, there the internet is so common, here in Italy the internet era has still to come. You Luckisters!

By: Harith

Harith — Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:07:20 +0000

Good morning Matt

Hopefully you have enjoyed the weekend.

Any weather report about Jagger3 ? Is Wednesday 2nd November still Jagger3 day

Have a great day and a successful week.

By: Aaron Pratt

Aaron Pratt — Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:40:29 +0000

Wouldn’t it be cool if we could post our own pages in Matts blog while he is away for the weekend?

Heh

(What interesting things will he write about this coming week? I visit this place as much as I visit my favorite forums now, pretty cool!)

Cheers,

-Aaron

By: Harith

Harith — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:42:13 +0000

Hi Matt

Subject: LinkExchange Networks

Writing about spam on a sunday morning

We all know that those networks are there to create very artificial reciprocal linking for one purpose only: manupulate serach engines including big G. And such networks should be considered as spam nests.

However when looking at Google´s spam reporting page there is no indications that Google considers those spam networks as spam that should be reported. Take a look:

http://www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html

Type(s) of problem (check all that apply):
Hidden text or links
Misleading or repeated words
Page does not match Google’s description
Cloaked page
Deceptive redirects
Doorway pages
Duplicate site or pages
Other (specify)

My question is, why not add another option, something like:

LinkExchange Network

Such option will signal that Google does consider the said networks as spam.

Thoughts?

Wish you a great Sunday.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 03:50:38 +0000

That looks like it would be a good conference to go to. It is neat to read the blog report about the librarians. I have a frind that is a librarians in Dallas and they seem to be doing more and more online now.

By: Arleen Harry

Arleen Harry — Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:35:16 +0000

I have read articles and feel I have done everything to get Google to index my site.

My site has been up since the 90’s. I just had the site completely redesigned 2 months ago. We created 301 redirects to the new pages. We are still using the old domain. Google doesn’t recognize that I have over 2500 pages in my new site. I have been paying high prices for SEO companies to the tune of over $100,000.00. So far I don’t see much results. From use of keywords, copywriting, backward linking etc. We also created a Google site map for the new site.

I am frustrated as this is livelihood. If there is anything that you could suggest that I am doing wrong I would really appreciate it. I get hit by Googlebot about Googlebot 76 hits for this week.
I have over 141,000 in bound links 19 70 in Google 1970 in hotbot, 121,047 in MSN and 16,400 in Yahoo
I just can’t understand it.

I would appreciate any suggestions

Regards,
Arleen

By: Dave Anderson

Dave Anderson — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:30:04 +0000

My girlfriend and many of our friends were at the conference, and the reports I got was that it was one of the best library conferences of the year. Of course, spending a week in Monterey is no great hardship either.

As I understand it, the conference will be in Monterey again next year. I’m sure you could convince them to let google host a reception, if not one of the sessions.

By: GaryTheScubaGuy

GaryTheScubaGuy — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:54:13 +0000

Let us know if you find the Magic Pumpkin…oops. Sorry man, didn’t mean to drop the ball on you.

Here, I’ll give you a hint where to find him and you might change your mind and go to Monterey… http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00009EIQH.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

lol…I’d rethink

cya!