Comments on: Infrastructure status, January 2007 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/ neat fun stuff Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:13:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: sohbet http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-436651 sohbet Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:53:16 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-436651 thnxxx thnxxx

]]> By: software development services http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-394371 software development services Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:25:25 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-394371 Thanks i would like to share about infrastructure development services nowadays all the IT companies are jumped into infrastructure development because the customers should need proper delivery from the services. Thanks i would like to share about infrastructure development services nowadays all the IT companies are jumped into infrastructure development because the customers should need proper delivery from the services.

]]> By: samsung bluetooth headset http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-391856 samsung bluetooth headset Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:02:09 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-391856 I have come across many websites and blogs whose page rank is 5 or even 6 but their content is not so good comparatively, while I have also seen many blogs and websites whose page rank is low but has great content. I also don't believe in page rank. I have come across many websites and blogs whose page rank is 5 or even 6 but their content is not so good comparatively, while I have also seen many blogs and websites whose page rank is low but has great content. I also don’t believe in page rank.

]]> By: Pryde http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-127131 Pryde Tue, 13 May 2008 21:27:55 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-127131 When should we expect to see a new PR update? It seems that when my PR goes up, so do my rankings... in this, it is not clear to me how PR is an ongoing cycle and should not create a new Google position. Any word on that? When should we expect to see a new PR update? It seems that when my PR goes up, so do my rankings… in this, it is not clear to me how PR is an ongoing cycle and should not create a new Google position. Any word on that?

]]> By: Generico http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-119858 Generico Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:06:46 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-119858 I hate the supplemental results, I wish Google would instead show random results that are a bit different each time rather than punish sites in that other index which seems to still be in place 1-1-08 Maybe the future of search will be more niche orientated instead of banishing sites into the dark supplemental pit to rot for 8 months with zero traffic... very unfair indeed. I hate the supplemental results, I wish Google would instead show random results that are a bit different each time rather than punish sites in that other index which seems to still be in place 1-1-08
Maybe the future of search will be more niche orientated instead of banishing sites into the dark supplemental pit to rot for 8 months with zero traffic… very unfair indeed.

]]> By: Offshore http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-119551 Offshore Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:03:24 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-119551 No dissrespect to Matt, he is good at articulating things so people can understand them, but I don't think he has it accurate .. google is still sandboxing and has some sort of supplimental results that you can get stuck into from duplicate content, etc. PR is still important because it gives people trust.. like a name brand No dissrespect to Matt, he is good at articulating things so people can understand them, but I don’t think he has it accurate .. google is still sandboxing and has some sort of supplimental results that you can get stuck into from duplicate content, etc. PR is still important because it gives people trust.. like a name brand

]]> By: Lukas http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118368 Lukas Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:17:47 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118368 Search engine ranking is more important than PR because every webmaster wants visitors Search engine ranking is more important than PR because every webmaster wants visitors

]]> By: SEO Champion http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118343 SEO Champion Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:05:41 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118343 matt, thanks for clearing up the issue about supplemental results. you know it's disappointing when you see your blood and sweat put into supplemental pages. but at least now this is quite a good news. matt,

thanks for clearing up the issue about supplemental results. you know it’s disappointing when you see your blood and sweat put into supplemental pages. but at least now this is quite a good news.

]]> By: seo http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118292 seo Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:51:20 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118292 Is it true that pagerank may soon be gone? Is it true that pagerank may soon be gone?

]]> By: Modeling http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118266 Modeling Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:56:22 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/infrastructure-status-january-2007/#comment-118266 page title is almost irrlevent these days it seems page title is almost irrlevent these days it seems

]]>