<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indexing timeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:52:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gouri</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-388868</link>
		<dc:creator>Gouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-388868</guid>
		<description>In google search, I can find results which were published just minutes before. Whereas, in case of my blog, I can see my posts indexed only after a few days. This problem has started from my second post onwards. My first post was indexed &amp; available in google search within few minutes of publishing. Is this due some setting problem with my XML map or robots.txt plugin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In google search, I can find results which were published just minutes before. Whereas, in case of my blog, I can see my posts indexed only after a few days. This problem has started from my second post onwards. My first post was indexed &amp; available in google search within few minutes of publishing. Is this due some setting problem with my XML map or robots.txt plugin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perplexed</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-379489</link>
		<dc:creator>Perplexed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-379489</guid>
		<description>Matt / All

There seem to be many  sites that Google has not re-indexed for months and in some cases years, resulting in inaccurate information appearing in the results (snippet descriptions).  These seem to be especially prevalent with domain information web sites, including
 	
http://www.souv.net/whois-com/ip-address/domain.com
http://www.who.is/whois/
http://whois.domaintools.com
http://www.domaincrawler.com/domains/view/

For example when performing the following search

DotCorner.com  last update date site:http://www.souv.net/whois-com/ip-address/

The snippet text reads: 

Jul 24, 2008 ... Last Update Date: 2007-09-05. Name Servers: ... Registration Service Provided By: DotCorner.com. Contact: ...

The live page shows 

Last Update Date: 2008-09-07

Indicating that Google has not re-indexed the page for at least 11 months.  

As a result there are many cases where performing a name search on an individual shows up domains that the individual may have owned years ago.  In my case, Google is showing me as the owner of  domains which now either contain explicit content or names suggesting explicit content.  

Is there a reason for this, and what can be done to fix the issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt / All</p>
<p>There seem to be many  sites that Google has not re-indexed for months and in some cases years, resulting in inaccurate information appearing in the results (snippet descriptions).  These seem to be especially prevalent with domain information web sites, including</p>
<p><a href="http://www.souv.net/whois-com/ip-address/domain.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.souv.net/whois-com/ip-address/domain.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.who.is/whois/" rel="nofollow">http://www.who.is/whois/</a><br />
<a href="http://whois.domaintools.com" rel="nofollow">http://whois.domaintools.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.domaincrawler.com/domains/view/" rel="nofollow">http://www.domaincrawler.com/domains/view/</a></p>
<p>For example when performing the following search</p>
<p>DotCorner.com  last update date site:http://www.souv.net/whois-com/ip-address/</p>
<p>The snippet text reads: </p>
<p>Jul 24, 2008 &#8230; Last Update Date: 2007-09-05. Name Servers: &#8230; Registration Service Provided By: DotCorner.com. Contact: &#8230;</p>
<p>The live page shows </p>
<p>Last Update Date: 2008-09-07</p>
<p>Indicating that Google has not re-indexed the page for at least 11 months.  </p>
<p>As a result there are many cases where performing a name search on an individual shows up domains that the individual may have owned years ago.  In my case, Google is showing me as the owner of  domains which now either contain explicit content or names suggesting explicit content.  </p>
<p>Is there a reason for this, and what can be done to fix the issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victorantos</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-181182</link>
		<dc:creator>victorantos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-181182</guid>
		<description>Great!
So relevant inlinks are always welcome, but what if I as a web developer sign my developed websites with a footer link to my personal website?
How does this affect my clients websites?
How does this affect my personal website?
Is this a good practice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!<br />
So relevant inlinks are always welcome, but what if I as a web developer sign my developed websites with a footer link to my personal website?<br />
How does this affect my clients websites?<br />
How does this affect my personal website?<br />
Is this a good practice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rika Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-123459</link>
		<dc:creator>Rika Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-123459</guid>
		<description>Matt, why does it happen that Google sometimes seem to go through a phase of picking up the wrong pages for a site? At the moment I am experiencing this in almost every instance with my site (linked in my name). For example, I would do a search for &#039;Joe Weider Pro 9635 Home Gym&#039; (I have an full-length post about that), but the listing in Google is for my page on the Joe Weider 1120 Home Gym. I can give numerous similar examples. 

This has now been going on for about 2 or 3 weeks and has been affecting my listings severely. It is extremely frustrating and is causing a significant drop in income. I haven&#039;t done anything strange on the site just before it occurred. My posts are all written by myself - no duplicate content issues. No black hat SEO. It would be great if I could understand why this happens. Is there anything I can do to get my very steady, relevant listings back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, why does it happen that Google sometimes seem to go through a phase of picking up the wrong pages for a site? At the moment I am experiencing this in almost every instance with my site (linked in my name). For example, I would do a search for &#8216;Joe Weider Pro 9635 Home Gym&#8217; (I have an full-length post about that), but the listing in Google is for my page on the Joe Weider 1120 Home Gym. I can give numerous similar examples. </p>
<p>This has now been going on for about 2 or 3 weeks and has been affecting my listings severely. It is extremely frustrating and is causing a significant drop in income. I haven&#8217;t done anything strange on the site just before it occurred. My posts are all written by myself &#8211; no duplicate content issues. No black hat SEO. It would be great if I could understand why this happens. Is there anything I can do to get my very steady, relevant listings back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: constantine</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-120206</link>
		<dc:creator>constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-120206</guid>
		<description>What does exactly Natural Text Link stand for ? Regular link ? Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does exactly Natural Text Link stand for ? Regular link ? Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-119986</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-119986</guid>
		<description>I am very interested in the question of linking and how it affects the positions in SERPS. I agree that relevant links are required for good positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very interested in the question of linking and how it affects the positions in SERPS. I agree that relevant links are required for good positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Gervelis</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-116802</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Gervelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-116802</guid>
		<description>some of this stuff sounds like no-brainers! Why would a real estate site link to a quit smoking site? Can you say RED FLAG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of this stuff sounds like no-brainers! Why would a real estate site link to a quit smoking site? Can you say RED FLAG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakeback</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-115347</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakeback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-115347</guid>
		<description>Coding has nothing to do with page rank. And i think most everyone agrees by now that the green toolbar that shows PR is pretty meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coding has nothing to do with page rank. And i think most everyone agrees by now that the green toolbar that shows PR is pretty meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Zimnicaru</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-114031</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Zimnicaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-114031</guid>
		<description>Natural Link Text it&#039;s something that google should always count. This will make the difference between “click here” billions and billions of links over the internet. SEO professionals know this and they always advice using Natural Link Text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natural Link Text it&#8217;s something that google should always count. This will make the difference between “click here” billions and billions of links over the internet. SEO professionals know this and they always advice using Natural Link Text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/#comment-112022</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=310#comment-112022</guid>
		<description>It is evident that many disregard the quality of sites they reciprocal link exchange with.  While they think that all those links help their ranking it can really have a negative ranking. Am I right? What about submitting to directories. What is Google&#039;s stand on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is evident that many disregard the quality of sites they reciprocal link exchange with.  While they think that all those links help their ranking it can really have a negative ranking. Am I right? What about submitting to directories. What is Google&#8217;s stand on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
