<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google improves search for fresh documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intermediate_Searcher</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-196970</link>
		<dc:creator>Intermediate_Searcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-196970</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this blog is still being monitored, but with fingers crossed, I&#039;ll give a comment a shot!

I&#039;d like to see (or know how, if already available) this feature made available to use directly from the search bar, such as other advanced operators are:   site:   inrul:    link:

Having this available from the search bar is MUCH faster than going to advanced page and clicking several times to get the mod. I want for my search terms. TRES inconvenient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this blog is still being monitored, but with fingers crossed, I&#8217;ll give a comment a shot!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see (or know how, if already available) this feature made available to use directly from the search bar, such as other advanced operators are:   site:   inrul:    link:</p>
<p>Having this available from the search bar is MUCH faster than going to advanced page and clicking several times to get the mod. I want for my search terms. TRES inconvenient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Nature Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108543</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Nature Photos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108543</guid>
		<description>I have seen evidence of that for my site as well...I created pages, and within 3 days, they are in the top 10. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen evidence of that for my site as well&#8230;I created pages, and within 3 days, they are in the top 10. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egorych</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108363</link>
		<dc:creator>egorych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108363</guid>
		<description>To my mind it&#039;s a good feature because the main part of users would like not to read old articles but to find more fresh and that&#039;s why useful information. For example blog search by Google. All newest information in any sphere. Nice upgrade, bloggers would like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my mind it&#8217;s a good feature because the main part of users would like not to read old articles but to find more fresh and that&#8217;s why useful information. For example blog search by Google. All newest information in any sphere. Nice upgrade, bloggers would like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dog Clothing Company</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dog Clothing Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-108353</guid>
		<description>Forgive my stupidity. Why am I not seeing that option?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my stupidity. Why am I not seeing that option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richly Scented Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-107476</link>
		<dc:creator>Richly Scented Candles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-107476</guid>
		<description>This is a very useful feature. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very useful feature. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-107137</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-107137</guid>
		<description>Matt, This is a great feature.

It would be nice if Google displayed not only the &quot;past 3 months&quot;, &quot;past 6 months&quot;, and &quot;past year&quot; but a time value. This would be very valueable to webmaster to know where their site has been shown in the past week, day, etc.

Does this feature exist?

I tried to change it manually and got a &quot;The date restriction was dropped from your search because it is not supported for this type of search. &quot;

Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, This is a great feature.</p>
<p>It would be nice if Google displayed not only the &#8220;past 3 months&#8221;, &#8220;past 6 months&#8221;, and &#8220;past year&#8221; but a time value. This would be very valueable to webmaster to know where their site has been shown in the past week, day, etc.</p>
<p>Does this feature exist?</p>
<p>I tried to change it manually and got a &#8220;The date restriction was dropped from your search because it is not supported for this type of search. &#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rene</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106928</link>
		<dc:creator>rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106928</guid>
		<description>Matt, is it possible to eplain the effect of sitelinks. (sublinks under a search result)

I know it is done completely automatic, but is there a way to code the website so it get&#039;s that effect (or make the chance more likely)

Thanks,
Rene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, is it possible to eplain the effect of sitelinks. (sublinks under a search result)</p>
<p>I know it is done completely automatic, but is there a way to code the website so it get&#8217;s that effect (or make the chance more likely)</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Rene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lidija Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106909</link>
		<dc:creator>Lidija Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106909</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

Thank you for this.  

I use search a lot throughout my day and it is terrific to have Google trying to work it all out for us (someone needs to), however, I’m intrigued in the results page when using date search.  

For instance: 

Today, searching for “Barbara Coll” without specifying a date range results in this:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=all&amp;btnG=Search 

Searching for the same name, specifying the past three months gives me this: (Which, of course, is way more relevant).

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=m3 

However, I am a little confused about the order, given:

- My post, tagged BC went in June 10, BC’s June 14
- My blog is much younger than WebMama’s 
- BC blogs using Blogger, I use WordPress

Although I’ve been using search engines forever, I’ve only recently begun trying to understand SEO, so I hope you forgive stupid questions. :-)

Why does my tag and post come up before hers?  I would have expected it the other way around.

Don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that my results are there, also LOVE the ability to search by date (long standing whine of mine) – just a little confused in how it all fits together and why.  

I would love your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Thank you for this.  </p>
<p>I use search a lot throughout my day and it is terrific to have Google trying to work it all out for us (someone needs to), however, I’m intrigued in the results page when using date search.  </p>
<p>For instance: </p>
<p>Today, searching for “Barbara Coll” without specifying a date range results in this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=all&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=all&amp;btnG=Search</a> </p>
<p>Searching for the same name, specifying the past three months gives me this: (Which, of course, is way more relevant).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=m3" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;as_qdr=m3&amp;q=barbara+coll&amp;as_qdr=m3</a> </p>
<p>However, I am a little confused about the order, given:</p>
<p>- My post, tagged BC went in June 10, BC’s June 14<br />
- My blog is much younger than WebMama’s<br />
- BC blogs using Blogger, I use WordPress</p>
<p>Although I’ve been using search engines forever, I’ve only recently begun trying to understand SEO, so I hope you forgive stupid questions. <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Why does my tag and post come up before hers?  I would have expected it the other way around.</p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that my results are there, also LOVE the ability to search by date (long standing whine of mine) – just a little confused in how it all fits together and why.  </p>
<p>I would love your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106870</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Practices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106870</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, that&#039;s another factor for Google to rank sites.  Where do I find this option?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, that&#8217;s another factor for Google to rank sites.  Where do I find this option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106796</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-improves-search-for-fresh-documents/#comment-106796</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Does that mean that new pages in new sites also get better chances in this type of search? :)

I guess not, since the spammers would have a wonderful time there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Does that mean that new pages in new sites also get better chances in this type of search? <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I guess not, since the spammers would have a wonderful time there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
