<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Ten things I don&#8217;t like about Google Chrome</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Kish</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-842662</link> <dc:creator>Kish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:18:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-842662</guid> <description>I still don&#039;t know if chrome has auto suggest from history like firefox (LOVE this in firefox) I have several development machines that don&#039;t have domain names. So in Firefox I simply type in one digit, and it shows up in the autosuggest from my history. I don&#039;t see that in Chrome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t know if chrome has auto suggest from history like firefox (LOVE this in firefox)<br /> I have several development machines that don&#8217;t have domain names. So in Firefox I simply type in one digit, and it shows up in the autosuggest from my history. I don&#8217;t see that in Chrome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anton</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-703231</link> <dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-703231</guid> <description>By far the most annoying for me: The context menu on any web page accepts t as the shortcut for opening a link in a new tab. I&#039;ve become used to that now, so every now and again I press t from the context menu on the bookmarks bar to open all the pages in new tabs, but alas this deletes the folder. So t in the context menu sometimes means open in new tab, but other times it means delete. This is especially annoying when you&#039;re spent hours researching something and have saved all the tabs in a neat folder to continue later.I know the whole idea of a context menu is that it changes depending on where the cursor is (hence the term context), but it still feels strange, especially seeing as middle-click on a mouse achieves the desired result in both cases.Secondary to that, it would be nice to get a &quot;Are you sure?&quot; type confirmation when you delete a bookmarks folder with a bunch of bookmarks in it that you&#039;ve worked really hard to accumulate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By far the most annoying for me: The context menu on any web page accepts t as the shortcut for opening a link in a new tab. I&#8217;ve become used to that now, so every now and again I press t from the context menu on the bookmarks bar to open all the pages in new tabs, but alas this deletes the folder. So t in the context menu sometimes means open in new tab, but other times it means delete. This is especially annoying when you&#8217;re spent hours researching something and have saved all the tabs in a neat folder to continue later.</p><p>I know the whole idea of a context menu is that it changes depending on where the cursor is (hence the term context), but it still feels strange, especially seeing as middle-click on a mouse achieves the desired result in both cases.</p><p>Secondary to that, it would be nice to get a &#8220;Are you sure?&#8221; type confirmation when you delete a bookmarks folder with a bunch of bookmarks in it that you&#8217;ve worked really hard to accumulate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raghuttam</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-612293</link> <dc:creator>Raghuttam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:39:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-612293</guid> <description>why cant tou see the download speed while downloading stuff on google chrome?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why cant tou see the download speed while downloading stuff on google chrome?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Flores</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-547448</link> <dc:creator>Flores</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 05:53:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-547448</guid> <description>What I do not like&quot; are:1.  Very hard to control flash and other video files. I even cannot enlarge or make a full view of video such as YouTube in Chrome.2. I cannot control or block flash adds with any plugin or addson.3. Very hard to scroll up and down in many websites.4. When we copy a file, it copies all, included background and shading.Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I do not like&#8221; are:</p><p>1.  Very hard to control flash and other video files. I even cannot enlarge or make a full view of video such as YouTube in Chrome.</p><p>2. I cannot control or block flash adds with any plugin or addson.</p><p>3. Very hard to scroll up and down in many websites.</p><p>4. When we copy a file, it copies all, included background and shading.</p><p>Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raiflek</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-531357</link> <dc:creator>Raiflek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-531357</guid> <description>Still wanting the save-as fix (from Summervillain, 2008): &quot;If I do a save-as to some location, I would like the next save-as in the same tab/session to default to the last-used location Chrome’s password manager doesn’t recognize/offer to remember some of the sites that Firefox’s password manager does&quot;Does anyone know of a fix?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still wanting the save-as fix (from Summervillain, 2008): &#8220;If I do a save-as to some location, I would like the next save-as in the same tab/session to default to the last-used location<br /> Chrome’s password manager doesn’t recognize/offer to remember some of the sites that Firefox’s password manager does&#8221;</p><p>Does anyone know of a fix?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gxg</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-520388</link> <dc:creator>gxg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:47:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-520388</guid> <description>A centralized way to set preferences (the equivalent of Firefox’s about:config) would be most welcomed. Using commend line flags can be very obscure, especially to less experienced users. Unfortunately I don&#039;t see any initiative in that direction...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A centralized way to set preferences (the equivalent of Firefox’s about:config) would be most welcomed. Using commend line flags can be very obscure, especially to less experienced users. Unfortunately I don&#8217;t see any initiative in that direction&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin L</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-511858</link> <dc:creator>Martin L</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-511858</guid> <description>Choosing where the Chrome cache directory resides would be beneficial to some users - it&#039;s possible in Firefox, Opera, and even IE.I can understand some of the reasons for installing Chrome on Windows in the user profile, but why does my cache-less Chrome consume 190MB of disk space in this area, yet Opera 10.51 on the same machine takes 13MB?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing where the Chrome cache directory resides would be beneficial to some users &#8211; it&#8217;s possible in Firefox, Opera, and even IE.</p><p>I can understand some of the reasons for installing Chrome on Windows in the user profile, but why does my cache-less Chrome consume 190MB of disk space in this area, yet Opera 10.51 on the same machine takes 13MB?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brandon</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-473756</link> <dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-473756</guid> <description>I like the speed of the browser, but it needs more add ons and tool bar features. Too beta for me right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the speed of the browser, but it needs more add ons and tool bar features. Too beta for me right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MikeB</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-463982</link> <dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:44:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-463982</guid> <description>At least as an option: new tab = home page!  I have a home page for a reason.Opening an image that didn&#039;t show up in a new tab sounds a lot like it&#039;s supposed to be a kludgy workaround.  I actually write code like that but not if I&#039;m handing it out anywhere, it&#039;s crude.If I close the last tab, it should show a new tab, a blank tab or nothing.Let me rename &quot;Other Bookmarks&quot; (I want to get rid of &quot;Other&quot;) and move it up with everything else.  I already have bookmarks, why do I want more on the bookmark bar?  I don&#039;t, but I have to have the whole bar showing to get reasonably quick access to my bookmarks.  Lots of wasted screen real-estate there.Open Chrome, open anything else.  Right-click the taskbar and pick either tile option.  Is Chrome a phantom window?Min/max/close are the wrong size and in the wrong place.It simply doesn&#039;t behave or look like anything else.  Please note that&#039;s NOT a compliment.I&#039;ve got multi-user operating systems that take up less space than Chrome (OK, they&#039;re not current, but they are fully functional) does for a single user.  Add another user, there goes another 100+MBs.  The ability to install Chrome as an app (in Program Files!) with multiple profiles would be great.  I&#039;m not saying replace the current method (dumbing down users is always a good idea, makes them more gullible) but as an alternative.Does skinning really have to require resource hacking?  I mean, seriously.Gives up too easily when it can&#039;t get a file.  Maybe it&#039;s a timeout kicking in, I don&#039;t know.  I DO know that I have to reload a page or &quot;open image in new tab&quot; a LOT.I&#039;m researching replacements for IE6 since web sites are starting to drop support for it.  Although I&#039;ve had fun playing with it, Chrome feels like a beta (at best) to me.  It does not feel like it&#039;s ready for normal users.  It doesn&#039;t behave like an app should and, while simplicity is nice, you can carve out too much.  I&#039;ll simply have to drop it from the list of maybes.And I had such hope...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least as an option: new tab = home page!  I have a home page for a reason.</p><p>Opening an image that didn&#8217;t show up in a new tab sounds a lot like it&#8217;s supposed to be a kludgy workaround.  I actually write code like that but not if I&#8217;m handing it out anywhere, it&#8217;s crude.</p><p>If I close the last tab, it should show a new tab, a blank tab or nothing.</p><p>Let me rename &#8220;Other Bookmarks&#8221; (I want to get rid of &#8220;Other&#8221;) and move it up with everything else.  I already have bookmarks, why do I want more on the bookmark bar?  I don&#8217;t, but I have to have the whole bar showing to get reasonably quick access to my bookmarks.  Lots of wasted screen real-estate there.</p><p>Open Chrome, open anything else.  Right-click the taskbar and pick either tile option.  Is Chrome a phantom window?</p><p>Min/max/close are the wrong size and in the wrong place.</p><p>It simply doesn&#8217;t behave or look like anything else.  Please note that&#8217;s NOT a compliment.</p><p>I&#8217;ve got multi-user operating systems that take up less space than Chrome (OK, they&#8217;re not current, but they are fully functional) does for a single user.  Add another user, there goes another 100+MBs.  The ability to install Chrome as an app (in Program Files!) with multiple profiles would be great.  I&#8217;m not saying replace the current method (dumbing down users is always a good idea, makes them more gullible) but as an alternative.</p><p>Does skinning really have to require resource hacking?  I mean, seriously.</p><p>Gives up too easily when it can&#8217;t get a file.  Maybe it&#8217;s a timeout kicking in, I don&#8217;t know.  I DO know that I have to reload a page or &#8220;open image in new tab&#8221; a LOT.</p><p>I&#8217;m researching replacements for IE6 since web sites are starting to drop support for it.  Although I&#8217;ve had fun playing with it, Chrome feels like a beta (at best) to me.  It does not feel like it&#8217;s ready for normal users.  It doesn&#8217;t behave like an app should and, while simplicity is nice, you can carve out too much.  I&#8217;ll simply have to drop it from the list of maybes.</p><p>And I had such hope&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony Heywood</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-annoyances/#comment-462247</link> <dc:creator>Tony Heywood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:40:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-462247</guid> <description>I have still issues with hard refresh in Chrome. Is this something that has been sorted out now.I am trying to get a hard refresh on this pagehttp://www.flip.co.ukIt now has a video imbedded and I can&#039;t see it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have still issues with hard refresh in Chrome. Is this something that has been sorted out now.</p><p>I am trying to get a hard refresh on this page</p><p><a href="http://www.flip.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.flip.co.uk</a></p><p>It now has a video imbedded and I can&#8217;t see it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 23:35:46 -->
