<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gary Price joins Ask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-14029</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-14029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again no offense to Matt or Google but I have to agree competition is good. I dont believe Google will EVER have a real reason to follow its own guidelines and mission statement until of Do No Evil until there is some competition out there for them and at this time there isnt. The one statement I will always remember from my father, we all know that most of us males didnt listen to our fathers because what could they know that we didnt already is &quot; The same people you see going up that ladder of success, you will see coming right back down it&quot;

I would say that the first SE that can set guidelines for webmaster, follow those guidelines and hold all to the same set of standards no matter how small or large you are as a company, brand themselves, try and become a friend to the webmaster community as Matt is trying to and most important rid their engine of spam will be the search engine that propels its way to the top market share. To poke a little fun also the first SE that gets rid of DMOZ :)

Right now Google is not following its own mission statement of Do No Evil, they are trying but have shown that they will turn a blind eye to spam that is sitting in front of them. Matt/ Google is trying to relate to the webmaster community to build a strong relationship but hasnt shown it can act yet on all the advice this community is offering. Its almost like if you want to protect your home, hire a thief the build you a security system. Google has had some effect on spam but has not addressed what has been placed directly in front of them with spam and this sets an example that leads spammers to believe that Google might overlook these tactics if it is in Googles best interest.

Yahoo doesnt know what they are doing. Yahoo seems to be a bit confused. Yahoo is trying to impliment aspects from Google and MSN. Yahoo however has applied a set of standards that they seem to hold ALL TO and not just SOME, so for this they score the top grade above all search engines. As for Yahoo branding, it seems they lack the ability to market themselves to the mass public and have all but given up to compete with Google.

MSN, now this is IMHO right now is the only company that has the ability to compete with Google. MSN is still miles behind Google but they are working to create a SE that offers more relevancy than Google does at this present moment. MSN has the same problem though of addressing spam as Google does. Even though IMO MSN results are more relevant than Google&#039;s, MSN results contain a lot of sites in the top of their serps that use spam techniques and I dont believe that they have the ability yet for their bot to detect a lot of spam. As for branding IMO again I forsee MSN as being the only company that has the financial backing to brand their name beyond what Google has already achieived for internet search. With a few buyouts here and there by both MSN and Google it should make the future of both search engines very interesting.

Maybe a company such as Ask can come in and take the mistakes that all the big three engines have made and not learn from as it appears then create an elite SE. IMO the general public is becoming more educated about the internet. The SE that is able to meet the consumers needs and the needs of the small mom and pop company who has a vested interest on the WWW will become the choice for the general public. There are more mom and pop companies out there than giant corporations on the internet, there are more average Joe users out there than techno geeks. The idea that whoever has the largest index, highest stock prices, most technology or coolest name should not suggest a long term monopoly of the internet and again IMO doesnt mean anything to the general public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again no offense to Matt or Google but I have to agree competition is good. I dont believe Google will EVER have a real reason to follow its own guidelines and mission statement until of Do No Evil until there is some competition out there for them and at this time there isnt. The one statement I will always remember from my father, we all know that most of us males didnt listen to our fathers because what could they know that we didnt already is &#8221; The same people you see going up that ladder of success, you will see coming right back down it&#8221;</p>
<p>I would say that the first SE that can set guidelines for webmaster, follow those guidelines and hold all to the same set of standards no matter how small or large you are as a company, brand themselves, try and become a friend to the webmaster community as Matt is trying to and most important rid their engine of spam will be the search engine that propels its way to the top market share. To poke a little fun also the first SE that gets rid of DMOZ <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Right now Google is not following its own mission statement of Do No Evil, they are trying but have shown that they will turn a blind eye to spam that is sitting in front of them. Matt/ Google is trying to relate to the webmaster community to build a strong relationship but hasnt shown it can act yet on all the advice this community is offering. Its almost like if you want to protect your home, hire a thief the build you a security system. Google has had some effect on spam but has not addressed what has been placed directly in front of them with spam and this sets an example that leads spammers to believe that Google might overlook these tactics if it is in Googles best interest.</p>
<p>Yahoo doesnt know what they are doing. Yahoo seems to be a bit confused. Yahoo is trying to impliment aspects from Google and MSN. Yahoo however has applied a set of standards that they seem to hold ALL TO and not just SOME, so for this they score the top grade above all search engines. As for Yahoo branding, it seems they lack the ability to market themselves to the mass public and have all but given up to compete with Google.</p>
<p>MSN, now this is IMHO right now is the only company that has the ability to compete with Google. MSN is still miles behind Google but they are working to create a SE that offers more relevancy than Google does at this present moment. MSN has the same problem though of addressing spam as Google does. Even though IMO MSN results are more relevant than Google&#8217;s, MSN results contain a lot of sites in the top of their serps that use spam techniques and I dont believe that they have the ability yet for their bot to detect a lot of spam. As for branding IMO again I forsee MSN as being the only company that has the financial backing to brand their name beyond what Google has already achieived for internet search. With a few buyouts here and there by both MSN and Google it should make the future of both search engines very interesting.</p>
<p>Maybe a company such as Ask can come in and take the mistakes that all the big three engines have made and not learn from as it appears then create an elite SE. IMO the general public is becoming more educated about the internet. The SE that is able to meet the consumers needs and the needs of the small mom and pop company who has a vested interest on the WWW will become the choice for the general public. There are more mom and pop companies out there than giant corporations on the internet, there are more average Joe users out there than techno geeks. The idea that whoever has the largest index, highest stock prices, most technology or coolest name should not suggest a long term monopoly of the internet and again IMO doesnt mean anything to the general public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13990</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask has always been the good quality yet largely unnoticed search entity. Part of this was their questionable approaches to rebranding and consolidation.   Maybe they are going to become a real contender which will be good for everybody including Google.   Nothing brings out the best in everybody like strong and deep competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask has always been the good quality yet largely unnoticed search entity. Part of this was their questionable approaches to rebranding and consolidation.   Maybe they are going to become a real contender which will be good for everybody including Google.   Nothing brings out the best in everybody like strong and deep competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post Matt.

Great to have a bit of industry affirmation for Gary - big ups to him on his Ask move!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Matt.</p>
<p>Great to have a bit of industry affirmation for Gary &#8211; big ups to him on his Ask move!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13970</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask is doing a fine job, and with Gary at the helm of OIR, I am sure they will go from strength to strength. Good luck Gary!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask is doing a fine job, and with Gary at the helm of OIR, I am sure they will go from strength to strength. Good luck Gary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Pate</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13967</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Pate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dean, thats funny. 

It&#039;s seems with all of Gary&#039;s experience, they should make a new search engine called &quot;Ask Gary&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean, thats funny. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s seems with all of Gary&#8217;s experience, they should make a new search engine called &#8220;Ask Gary&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Clatworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13965</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Clatworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Gary the new Jeeves ;)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Gary the new Jeeves <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bones</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13964</link>
		<dc:creator>Bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s great to see such friendlyness between rival search companies.

I&#039;m relatively new to your blog, but it&#039;s certainly fantastic reading and full of useful tips. Keep it comin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see such friendlyness between rival search companies.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m relatively new to your blog, but it&#8217;s certainly fantastic reading and full of useful tips. Keep it comin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13953</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt, that was an incredibly nice thing you said about Gary.  When you give a complement you don&#039;t mess around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, that was an incredibly nice thing you said about Gary.  When you give a complement you don&#8217;t mess around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: &quot;In many blogs that are set up similarly to yours, you have the front page with blog posts, and then you have the comment/permalink page as well, that also has the blog post. Could this situation cause duplicate content penalties?&quot;

If there is such a thing, yes. IMO, the way around this would be to block one within a robots.txt file.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;In many blogs that are set up similarly to yours, you have the front page with blog posts, and then you have the comment/permalink page as well, that also has the blog post. Could this situation cause duplicate content penalties?&#8221;</p>
<p>If there is such a thing, yes. IMO, the way around this would be to block one within a robots.txt file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary R. Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/gary-price-joins-ask/#comment-13941</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary R. Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=204#comment-13941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that ASK is putting together a nice team of employees over there and are working hard at making their search better for everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that ASK is putting together a nice team of employees over there and are working hard at making their search better for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a

 Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2013-05-19 17:56:17 by W3 Total Cache -->