Comments on: Eco-Friendly SEO

By: Tarun

Tarun — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:40:27 +0000

i Have 2 Blogs under same domain name now i want to combine both blogs (migrating from wordpress to wordpress), I am confused how to do this as i think i will lose google ranking as well as all links that links to my migrating page .

Will you please help me out with yours suggestion what i have to do in this case. current both of my blogs are in sub directory i will 1st migrate one directory blogs to another and after sometime migrate all in main directory.

By: Erling Andersen

Erling Andersen — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:55:10 +0000

I came here searching for eco-friendly flip-flops… You mean these things don’t exist??

By: Andre

Andre — Mon, 06 Feb 2006 04:03:36 +0000

Make a good site and leave the rest to “nature”. At times trying to make a perfect site just creates more problems.

By: Kydd

Kydd — Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:32:44 +0000

Matt,

Not sure if this is exactly relavant to this threaed but check out this work-around a site has been using via JavaScript:
document.write(‘var s1=\”window.loca\”;var s2=\”tion=\’http://www.some\”;var s3=\”site.com/index.html\’\”;eval(s1+s2+s3);’);

So they include a statement like this in the HEAD:
script language=”JavaScript” src=”docs/browseinf.js” /script

which contains the above JS. The original page is LOADED with keywords in the title, via ALT tags, and any link names to other pages on the site to these “meta redirects” contain actual keywords that users might search with. These guys have been getting away with this for at least 2 years…wget this URL to see what I mean:
http://www.centralcommand.com/

Kydd

By: Matt

Matt — Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:14:09 +0000

mike, I passed your suggestion on to the Sitemaps team. I don’t know how hard it would be to add, but thanks for mentioning it.

By: mike

mike — Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:07:57 +0000

Hey Matt,

I too think google sitemaps is great. I have one suggestion however that I think everyone will agree is pretty helpful.

Could we get the time of the crawling errors that are logged? I sometimes have some load issues on my webserver and would like to know if its related at all. Also server reboots happen at 3am once a week and I would like to know if thats a cause as well for the unreachable errors. I wasnt able to find a spot to email sitemaps directly about this suggestion ..

Keep up the great work!

Happy Holidays!

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:29:03 +0000

RE: “Google, which prides itself on the purity of its search results, agreed to give favored placement to content from AOL throughout its site, something it has never done before.”

Oh dear! Looks like Google has become like any other public company, that is, the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.

It’s a realy pity and is likely to be the thin edge of the wedge!

By: bobmutch

bobmutch — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:59:38 +0000

(Kill the other one Matt).
Henry Elliss:
>>>>Even more ridiculous was his description of the Google Dance being the battle between SEOs and Google – could he have DONE any less research?!?!

I am guessing he was doing a play on works on that one. Lets grand him that much.

>>>>They’ve got a big first-page article in today’s IT supplement about the Google / AOL buy too, wrongly (in my opinion) reasoning that AOL will be getting better rankings because of it.

Well according to nytimes.com it’s true.

“Finally, around 9 p.m., Richard D. Parsons, chief executive of Time Warner told Eric E. Schmidt, chief executive of Google, that he would accept Google’s recently sweetened offer. Google, which prides itself on the purity of its search results, agreed to give favored placement to content from AOL throughout its site, something it has never done before.”

Perhaps Matt whats to confirm or deny this report for us. Looks like AOL bought ranking juice for their domain.

By: Robert Oschler

Robert Oschler — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:58:26 +0000

Shades of “nigritude ultramarine” (if I spelled it right)?

By: bobmutch

bobmutch — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:57:28 +0000

[b]Henry Elliss[/b]:
>>>>Even more ridiculous was his description of the Google Dance being the battle between SEOs and Google – could he have DONE any less research?!?!

I am guessing he was doing a play on works on that one. Lets grand him that much.

>>>>They’ve got a big first-page article in today’s IT supplement about the Google / AOL buy too, wrongly (in my opinion) reasoning that AOL will be getting better rankings because of it.

Well according to [url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/technology/16cnd-aol.html?hp&\1\1ex=1134795600&\1\1en=00497831ec792f06&\1\1ei=5094&\1\1partner=homepage]nytimes.com[/url] it’s true.

Perhaps Matt whats to confirm or deny this report for us. Looks like AOL bought ranking juice for their domain.