<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Digg adds nofollow to some links</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Andy</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-734802</link> <dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:58:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-734802</guid> <description>Is it safe to say there’s no negative impact of nofollowing all external links on a website? In that case, wouldn’t the limit as time goes to infinity of dofollowed links across the web quickly approach zero?In other words, I’d expect to see the ratio of nofollowed links to regular links on the web be &gt;1 relatively soon, and quickly approach double digits thereafter.What impact does that have on Google’s ranking system and the general use of nofollow once the majority of links on the web have a nofollow attribute attached to them?My hindi song lyrics site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lyricswale.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lyricswale.com &lt;/a&gt; does not have nofollow, does is it going to effect my page rank, as it has been reduced from 4 to 1 in just 8 months.Please adviseJust a thought…</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it safe to say there’s no negative impact of nofollowing all external links on a website? In that case, wouldn’t the limit as time goes to infinity of dofollowed links across the web quickly approach zero?</p><p> In other words, I’d expect to see the ratio of nofollowed links to regular links on the web be &gt;1 relatively soon, and quickly approach double digits thereafter.</p><p> What impact does that have on Google’s ranking system and the general use of nofollow once the majority of links on the web have a nofollow attribute attached to them?</p><p>My hindi song lyrics site <a href="http://www.lyricswale.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://lyricswale.com" rel="nofollow">http://lyricswale.com</a> does not have nofollow, does is it going to effect my page rank, as it has been reduced from 4 to 1 in just 8 months.</p><p>Please advise</p><p> Just a thought…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gabri</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-459130</link> <dc:creator>gabri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:12:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-459130</guid> <description>I think rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; is no sense If you link a site,this site is relevant for you If for you is a shit of site, please dont link it If you are Digg and you have authomatic link, your content is shit because you dont selected it. Digg deserves to be punished cause of bad content, bad links, Nofollow make Digg not be punished by Google</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; is no sense<br /> If you link a site,this site is relevant for you<br /> If for you is a shit of site, please dont link it<br /> If you are Digg and you have authomatic link, your content is shit because you dont selected it. Digg deserves to be punished cause of bad content, bad links,<br /> Nofollow make Digg not be punished by Google</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RVs</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-448766</link> <dc:creator>RVs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-448766</guid> <description>I found that after making no follow Google gives some importance to the no follow link of digg. Is it right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that after making no follow Google gives some importance to the no follow link of digg. Is it right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-442967</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:48:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-442967</guid> <description>I agree with MK Primas, that there needs to be some thought about how smaller content creators (like me) can let people know what they&#039;re doing.For example, I was told that Digg start adding nofollows if an individual repeatedly promotes content from one site.I completely understand why this is in as it stops the spammers, but then how can I let people know about my content. Having only just started the site and with relatively few visitors, it&#039;s unlikely that many people will find me naturally or Digg me.It seems like a bit of a vicious circle that will only benefit larger already established sites.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with MK Primas, that there needs to be some thought about how smaller content creators (like me) can let people know what they&#8217;re doing.</p><p>For example, I was told that Digg start adding nofollows if an individual repeatedly promotes content from one site.</p><p>I completely understand why this is in as it stops the spammers, but then how can I let people know about my content. Having only just started the site and with relatively few visitors, it&#8217;s unlikely that many people will find me naturally or Digg me.</p><p>It seems like a bit of a vicious circle that will only benefit larger already established sites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mk Primas</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-396924</link> <dc:creator>Mk Primas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:26:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-396924</guid> <description>I have a question - how is a site supposed to legitimately get discovered if  it can&#039;t be seen?Sites like digg served to help unknown sites get into the index and thus through ideals they could get recognized and have people appredicate and cite their content. But now with more turning to nofollow, smaller content is not getting acknowledged - it can&#039;t get the credit it deserves because no one is able to find it in the first place. Sites like digg treat these sites as if they are spam because they simply have never heard of the site.I&#039;m sad to say your logic fails to account for this - assuming that content creator doesn&#039;t spam their link to people via email or through other blogs gratuitously they really can&#039;t be discovered. So really this sorta action encourages people to spam their website wherever they can so they can get recognized, the people with the knowledge and spammers will still find ways around it - but the small time content producer is the one who&#039;s really getting penalized.I know this isn&#039;t your fault, and it&#039;s a larger problem but just wondering whether you guys and gals over at webspam have really thought about this and how you intend to remedy or at least look into it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question &#8211; how is a site supposed to legitimately get discovered if  it can&#8217;t be seen?</p><p>Sites like digg served to help unknown sites get into the index and thus through ideals they could get recognized and have people appredicate and cite their content. But now with more turning to nofollow, smaller content is not getting acknowledged &#8211; it can&#8217;t get the credit it deserves because no one is able to find it in the first place. Sites like digg treat these sites as if they are spam because they simply have never heard of the site.</p><p>I&#8217;m sad to say your logic fails to account for this &#8211; assuming that content creator doesn&#8217;t spam their link to people via email or through other blogs gratuitously they really can&#8217;t be discovered. So really this sorta action encourages people to spam their website wherever they can so they can get recognized, the people with the knowledge and spammers will still find ways around it &#8211; but the small time content producer is the one who&#8217;s really getting penalized.</p><p>I know this isn&#8217;t your fault, and it&#8217;s a larger problem but just wondering whether you guys and gals over at webspam have really thought about this and how you intend to remedy or at least look into it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Search Ready SEO</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-393436</link> <dc:creator>Search Ready SEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:18:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-393436</guid> <description>Wow. Not to side track you away from this Digg post but I had no idea that Google Knol has been out and about since July 2008. Google sure is quiet about launching some of their applications. Interest way to compete with Wikipedia eventhough Google does not openly come out and say it is.Matt: I know you&#039;ve tons of comments to read on your blogs but if you get a chance, I&#039;d love to see a different blog entry just about this addressing some of my questions below.After reading more about Knol, Will it have the effect it will have on SERP domination? How well will these articles rank? Is Google planning on mining these data in future?The question is what are they going to do once they attribute you, the author, as an authoritative source on a particular subject matter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Not to side track you away from this Digg post but I had no idea that Google Knol has been out and about since July 2008. Google sure is quiet about launching some of their applications. Interest way to compete with Wikipedia eventhough Google does not openly come out and say it is.</p><p>Matt: I know you&#8217;ve tons of comments to read on your blogs but if you get a chance, I&#8217;d love to see a different blog entry just about this addressing some of my questions below.</p><p>After reading more about Knol, Will it have the effect it will have on SERP domination?<br /> How well will these articles rank?<br /> Is Google planning on mining these data in future?</p><p>The question is what are they going to do once they attribute you, the author, as an authoritative source on a particular subject matter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Search Ready SEO</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-393434</link> <dc:creator>Search Ready SEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:14:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-393434</guid> <description>Interesting move for Digg. I agree with you that this is pretty smart move for Digg. They are being selective and not just adding nofollow links to everything.I had no idea that Google does similar things with Knol. You just gave me something to research and read more about.Keep &#039;em coming! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting move for Digg. I agree with you that this is pretty smart move for Digg. They are being selective and not just adding nofollow links to everything.</p><p>I had no idea that Google does similar things with Knol. You just gave me something to research and read more about.</p><p>Keep &#8216;em coming! <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EchoBlogger</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-392774</link> <dc:creator>EchoBlogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:05:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-392774</guid> <description>Matt....adding no-follow to all posts in Digg will substantially reduces backlinks for a website.....Same is the case with Wikipedia...What is your opinion for the nofollow for the Yahoo Answers where hundreds of questions relating to the same topic will be asked there.Wont Google consider it as a spam !!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt&#8230;.adding no-follow to all posts in Digg will substantially reduces backlinks for a website&#8230;..Same is the case with Wikipedia&#8230;What is your opinion for the nofollow for the Yahoo Answers where hundreds of questions relating to the same topic will be asked there.Wont Google consider it as a spam !!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: matrix</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-392730</link> <dc:creator>matrix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:52:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-392730</guid> <description>Hi Matt, Just i want to know that, is social bookmarking  good for a site? Is it increase traffic?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br /> Just i want to know that, is social bookmarking  good for a site?<br /> Is it increase traffic?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Timothy Jones</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/digg-nofollow-links/#comment-392551</link> <dc:creator>Timothy Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=3021#comment-392551</guid> <description>@Paul:  Matt actually answered that question in his question-answering for bloggers. (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/whitehat-seo-tips-for-bloggers/)  He basically said that no, Google respects the nofollow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul:  Matt actually answered that question in his question-answering for bloggers. (<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/whitehat-seo-tips-for-bloggers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/whitehat-seo-tips-for-bloggers/</a>)  He basically said that no, Google respects the nofollow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 22:25:18 -->
