<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data portability for your email, searches, calendar, &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120557</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120557</guid>
		<description>I agree with Matt.  It's easy to get starry-eyed over "foundational" concepts like data portability, and the balls that you want to keep your eyes on are really the applications themselves.

Standards can cut both ways -- they can both be enablers and detriments to application flexibility, and have sometimes been purposely used to constrain, even while their ostensible purposes were exactly the opposite.

Having said that, it is true that sunlight is better than cesspools in these environments, and to the extent that the portability project encourages the former it may indeed have very significant positive contributions to make.

Of course the proof is in the eating, so to speak.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@vortex.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Matt.  It&#8217;s easy to get starry-eyed over &#8220;foundational&#8221; concepts like data portability, and the balls that you want to keep your eyes on are really the applications themselves.</p>
<p>Standards can cut both ways &#8212; they can both be enablers and detriments to application flexibility, and have sometimes been purposely used to constrain, even while their ostensible purposes were exactly the opposite.</p>
<p>Having said that, it is true that sunlight is better than cesspools in these environments, and to the extent that the portability project encourages the former it may indeed have very significant positive contributions to make.</p>
<p>Of course the proof is in the eating, so to speak.</p>
<p>&#8211;Lauren&#8211;<br />
Lauren Weinstein<br />
<a href="mailto:lauren@vortex.com">lauren@vortex.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120524</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120524</guid>
		<description>I just posted a rant about this yesterday. Nothing against the companies involved, but a group is only useful if you are doing something. If you look at the dataportability.org site, there is limited content and they are not hitting the issues yet. Maybe Scolbe's recent issues will bring it more to the forefront.

The link below is my "summary" on what they have so far.
http://regulargeek.com/2008/01/11/what-does-data-portability-mean-to-you/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a rant about this yesterday. Nothing against the companies involved, but a group is only useful if you are doing something. If you look at the dataportability.org site, there is limited content and they are not hitting the issues yet. Maybe Scolbe&#8217;s recent issues will bring it more to the forefront.</p>
<p>The link below is my &#8220;summary&#8221; on what they have so far.<br />
<a href="http://regulargeek.com/2008/01/11/what-does-data-portability-mean-to-you/" rel="nofollow">http://regulargeek.com/2008/01/11/what-does-data-portability-mean-to-you/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Borup jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120491</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Borup jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120491</guid>
		<description>Not to something quite different! Why doesn't Google host a "reversed" / "upside-down" day on their search results? "Simply" change ascending to descending on scores? It'll give a nice change for once ;-)

just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to something quite different! Why doesn&#8217;t Google host a &#8220;reversed&#8221; / &#8220;upside-down&#8221; day on their search results? &#8220;Simply&#8221; change ascending to descending on scores? It&#8217;ll give a nice change for once <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Rake</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120488</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Rake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120488</guid>
		<description>One of the things that was brought up in your last post about getting data out of Google was that you can't export chats from your Gmail history.  As far as I can tell, that's still the case.

If there was a setting to enable chats to show up in Gmail via POP/IMAP, I'd be all over that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that was brought up in your last post about getting data out of Google was that you can&#8217;t export chats from your Gmail history.  As far as I can tell, that&#8217;s still the case.</p>
<p>If there was a setting to enable chats to show up in Gmail via POP/IMAP, I&#8217;d be all over that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120487</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120487</guid>
		<description>I didn't know about some of the back up tools Google offers. Thanks for the notice ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about some of the back up tools Google offers. Thanks for the notice <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120483</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120483</guid>
		<description>I use Apple's .Mac feature and it accomplishes this pretty well. Given that at $99 a year .Mac is still alive I have to imagine there's enough demand, even on a typical consumer level, for at least basic data portability. Given the (sorta) recent notMac initiative I have to imagine there's waaaaaaaaay more demand for it without that hefty price tag. 

As a person that works exclusively on Macs I am lucky to have all of my mail, bookmarks, calendars, contacts, passwords, and preferences automatically synched across *all* of my computers, but I am of course in the vast minority. It's nice to see that someone is working on bringing this to life in a less proprietary format because it truly is a game changer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Apple&#8217;s .Mac feature and it accomplishes this pretty well. Given that at $99 a year .Mac is still alive I have to imagine there&#8217;s enough demand, even on a typical consumer level, for at least basic data portability. Given the (sorta) recent notMac initiative I have to imagine there&#8217;s waaaaaaaaay more demand for it without that hefty price tag. </p>
<p>As a person that works exclusively on Macs I am lucky to have all of my mail, bookmarks, calendars, contacts, passwords, and preferences automatically synched across *all* of my computers, but I am of course in the vast minority. It&#8217;s nice to see that someone is working on bringing this to life in a less proprietary format because it truly is a game changer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Yesid Mariño</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120481</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Yesid Mariño</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120481</guid>
		<description>That sounds good but I cannot understand exactly what you mean with this new technology. Maybe you can do a post for the newbies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds good but I cannot understand exactly what you mean with this new technology. Maybe you can do a post for the newbies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120462</link>
		<dc:creator>Silicon Valley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120462</guid>
		<description>It is remarkable that the  &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/01/03/ive-been-kicked-off-of-facebook/" rel="nofollow"&gt;one post by Scoble &lt;/a&gt; had so much viral impact in just one week among the Web 2.0 crowd.  :-o

There were probably others who are losing data - but they do not have a high profile pulpit to reveal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is remarkable that the  <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/01/03/ive-been-kicked-off-of-facebook/" rel="nofollow">one post by Scoble </a> had so much viral impact in just one week among the Web 2.0 crowd.  <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':-o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There were probably others who are losing data - but they do not have a high profile pulpit to reveal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi-Worded Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120457</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi-Worded Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120457</guid>
		<description>Sweet!  The &#60;code&#62; tags work here.  The overall geekiness of this site will increase by at least 5% following this important discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet!  The &lt;code&gt; tags work here.  The overall geekiness of this site will increase by at least 5% following this important discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi-Worded Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120456</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi-Worded Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/data-portability-for-your-email-searches-calendar/#comment-120456</guid>
		<description>&lt;code&gt;
&#60;?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?&#62;
&#60;Matt_Cutts&#62;
	&#60;XML_Interest&#62;false&#60;/XML_Interest&#62;
	&#60;Mad_Nerd_Skillz&#62;-1&#60;/Mad_Nerd_Skillz&#62;
&#60;/Matt_Cutts&#62;
&lt;/code&gt;
I'm not 100% convinced Data Portability is a good thing (although XML is mad dope shizzle fo' sho', yo.)  The big problem that I can see is the number of people who will want to get at anything from anywhere and set usernames and passwords such as "admin", "password", etc.

That's a bit generalized, but you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code><br />
&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?&gt;<br />
&lt;Matt_Cutts&gt;<br />
	&lt;XML_Interest&gt;false&lt;/XML_Interest&gt;<br />
	&lt;Mad_Nerd_Skillz&gt;-1&lt;/Mad_Nerd_Skillz&gt;<br />
&lt;/Matt_Cutts&gt;<br />
</code><br />
I&#8217;m not 100% convinced Data Portability is a good thing (although XML is mad dope shizzle fo&#8217; sho&#8217;, yo.)  The big problem that I can see is the number of people who will want to get at anything from anywhere and set usernames and passwords such as &#8220;admin&#8221;, &#8220;password&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a bit generalized, but you get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
