Comments on: Clickable transcript of my Canonical Link Element talk

By: mark

mark — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:46:44 +0000

Honestly. Tell us how long it took to link all that together?

By: Misty

Misty — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:41:00 +0000

Interesting although I agree it’s a lot of links. I think being able to just link the beginning of the most major points of a video would be useful. Sometimes I really don’t want to watch an entire video just to see the last portion.

By: Armand

Armand — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:04:59 +0000

I am amazed with the video links. I would spend a couple of hours all day to upload so many videos like that and I will need more times to create the hyperlinks on the post. It’s really a great effort and I believe that people do not like too many videos with a rapid link on a single page, oh no, on a single post, exactly

By: Aqeel Bilal Malik

Aqeel Bilal Malik — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:23:03 +0000

Matt,

This labeling is a great invention i believe.

I have a question,

Is Google looking to generate video search results from these captions, from time intervals and captions specified on that time ? If these captions are crawl able.

My question is for videos which are optimized and not optimized both ?

If it’s the scene then i think its great for content of those users who are ignorant of the techniques and usage of optimization standards.

By: paul

paul — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:03:42 +0000

Thank for the info. That the sitemap sorts out some of the duplicate content issues help me to understand all of this.

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:57:32 +0000

Kudos for your efforts, Matt, but somewhat puzzled…what was the purpose? Missed that somehow…

By: Mike Dammann

Mike Dammann — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:20:03 +0000

I definitely wouldn´t recommend doing that on a brandnew site.

By: Chris

Chris — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:27:57 +0000

Wow, I did not even think that this will pass as acceptable for google. It is not only awfully painful to the eyes, but also packs a ton of outbound links on a single page. I know that a human will immediately know that this is some content rich page, but with the Google algorithm not really involving humans, I don’t see how their computers can identify this as a non-spam.

You’re just full of suprises man.

By: Kunal Shah

Kunal Shah — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:31:37 +0000

This post looks very spammy……and irritating too…

By: Dave Bascom

Dave Bascom — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:19:43 +0000

This is very cool. It will change the game for video SEO when Google rolls out automatic closed caption capture for all video and audio files and then uses that audio text as part of the indexing algorithm just like you do for web pages now.