<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome Market Share: One Year Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kids</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-423544</link>
		<dc:creator>kids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-423544</guid>
		<description>Chrome stat at my health blog is 2%. Need extra work to push this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome stat at my health blog is 2%. Need extra work to push this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepadi</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-423539</link>
		<dc:creator>thepadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-423539</guid>
		<description>Stats for Chrome at my blog for last 30 days is 3.22%. Top score this year 3.93%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stats for Chrome at my blog for last 30 days is 3.22%. Top score this year 3.93%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimus01</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-422978</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimus01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-422978</guid>
		<description>I love Chrome! I’m really surprised that it hasn’t taken over IE in popularity. Time will tell I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Chrome! I’m really surprised that it hasn’t taken over IE in popularity. Time will tell I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horea</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-400526</link>
		<dc:creator>Horea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-400526</guid>
		<description>On www.imomarket.com :

1. Internet Explorer   59.84%	
2. Firefox   28.54%	
3. Opera   5.04%	
4. Chrome   3.74%

Visitors coming from:

1. Romania   58.41%
2. Spain   5.16%
3. United States   4.67%
4. France   3.50%
5. Italy   3.37%
6. Germany   2.32%
7. United Kingdom   1.79%
8. Belgium   1.54%
9. Moldova   1.42%
10. Austria   1.34%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a href="http://www.imomarket.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imomarket.com</a> :</p>
<p>1. Internet Explorer   59.84%<br />
2. Firefox   28.54%<br />
3. Opera   5.04%<br />
4. Chrome   3.74%</p>
<p>Visitors coming from:</p>
<p>1. Romania   58.41%<br />
2. Spain   5.16%<br />
3. United States   4.67%<br />
4. France   3.50%<br />
5. Italy   3.37%<br />
6. Germany   2.32%<br />
7. United Kingdom   1.79%<br />
8. Belgium   1.54%<br />
9. Moldova   1.42%<br />
10. Austria   1.34%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-397498</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-397498</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt

A bit late commenting on this post I know but just wanted to give a big shout out to the Chrome team.  I have a dialup internet connection (no broadband this far north of Scotland) and Chrome makes all the difference to my web browsing.  Probably a good 10-15% faster than all other browsers I use and you really can feel it.

Tis the Ferarri of web browsers and looking forward to new editions, just hope hey don&#039;t over burden it and slow it all down.

I&#039;m wondering.... I tend to read a lot of news on the web and use Google news for the majority of it, BBC news is great for browsing on dialup as it has great load times (less connecting to advert servers) but the Telegraph which Google features heavily I cannot load unless I go make a cup of tea and listen to a few songs before returning...!  I read sometime ago that Google were considering load times in their ranking, is this true?

Cheers

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt</p>
<p>A bit late commenting on this post I know but just wanted to give a big shout out to the Chrome team.  I have a dialup internet connection (no broadband this far north of Scotland) and Chrome makes all the difference to my web browsing.  Probably a good 10-15% faster than all other browsers I use and you really can feel it.</p>
<p>Tis the Ferarri of web browsers and looking forward to new editions, just hope hey don&#8217;t over burden it and slow it all down.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering&#8230;. I tend to read a lot of news on the web and use Google news for the majority of it, BBC news is great for browsing on dialup as it has great load times (less connecting to advert servers) but the Telegraph which Google features heavily I cannot load unless I go make a cup of tea and listen to a few songs before returning&#8230;!  I read sometime ago that Google were considering load times in their ranking, is this true?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-396214</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Islam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-396214</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I Want to share some data from a home improvement site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basementsystems.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Basement Systems&lt;/a&gt;
Data is for 1 month: 61,136 Visits
MSIE - 41,588 - 68.03%
FireFox - 12,864 - 21.04%
Safari - 4,362 - 7.13%
Chrome - 1,164 - 1.90%
Opera - 812 - 1.33%
and so on... 

I have several sites we manage and it seems as home improvement industry is using Internet Explorer heavily. 

For us developers here at Basement Systems, we mostly use Chrome over IE and FF. I personally use IE and FF a lot to test our web sites. But far as usability goes, Chrome Rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I Want to share some data from a home improvement site <a href="http://www.basementsystems.com" rel="nofollow">Basement Systems</a><br />
Data is for 1 month: 61,136 Visits<br />
MSIE &#8211; 41,588 &#8211; 68.03%<br />
FireFox &#8211; 12,864 &#8211; 21.04%<br />
Safari &#8211; 4,362 &#8211; 7.13%<br />
Chrome &#8211; 1,164 &#8211; 1.90%<br />
Opera &#8211; 812 &#8211; 1.33%<br />
and so on&#8230; </p>
<p>I have several sites we manage and it seems as home improvement industry is using Internet Explorer heavily. </p>
<p>For us developers here at Basement Systems, we mostly use Chrome over IE and FF. I personally use IE and FF a lot to test our web sites. But far as usability goes, Chrome Rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-394678</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-394678</guid>
		<description>Thats because your readers are computer users, not common people, i have a social engine network and Chrome is very far from your stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats because your readers are computer users, not common people, i have a social engine network and Chrome is very far from your stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Helvik</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-394386</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Helvik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-394386</guid>
		<description>I jumped on Chrome real early on and liked it but for whatever reason came back to Firefox. There been any significant changes within the last few months worth noting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jumped on Chrome real early on and liked it but for whatever reason came back to Firefox. There been any significant changes within the last few months worth noting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-393962</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-393962</guid>
		<description>My statistics are showing less than 2% market share for Google Chrome across the board on my tech sites, music sites and consumer sites (110+ sites and counting). Then again, I don&#039;t work for Google, so fellow Google employees (who are about the only ones using chrome) are not visiting my sites. 

There is an old saying &quot;Statistics are only meant to prove what they are trying to prove&quot;

Personally, I would rather use Lynx than install a Google app on my computer. A browser from a &quot;marketing&quot; company??? Well, what do you think pilgrim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My statistics are showing less than 2% market share for Google Chrome across the board on my tech sites, music sites and consumer sites (110+ sites and counting). Then again, I don&#8217;t work for Google, so fellow Google employees (who are about the only ones using chrome) are not visiting my sites. </p>
<p>There is an old saying &#8220;Statistics are only meant to prove what they are trying to prove&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally, I would rather use Lynx than install a Google app on my computer. A browser from a &#8220;marketing&#8221; company??? Well, what do you think pilgrim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchReadySEO</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/chrome-market-share-sept-2009/#comment-393438</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchReadySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=2994#comment-393438</guid>
		<description>Matt,
Stats on Chrome looks just about right. I have used it. I still juggle back and forth between FF and chrome.  Here is how I look at Chrome: Chrome is WebKit which is the foundation for half a dozen different major browsers. Chrome uses way less memory than any of the other browsers and the rendering and script performance absolutely trumps them too. (Not many people know this) The user interface is clean and maximizes screen space.

Many have complained about unresponsiveness in chrome, I think many fail to understand how chrome was designed. Chrome&#039;s design (isolating each tab as a separate copy) definitely favors multiple core CPUs. If you are running an out of date machine this may be a problem.

I just have my favorite features on FF which are not implemented in Chrome yet hence the reason to switch back and forth a bit between browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
Stats on Chrome looks just about right. I have used it. I still juggle back and forth between FF and chrome.  Here is how I look at Chrome: Chrome is WebKit which is the foundation for half a dozen different major browsers. Chrome uses way less memory than any of the other browsers and the rendering and script performance absolutely trumps them too. (Not many people know this) The user interface is clean and maximizes screen space.</p>
<p>Many have complained about unresponsiveness in chrome, I think many fail to understand how chrome was designed. Chrome&#8217;s design (isolating each tab as a separate copy) definitely favors multiple core CPUs. If you are running an out of date machine this may be a problem.</p>
<p>I just have my favorite features on FF which are not implemented in Chrome yet hence the reason to switch back and forth a bit between browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
