Comments on: Cache issues http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/ neat fun stuff Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:54:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Howard Keith http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-9366 Howard Keith Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:13:51 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-9366 On a daily basis I enter my website name ttp://www.istoppedgambling.com into the google search to see how things are going. A few weeks ago I hired a website optimization compnay. Yesterday moring my Cache links similar to were there. Now I get Sorry, no information is available for the URL www.istoppedgambling.com/ Find web pages that contain the term "www.istoppedgambling.com/" All my other web pages and ranks are still working. All of my other websites are fine. Please check my source code to see if the website optimation did anything to it. I have worked hard on my site for two years and do not understand what's happening to my site. Have you sen this before. On a daily basis I enter my website name ttp://www.istoppedgambling.com into the google search to see how things are going.

A few weeks ago I hired a website optimization compnay. Yesterday moring my Cache links similar to were there.

Now I get

Sorry, no information is available for the URL http://www.istoppedgambling.com/

Find web pages that contain the term “www.istoppedgambling.com/”

All my other web pages and ranks are still working.

All of my other websites are fine.

Please check my source code to see if the website optimation did anything to it.

I have worked hard on my site for two years and do not understand what’s happening to my site.

Have you sen this before.

]]> By: Scott http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-5548 Scott Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:22:24 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-5548 I guess this is what happens when you attain critical mass! I guess this is what happens when you attain critical mass!

]]> By: rob http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-5408 rob Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:39:33 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-5408 Hi Matt Old post I know, but I thought it might be worth asking you a Q on this as Serps seems to be a little thin on answers or explanations. An article here http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20051110GooglesJaggerUpdateTheDustBeginstoSettle.html makes reference to a phenomenom whereby the pages cache is that of a diffferent unrealted domain. [quote] I'll use one of my own as an example: www.precisioncompletion.com is a new unranked launch during Jagger and comes up correctly. Do a Google search for precisioncompletion.com and look at the cache - A PR7 and the wrong website! [/quote] Usually this happens when a domain either cloaks badly or is 302'ed for some reason or another, but from reading what he says it would appear that he is suggesting that it is not of his doing, and that the blame lies with Google. Ive seen this happen on other sites too. Is this related to some kind of transient internal index shuffle related to document index ID's or is it something more fundamental? Cheers Rob Hi Matt

Old post I know, but I thought it might be worth asking you a Q on this as Serps seems to be a little thin on answers or explanations.

An article here http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20051110GooglesJaggerUpdateTheDustBeginstoSettle.html makes reference to a phenomenom whereby the pages cache is that of a diffferent unrealted domain.

[quote]

I’ll use one of my own as an example: http://www.precisioncompletion.com is a new unranked launch during Jagger and comes up correctly.

Do a Google search for precisioncompletion.com and look at the cache - A PR7 and the wrong website!

[/quote]

Usually this happens when a domain either cloaks badly or is 302′ed for some reason or another, but from reading what he says it would appear that he is suggesting that it is not of his doing, and that the blame lies with Google.

Ive seen this happen on other sites too. Is this related to some kind of transient internal index shuffle related to document index ID’s or is it something more fundamental?

Cheers

Rob

]]> By: George http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-5245 George Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:19:59 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-5245 Is there a correct way to contact google about a page that has gone from cache (drop from PR 8 - 0) after years of being indexed? This concerns a volunteer site where we can find no weird code or any NOARCHIVE code or anything. Might be at the ISP level (problem with former employee), but I don't know where to look? The page still shows hundred of mentions, but no backlinks now, etc. It hasn't affected whole site, just one important page? Is there a correct way to contact google about a page that has gone from cache (drop from PR 8 - 0) after years of being indexed? This concerns a volunteer site where we can find no weird code or any NOARCHIVE code or anything. Might be at the ISP level (problem with former employee), but I don’t know where to look? The page still shows hundred of mentions, but no backlinks now, etc. It hasn’t affected whole site, just one important page?

]]> By: George http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-5206 George Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:53:40 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-5206 If asked, would google let a site know why it has both disappeared from cache and gone from PageRank 8 to 0 when the page has been up for years? I'm worried that a page of ours (volunteer sites) has been screwed with at an ISP level since there are no robots.txt codes to put it out of google cache -- and this doesn't seem to be related to the other cache notes on this board -- it may be related to a fired employee -- How does one find out if there is NOARCHIVE code at a level above the site level at an ISP when you don't really know where to look? Thanks. If asked, would google let a site know why it has both disappeared from cache and gone from PageRank 8 to 0 when the page has been up for years? I’m worried that a page of ours (volunteer sites) has been screwed with at an ISP level since there are no robots.txt codes to put it out of google cache -- and this doesn’t seem to be related to the other cache notes on this board -- it may be related to a fired employee --

How does one find out if there is NOARCHIVE code at a level above the site level at an ISP when you don’t really know where to look? Thanks.

]]> By: blazcom http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-5037 blazcom Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:35:19 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-5037 Hi I wonder if issues related with cache have influance on sites SERP's or link values on those sites. If so cache problems can change results in G?? And maby those problems are seen by users and webmasters as a Jagger 3 influance ?? Hi

I wonder if issues related with cache have influance on sites SERP’s or link values on those sites.

If so cache problems can change results in G??
And maby those problems are seen by users and webmasters as a Jagger 3 influance ??

]]> By: Tünde Gastgeb http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-4971 Tünde Gastgeb Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:29:57 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-4971 Hi Matt, I was very worried about the non existing cache issue, since I was checking the datas since my last big products relounch (end of August 2005) of new offers on my homepage ( I changed nearly 200 items ) Google checks daily and takes away a lot of informations, but nevertheless the new product-datas do not appear - I have seen only the old ones in the chache. Please, please help me - I am really desperate. Thanks in advance for your comment. Tünde Gastgeb Hi Matt,

I was very worried about the non existing cache issue, since I was checking the datas since my last big products relounch (end of August 2005) of new offers on my homepage ( I changed nearly 200 items ) Google checks daily and takes away a lot of informations, but nevertheless the new product-datas do not appear - I have seen only the old ones in the chache. Please, please help me - I am really desperate.

Thanks in advance for your comment.
Tünde Gastgeb

]]> By: Matt Wier http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-4434 Matt Wier Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:39:22 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-4434 Matt -- Thanks for providing such rich information. My home page was dropped from the Google cache on 11/10 and we have followed the advice posted on Google as well as your site, made some improvements and have submitted a reinclusion request. Is there an ETA for more fine tuning pertaining to the Google cache? Have fun in Vegas! p.s. sorry for double post... was on another page Matt -- Thanks for providing such rich information. My home page was dropped from the Google cache on 11/10 and we have followed the advice posted on Google as well as your site, made some improvements and have submitted a reinclusion request.

Is there an ETA for more fine tuning pertaining to the Google cache?

Have fun in Vegas!

p.s. sorry for double post... was on another page

]]> By: Parul http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-4391 Parul Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:28:23 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-4391 I can see still odd here. I can see few pages of April 2004 and October 2004 cache of online-web-solutions.com site. I can see still odd here. I can see few pages of April 2004 and October 2004 cache of online-web-solutions.com site.

]]> By: Glenn Ford http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/cache-issues/#comment-4118 Glenn Ford Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:04:15 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=93#comment-4118 Weary, It is indeed a puzzle! Weary,

It is indeed a puzzle!

]]>