<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Bugs?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/</link> <description>neat fun stuff</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Web Designer</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-1029065</link> <dc:creator>Web Designer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-1029065</guid> <description>In the Blogger interface, sometimes the button to change the template is missing, and then it just reappears after a day or so. This happens with the new interface. I wouldn&#039;t call this a bug really but perhaps the development team is just working on the new interface. I am sometimes notices this when logging in using admin email to Google apps. The link &quot;Manage this domain&quot; was not there. I wonder if anyone else had the same issue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Blogger interface, sometimes the button to change the template is missing, and then it just reappears after a day or so. This happens with the new interface. I wouldn&#8217;t call this a bug really but perhaps the development team is just working on the new interface. I am sometimes notices this when logging in using admin email to Google apps. The link &#8220;Manage this domain&#8221; was not there. I wonder if anyone else had the same issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ali Sadattalab</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-856605</link> <dc:creator>Ali Sadattalab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:33:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-856605</guid> <description>Google web history sunmit button looks buggy!! https://www.google.com/history/?hl=en</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google web history sunmit button looks buggy!!<br /> <a href="https://www.google.com/history/?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/history/?hl=en</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-588218</link> <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-588218</guid> <description>Search result navigation from http://www.google.com/ is broken in FireFox (3.6.6) if JavaScript is enabled.  Go to http://www.google.com/ and enter anything.  The initial search works, but the &quot;Next&quot; and &quot;Search&quot; buttons and the numbered result page links don&#039;t respond.  They change the address, but the content of the page doesn&#039;t change.The buttons and links work if JavaScript is disabled in FireFox.  Internet Explorer 8 and Opera (10.10) are also okay (even with JavaScript enabled).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search result navigation from <a href="http://www.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/</a> is broken in FireFox (3.6.6) if JavaScript is enabled.  Go to <a href="http://www.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/</a> and enter anything.  The initial search works, but the &#8220;Next&#8221; and &#8220;Search&#8221; buttons and the numbered result page links don&#8217;t respond.  They change the address, but the content of the page doesn&#8217;t change.</p><p>The buttons and links work if JavaScript is disabled in FireFox.  Internet Explorer 8 and Opera (10.10) are also okay (even with JavaScript enabled).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam B.</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-444533</link> <dc:creator>Sam B.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-444533</guid> <description>There is a relatvely new bug when surfing on the iPhone os version of Safari. More specifically when using iPod touch (it may be present on iPhone as well but I use iPod touch). When searching, you cannot click on any of the other search types (e.g. Image seach). Futhermore, if you try to work around this by add &quot;image&quot; to your search term and click on the search result that links to google image search, no images appear. Essentially it is now impossble to search images on iPhone os safari. It was not alway this way but more recently it has. Every time I update iPhone os, the problem persists.Sam B.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a relatvely new bug when surfing on the iPhone os version of Safari. More specifically when using iPod touch (it may be present on iPhone as well but I use iPod touch). When searching, you cannot click on any of the other search types (e.g. Image seach). Futhermore, if you try to work around this by add &#8220;image&#8221; to your search term and click on the search result that links to google image search, no images appear. Essentially it is now impossble to search images on iPhone os safari. It was not alway this way but more recently it has. Every time I update iPhone os, the problem persists.</p><p>Sam B.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-402133</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-402133</guid> <description>This is not a major issue, but I thought I would share it anyway since it appears to be buggy. If a search is performed with inurl:, and then preferences are changed to increase the number of results displayed, a 403 error is presented indicating that the query appears to be an automated request from either a virus or spyware.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a major issue, but I thought I would share it anyway since it appears to be buggy. If a search is performed with inurl:, and then preferences are changed to increase the number of results displayed, a 403 error is presented indicating that the query appears to be an automated request from either a virus or spyware.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andreas S.</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-341971</link> <dc:creator>Andreas S.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-341971</guid> <description>Google Calculator lg() Bug:Google uses different notation for interpretation logarithm functions:Google: Input=	Output lg(5)=	2,321928090 ln(5)=	1,609437910 log(5)=	0,698970004 ld(5)=	-WolframAlpha: Input=	Output lg(5)=	0,698970004 ln(5)=	1,609437912 log(5)=	0,698970004 ld(5)=	2,321928095In my interpretation: WolframAlpha is the correct output, here the standard notation: ln        log_e   natural logarithm lg        log_10 decadic logarithm ld        log_2   binary logarithm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Calculator lg() Bug:</p><p>Google uses different notation for interpretation logarithm functions:</p><p>Google:<br /> Input=	Output<br /> lg(5)=	2,321928090<br /> ln(5)=	1,609437910<br /> log(5)=	0,698970004<br /> ld(5)=	-</p><p>WolframAlpha:<br /> Input=	Output<br /> lg(5)=	0,698970004<br /> ln(5)=	1,609437912<br /> log(5)=	0,698970004<br /> ld(5)=	2,321928095</p><p>In my interpretation: WolframAlpha is the correct output, here the standard notation:<br /> ln        log_e   natural logarithm<br /> lg        log_10 decadic logarithm<br /> ld        log_2   binary logarithm</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Panos A</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-270145</link> <dc:creator>Panos A</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:22:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-270145</guid> <description>This applies to Google Patent Search.  When viewing a single patent, a button appears to &quot;Download to PDF&quot;.  This used to append the .PDF extension to the downloaded files, but as of a few weeks ago the extension is removed.  Now, every time a patent .pdf downloads the user must manually append the .pdf extension to the downloaded file.Easy to overcome, but a bit of a hassle.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This applies to Google Patent Search.  When viewing a single patent, a button appears to &#8220;Download to PDF&#8221;.  This used to append the .PDF extension to the downloaded files, but as of a few weeks ago the extension is removed.  Now, every time a patent .pdf downloads the user must manually append the .pdf extension to the downloaded file.</p><p>Easy to overcome, but a bit of a hassle.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oxtail</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-232693</link> <dc:creator>oxtail</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-232693</guid> <description>This relates to google search, when logged into gmail.When I log into gmail, and then go to google.com to do a search, for every search listing, there is this warning - &quot;This site may harm your computer&quot;.If I am not logged in to gmail, this warning disappears.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This relates to google search, when logged into gmail.</p><p>When I log into gmail, and then go to google.com to do a search, for every search listing, there is this warning &#8211; &#8220;This site may harm your computer&#8221;.</p><p>If I am not logged in to gmail, this warning disappears.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron (Demonz Media)</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-150136</link> <dc:creator>Aaron (Demonz Media)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-150136</guid> <description>Hello Matt,I had a good look through mattcutts.com / Google before I decided to report this one (there is one thread describing the problem at Webmaster World).http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum80/620.htmThe issue is that some websites using https:// are not showing PageRank in the Google Toolbar when they clearly should. For example the query [CIA] returns the official CIA website as the first result which uses https, but the page doesn&#039;t show any PageRank in the Google Toolbar.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Matt,</p><p>I had a good look through mattcutts.com / Google before I decided to report this one (there is one thread describing the problem at Webmaster World).</p><p><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum80/620.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum80/620.htm</a></p><p>The issue is that some websites using https:// are not showing PageRank in the Google Toolbar when they clearly should. For example the query [CIA] returns the official CIA website as the first result which uses https, but the page doesn&#8217;t show any PageRank in the Google Toolbar.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-144107</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:24:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs/#comment-144107</guid> <description>I&#039;ve had some odd problems with analytics.  For a time, I was only able to look analytics for one page.  I contacted Google and they took it very seriously.  A representative called me a couple of times and the problem was fixed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some odd problems with analytics.  For a time, I was only able to look analytics for one page.  I contacted Google and they took it very seriously.  A representative called me a couple of times and the problem was fixed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.mattcutts.com @ 2012-02-08 17:56:23 -->
