<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bigdaddy status update: almost there</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben parker</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-112444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-112444</guid>
		<description>Since I suspect your answer to Solution 1 would be that they wouldn’t pay you what you’re worth (and I can see why!) I suggest Solution 2 as a backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I suspect your answer to Solution 1 would be that they wouldn’t pay you what you’re worth (and I can see why!) I suggest Solution 2 as a backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdulrasool</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-106209</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdulrasool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-106209</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Google&#039;s employes manually check some of the Serp listings for quality of websites... I mean i have a really quality website targeting Debt Consolidation http://www.3debtconsolidation.com but it will not rank for the big terms... I think Google&#039;s Sandbox comes into play

For a site to be successful, it has to have quality content, professional design and strong inbound links built over a 2-3 year term... that&#039;s when you will actually rank for some big keywords... What do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Google&#8217;s employes manually check some of the Serp listings for quality of websites&#8230; I mean i have a really quality website targeting Debt Consolidation <a href="http://www.3debtconsolidation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.3debtconsolidation.com</a> but it will not rank for the big terms&#8230; I think Google&#8217;s Sandbox comes into play</p>
<p>For a site to be successful, it has to have quality content, professional design and strong inbound links built over a 2-3 year term&#8230; that&#8217;s when you will actually rank for some big keywords&#8230; What do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Throw Pillows</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-98690</link>
		<dc:creator>Throw Pillows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-98690</guid>
		<description>Seems like even though there is no algo update, the DC&#039;s are not showing the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like even though there is no algo update, the DC&#8217;s are not showing the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Silver Jewelry</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-90365</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Silver Jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-90365</guid>
		<description>Seems like the total number of search results are less now compared to it was before Big Daddy ? Looks like G drops a lot of spam sites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the total number of search results are less now compared to it was before Big Daddy ? Looks like G drops a lot of spam sites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scented Candles</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-90364</link>
		<dc:creator>Scented Candles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-90364</guid>
		<description>We have to assume that Big Daddy is all completed? Do you know when the next update approximately ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to assume that Big Daddy is all completed? Do you know when the next update approximately ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sothink</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-34831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sothink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-34831</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, 
Have you finished the BigDaddy project? You see, since later April, most of the pages of my site drop from Google, in the past,  we have more than 20 keywords can list in the top of the result.  I don&#039;t know how  long it would last, as more than twenty thousand customers are finding us every day on the web. I think it&#039;s a huge loss for my company, not so convenience for the cusotmer either. help us please, my site is www.sothink.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,<br />
Have you finished the BigDaddy project? You see, since later April, most of the pages of my site drop from Google, in the past,  we have more than 20 keywords can list in the top of the result.  I don&#8217;t know how  long it would last, as more than twenty thousand customers are finding us every day on the web. I think it&#8217;s a huge loss for my company, not so convenience for the cusotmer either. help us please, my site is <a href="http://www.sothink.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sothink.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Borgelt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-29541</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Borgelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-29541</guid>
		<description>My question had nothing to do with &quot;PageRank&quot; so to speak, more to the fact that google saw my website as two different site (non-www and www version) based on the page rank results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question had nothing to do with &#8220;PageRank&#8221; so to speak, more to the fact that google saw my website as two different site (non-www and www version) based on the page rank results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-25375</link>
		<dc:creator>steven joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 13:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-25375</guid>
		<description>Hi, got a big problem my site Buildsaver.co.uk selling 1000&#039;s products online with 1000&#039;s of indexed pages has recently rebranded from a different website biglink.biz ltd unfortunately we have dropped out of the first rankings and second page ranking and third... I know this has something to do with BD rollout as the sudden dissapearance coincided perfectly. i also know that biglink redirects to buildsaver and where product pages dont exist the buildsaver redirects again to a default.asp page. Google search probably thinks we are up to something. Do you think its wise to deindex all biglink pages? how could i do that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, got a big problem my site Buildsaver.co.uk selling 1000&#8217;s products online with 1000&#8217;s of indexed pages has recently rebranded from a different website biglink.biz ltd unfortunately we have dropped out of the first rankings and second page ranking and third&#8230; I know this has something to do with BD rollout as the sudden dissapearance coincided perfectly. i also know that biglink redirects to buildsaver and where product pages dont exist the buildsaver redirects again to a default.asp page. Google search probably thinks we are up to something. Do you think its wise to deindex all biglink pages? how could i do that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-24684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 12:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-24684</guid>
		<description>Is this BigDaddy switchover the reason why a lot of websites are having the problem of most of their pages being dropped out of the search results?  I think this problem should be addressed.  Everyone is left wondering what they should do to their sites to get themselves back into the search results.  
Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this BigDaddy switchover the reason why a lot of websites are having the problem of most of their pages being dropped out of the search results?  I think this problem should be addressed.  Everyone is left wondering what they should do to their sites to get themselves back into the search results.<br />
Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yatratravel</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy-status-update-almost-there/#comment-23731</link>
		<dc:creator>yatratravel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=253#comment-23731</guid>
		<description>How to find out if the website is listed as supplemental? When I type my domain name in google search and select &#039;containing the term&#039; - the website is not listed in the results at least in the first 5 to even 7 pages. Any input will help. Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to find out if the website is listed as supplemental? When I type my domain name in google search and select &#8216;containing the term&#8217; &#8211; the website is not listed in the results at least in the first 5 to even 7 pages. Any input will help. Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
