<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Beal and Shuman on click fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julio Marketing de Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-112762</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Marketing de Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-112762</guid>
		<description>Sam M Said,
August 31, 2007 @ 2:56 pm  - You should contact them through google webmasters. I am sure if there is a reasonable explnation you will have your adsense acc. back to good standing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam M Said,<br />
August 31, 2007 @ 2:56 pm  &#8211; You should contact them through google webmasters. I am sure if there is a reasonable explnation you will have your adsense acc. back to good standing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam M</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-111933</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-111933</guid>
		<description>I have just received an accusation of &quot;Click Fraud&quot; from google by email and wondered is there is any way I can respond to it? I know I haven&#039;t personally been involved in click fraud (other than the odd mistaken click everyone makes) and it hasn&#039;t happened on any site I publish adsense on without my knowledge .(Why would it, there is no gain AFAICS to anyone other than me)

The problem is that I run a Web Building Site called WebClickGo.com which allows users to create and publish their own sites (Just like google pages etc) and I place google ads on the free sites to cover costs. (I don&#039;t allow users to publish there own ads and actively suspend users that try)

I have had periods where I have had much higher then average click-thoughs but can explain these completely. One site for example publishes a weekly print newspaper in India on the weekend and for a few weeks (while it was using our service) there would be large amounts of traffic as readers of there newspaper visited the site at the weekend. This generated lots of click through for a while (The content very specific and the ads very targeted) even i was surprised. (though it seems they have now got a professional site developed and redirected their domain). This is the only unusual traffic my account has seen but as I said is completely explainable. 

Problem is without info from google I cant determine if this is the &quot;trigger&quot; or something else completely. I would love to sort this out as like most people I don&#039;t like being accused of something I&#039;ve not done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just received an accusation of &#8220;Click Fraud&#8221; from google by email and wondered is there is any way I can respond to it? I know I haven&#8217;t personally been involved in click fraud (other than the odd mistaken click everyone makes) and it hasn&#8217;t happened on any site I publish adsense on without my knowledge .(Why would it, there is no gain AFAICS to anyone other than me)</p>
<p>The problem is that I run a Web Building Site called WebClickGo.com which allows users to create and publish their own sites (Just like google pages etc) and I place google ads on the free sites to cover costs. (I don&#8217;t allow users to publish there own ads and actively suspend users that try)</p>
<p>I have had periods where I have had much higher then average click-thoughs but can explain these completely. One site for example publishes a weekly print newspaper in India on the weekend and for a few weeks (while it was using our service) there would be large amounts of traffic as readers of there newspaper visited the site at the weekend. This generated lots of click through for a while (The content very specific and the ads very targeted) even i was surprised. (though it seems they have now got a professional site developed and redirected their domain). This is the only unusual traffic my account has seen but as I said is completely explainable. </p>
<p>Problem is without info from google I cant determine if this is the &#8220;trigger&#8221; or something else completely. I would love to sort this out as like most people I don&#8217;t like being accused of something I&#8217;ve not done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Dabek</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Dabek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91937</guid>
		<description>Matt, can you please respond to this video we&#039;ve been seeing online?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXilEu2EfI&amp;eurl=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, can you please respond to this video we&#8217;ve been seeing online?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXilEu2EfI&amp;eurl=" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuXilEu2EfI&amp;eurl=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91845</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91845</guid>
		<description>As far as I&#039;m concerned, the issue with invalid clicks and click-fraud is highly overstated in popular media.  AdWords is still a highly effective means of lead generation for our clients (some of which spend over 200k per month).  Combine Google&#039;s efforts at eliminating invalid clicks with comprehensive ROI analytics, and you continue to have a winning formula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, the issue with invalid clicks and click-fraud is highly overstated in popular media.  AdWords is still a highly effective means of lead generation for our clients (some of which spend over 200k per month).  Combine Google&#8217;s efforts at eliminating invalid clicks with comprehensive ROI analytics, and you continue to have a winning formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Drabkin</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Drabkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91843</guid>
		<description>Shuman, thanks for the info on click quality - I keep reading about click fraud, but not much out there on click quality, and wondering how you classify.  

I am getting these questions all the time from our customers; I&#039;d say about 1/2 of our small to medium sized AdWords users do not use the content network prior to signing up with us, we typically do turn it on for them, but the conversion rate questions invariably come up.

What I am curious about is Google&#039;s position on sites with only ads and nothing else, how they are classified.  Just because they are ads only does not prove click fraud. But, we did a little analysis with a half dozen of our customers and found they convert very rarely...way way less than your standard content click - ok, not a huge relevation, but nice to prove it wih real customer data.  Ads only sites - are they classified in some special way, or just as a poor quality site, I wonder.  
Ron 
www.adisem.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shuman, thanks for the info on click quality &#8211; I keep reading about click fraud, but not much out there on click quality, and wondering how you classify.  </p>
<p>I am getting these questions all the time from our customers; I&#8217;d say about 1/2 of our small to medium sized AdWords users do not use the content network prior to signing up with us, we typically do turn it on for them, but the conversion rate questions invariably come up.</p>
<p>What I am curious about is Google&#8217;s position on sites with only ads and nothing else, how they are classified.  Just because they are ads only does not prove click fraud. But, we did a little analysis with a half dozen of our customers and found they convert very rarely&#8230;way way less than your standard content click &#8211; ok, not a huge relevation, but nice to prove it wih real customer data.  Ads only sites &#8211; are they classified in some special way, or just as a poor quality site, I wonder.<br />
Ron<br />
<a href="http://www.adisem.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adisem.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91832</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91832</guid>
		<description>ZZPrices Said,
December 14, 2006 @ 1:40 pm 

I was wondering if Google was going to do anything about those stupid SE’s that extract results from the Big 3, and then are listed in SE results. And at the top they’ll have zillions of Google Ads. It’s kind of redundant to gave SE results of SE results. 


ZZPrices,.. I think Google agrees with these types of sites doing this as some even say they work together with Google on this. And I agree, it&#039;s creating a bigger internet with completely redundant information, only order is changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZZPrices Said,<br />
December 14, 2006 @ 1:40 pm </p>
<p>I was wondering if Google was going to do anything about those stupid SE’s that extract results from the Big 3, and then are listed in SE results. And at the top they’ll have zillions of Google Ads. It’s kind of redundant to gave SE results of SE results. </p>
<p>ZZPrices,.. I think Google agrees with these types of sites doing this as some even say they work together with Google on this. And I agree, it&#8217;s creating a bigger internet with completely redundant information, only order is changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPCcurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91822</link>
		<dc:creator>CPCcurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91822</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Perhaps I&#039;ve missed it, but I don&#039;t see a hard limit on AdWords accounts in the documentation.  There is a daily limit, but I don&#039;t see anything that allows one to spend a fixed amount of money on a campaign, prior to the start of that campaign.  In the pen analogy, one spends a fixed amount of money on the pens that will be provided at the conference.  In this case, someone who steals the pens while no one&#039;s looking, or takes more pens than those who run the booth prefer (because they want to ensure enough pens for the expected amount of people who will visit the booth) is acting comparably to a click fraudster.

Furthermore, I&#039;d be surprised if there were a sizeable number of advertisers who view click fraud as a form of branding.  One must also consider that programs can be written that generate clicks that are never viewed by humans.

Actually, I&#039;m aware that there are advertisers who will attribute nonperforming campaigns to click fraud.  A problem here is that fraudsters can take advantage of the fact that ordinary web surfing need not necessarily result in conversions.  So the nonconverting clicks may or may not be fraudulent; we just don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;ve missed it, but I don&#8217;t see a hard limit on AdWords accounts in the documentation.  There is a daily limit, but I don&#8217;t see anything that allows one to spend a fixed amount of money on a campaign, prior to the start of that campaign.  In the pen analogy, one spends a fixed amount of money on the pens that will be provided at the conference.  In this case, someone who steals the pens while no one&#8217;s looking, or takes more pens than those who run the booth prefer (because they want to ensure enough pens for the expected amount of people who will visit the booth) is acting comparably to a click fraudster.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I&#8217;d be surprised if there were a sizeable number of advertisers who view click fraud as a form of branding.  One must also consider that programs can be written that generate clicks that are never viewed by humans.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m aware that there are advertisers who will attribute nonperforming campaigns to click fraud.  A problem here is that fraudsters can take advantage of the fact that ordinary web surfing need not necessarily result in conversions.  So the nonconverting clicks may or may not be fraudulent; we just don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91811</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 05:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91811</guid>
		<description>CPC, I think they are comparable.

The main point of a pen is to get your company name in front of people...  Even if a person is clicking on your ad to make their own adsense account money, they&#039;re still seeing your brand name in front of their eyes.

there IS a limit on spending... if you&#039;re running an adwords account without a max spending amount then you&#039;re doing it quite stupidly. (granted my company spends more in a month on adwords / overture than I make in a year.. but we still have limits)

I&#039;ve run adwords accounts for many customers... and you&#039;d be suprised how many people count every non-purchasing click as fraud.  I think that&#039;s the main problem here... there&#039;s too many varying differences in the definition of fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPC, I think they are comparable.</p>
<p>The main point of a pen is to get your company name in front of people&#8230;  Even if a person is clicking on your ad to make their own adsense account money, they&#8217;re still seeing your brand name in front of their eyes.</p>
<p>there IS a limit on spending&#8230; if you&#8217;re running an adwords account without a max spending amount then you&#8217;re doing it quite stupidly. (granted my company spends more in a month on adwords / overture than I make in a year.. but we still have limits)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve run adwords accounts for many customers&#8230; and you&#8217;d be suprised how many people count every non-purchasing click as fraud.  I think that&#8217;s the main problem here&#8230; there&#8217;s too many varying differences in the definition of fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPCcurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91807</link>
		<dc:creator>CPCcurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91807</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

The two situations aren&#039;t comparable.  When a company puts out pens at conferences, it&#039;s promotional -- designed for branding.  Even if the people taking the pens aren&#039;t current, or even potential customers, the people who wind up using the pens might very well be.  Pens are lent to coworkers, family, friends, etc.  Furthermore, the number of pens at a given conference is fixed and determined ahead of time.  Your analogy might carry more weight if conference attendees could cause arbitrary numbers of pens to be manufactured on demand at the promoting company&#039;s expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>The two situations aren&#8217;t comparable.  When a company puts out pens at conferences, it&#8217;s promotional &#8212; designed for branding.  Even if the people taking the pens aren&#8217;t current, or even potential customers, the people who wind up using the pens might very well be.  Pens are lent to coworkers, family, friends, etc.  Furthermore, the number of pens at a given conference is fixed and determined ahead of time.  Your analogy might carry more weight if conference attendees could cause arbitrary numbers of pens to be manufactured on demand at the promoting company&#8217;s expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZZPrices</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91797</link>
		<dc:creator>ZZPrices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/andy-beal-and-shuman-on-click-fraud/#comment-91797</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if Google was going to do anything about those stupid SE&#039;s that extract results from the Big 3, and then are listed in SE results. And at the top they&#039;ll have zillions of Google Ads. It&#039;s kind of redundant to gave SE results of SE results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if Google was going to do anything about those stupid SE&#8217;s that extract results from the Big 3, and then are listed in SE results. And at the top they&#8217;ll have zillions of Google Ads. It&#8217;s kind of redundant to gave SE results of SE results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
