<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A quick puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/</link>
	<description>neat fun stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sina</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-121774</link>
		<dc:creator>sina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-121774</guid>
		<description>Wow, a pretty decent amount of thought went into responding to that. Interesting stuff. I personally think there should be some bay to balance behavioral and content targeting. I can see each being more effective, depending on the search term and mindset of the user - maybe some A-B testing by Google to determine which is best for different sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a pretty decent amount of thought went into responding to that. Interesting stuff. I personally think there should be some bay to balance behavioral and content targeting. I can see each being more effective, depending on the search term and mindset of the user &#8211; maybe some A-B testing by Google to determine which is best for different sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Társasházkezelés</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-115701</link>
		<dc:creator>Társasházkezelés</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-115701</guid>
		<description>Egol.. 

As far as I know, Adsense is more about contextual targeting than about behavioral targeting. So it’s both targeting, but each a different type.
I don&#039;t understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egol.. </p>
<p>As far as I know, Adsense is more about contextual targeting than about behavioral targeting. So it’s both targeting, but each a different type.<br />
I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Marketing de Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-112768</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Marketing de Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-112768</guid>
		<description>So AdSense, by targeting to the content of a page, is more likely to show relevant ads based on my interests at that instant. Just my opinion.

In Brazil it seems that all websites show basically the same ads, this must be due to the fact there are not a lot of companies advertising using adwords on the content network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So AdSense, by targeting to the content of a page, is more likely to show relevant ads based on my interests at that instant. Just my opinion.</p>
<p>In Brazil it seems that all websites show basically the same ads, this must be due to the fact there are not a lot of companies advertising using adwords on the content network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-109875</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-109875</guid>
		<description>I think Adsense is a big joke. Never bothered to pay for this because:

I never click on any Adsense for the simple reason, Google will spend an enormous amount of effort make sure search results are relative to the page but the Adsense is not looked at this way. I have in the past clicked on an Adsense ad that was on a page I was browsing for Web Development. 3 out of the set of ads had nothing to do with the subject. They were just placed there because there was a link at the bottom saying web development by &#039;&#039;******&#039;&#039;.

They may have changed the way they do things but I wouldn&#039;t trust that every click you pay for is going to account for anything.

This automatically makes me think that behavioural targeting is just a fancy way of Google trying to say they know the behaviour of the person behind the mouse when this is absolutely impossible. And after witnessing first hand how inprecise they are with targeting ads I would have to say absolute BS.


However, I do think contextual targeting is powerful as well. I just think Google is a long ways of getting it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Adsense is a big joke. Never bothered to pay for this because:</p>
<p>I never click on any Adsense for the simple reason, Google will spend an enormous amount of effort make sure search results are relative to the page but the Adsense is not looked at this way. I have in the past clicked on an Adsense ad that was on a page I was browsing for Web Development. 3 out of the set of ads had nothing to do with the subject. They were just placed there because there was a link at the bottom saying web development by &#8221;******&#8221;.</p>
<p>They may have changed the way they do things but I wouldn&#8217;t trust that every click you pay for is going to account for anything.</p>
<p>This automatically makes me think that behavioural targeting is just a fancy way of Google trying to say they know the behaviour of the person behind the mouse when this is absolutely impossible. And after witnessing first hand how inprecise they are with targeting ads I would have to say absolute BS.</p>
<p>However, I do think contextual targeting is powerful as well. I just think Google is a long ways of getting it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-107734</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-107734</guid>
		<description>Roger Browne, nope, I hadn&#039;t heard anything. And I don&#039;t mean disrespect to behavioral targeting. I just think the page that a surfer is on *right now* is a great way to tell which ads should be shown to that surfer. So I do think contextual targeting is very powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Browne, nope, I hadn&#8217;t heard anything. And I don&#8217;t mean disrespect to behavioral targeting. I just think the page that a surfer is on *right now* is a great way to tell which ads should be shown to that surfer. So I do think contextual targeting is very powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-107703</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-107703</guid>
		<description>If I visit a web page about The Simpsons, content targeting will tell the advertiser that I&#039;m likely to be interested in The Simpsons. That&#039;s fine if the advertiser is selling Simpsons merchandise.

But what if the advertiser is selling Coca-Cola? They might like their ads to show if I&#039;m a teenager, or if I&#039;ve ever visited a Pepsi page.

Come to think of it, even someone who is selling Simpsons merchandise might pitch their ads differently if I&#039;m a person who regularly buys clothing online, as opposed to a person who buys geek gadgets.

So, I think there&#039;s room for content targeting and behavioral targeting, even sometimes at the same time.

PS: Maybe you posted this when you heard rumors that a competitor was about to launch behaviorally targeted ads :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I visit a web page about The Simpsons, content targeting will tell the advertiser that I&#8217;m likely to be interested in The Simpsons. That&#8217;s fine if the advertiser is selling Simpsons merchandise.</p>
<p>But what if the advertiser is selling Coca-Cola? They might like their ads to show if I&#8217;m a teenager, or if I&#8217;ve ever visited a Pepsi page.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, even someone who is selling Simpsons merchandise might pitch their ads differently if I&#8217;m a person who regularly buys clothing online, as opposed to a person who buys geek gadgets.</p>
<p>So, I think there&#8217;s room for content targeting and behavioral targeting, even sometimes at the same time.</p>
<p>PS: Maybe you posted this when you heard rumors that a competitor was about to launch behaviorally targeted ads <img src='http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: دروس وشروحات</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-105173</link>
		<dc:creator>دروس وشروحات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-105173</guid>
		<description>AdSense : behaviorial targeting :: hydrogen bonds : van der Waals forces 

Well I did some reading on this one,… and I hope I learned at least something from it. Here´s my take at it:

As far as I know, Adsense is more about contextual targeting than about behavioral targeting. So it’s both targeting, but each a different type.

Hydrogen bonds are a form of intermolecular forces and so are van der Waal’s forces. So they´re both intermolecular forces, but each a different type.


http://vb.ihsac.com
http://www.ihsac.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdSense : behaviorial targeting :: hydrogen bonds : van der Waals forces </p>
<p>Well I did some reading on this one,… and I hope I learned at least something from it. Here´s my take at it:</p>
<p>As far as I know, Adsense is more about contextual targeting than about behavioral targeting. So it’s both targeting, but each a different type.</p>
<p>Hydrogen bonds are a form of intermolecular forces and so are van der Waal’s forces. So they´re both intermolecular forces, but each a different type.</p>
<p><a href="http://vb.ihsac.com" rel="nofollow">http://vb.ihsac.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ihsac.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ihsac.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Tuknov</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Tuknov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104947</guid>
		<description>Benj,

I have to say your comment is outstanding. I personally see a connection between science and google algorithms. Not only math wise, but chemistry also. Amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benj,</p>
<p>I have to say your comment is outstanding. I personally see a connection between science and google algorithms. Not only math wise, but chemistry also. Amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benj Arriola</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104946</link>
		<dc:creator>Benj Arriola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104946</guid>
		<description>How do I see it? I was not really able to read all 96 comments but quickly skimmed through several of them. And many have mentioned that &lt;abbr title=&quot;hydrogen bond&quot;&gt;H-bonds&lt;/abbr&gt; are stronger than &lt;acronym title=&quot;Van der Waals&quot;&gt;vdw&lt;/acronym&gt;. True.

I do not know if there was anyone above that mentioned that H-bonds are only on some selected molecules. Usually those with Hydrogen and in many cases with Oxygen and Nitrogen. Not every molecule can H-bond with each other.

Van Der Waals is on every molecule.

Aside from having Adsense being a strong bond with website content as behavioral targeting is taking note of what a person is doing, where this can simply be interacting with everyone, relevant or irrelevant, irregardless of the content.

And since h-bonds and vdw are both &lt;acronym title=&quot;Intermolecular Forces of Attraction&quot;&gt;IMF&lt;/acronym&gt; and are not really real bonds like Covalent and Ionic bonds, these can easily break off physically if needed. The same way Adsense can easily kick you out if needed. Covalent and Ionic bonds usually need separation by a chemical means since this is already a compound. h-bonds and vdw are just formed in mixtures you can separate in many cases even with a porous filter. Adsense can do that too, with their &lt;em&gt;semi-permeable membrane spam-MFA filter&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I see it? I was not really able to read all 96 comments but quickly skimmed through several of them. And many have mentioned that <abbr title="hydrogen bond">H-bonds</abbr> are stronger than <acronym title="Van der Waals">vdw</acronym>. True.</p>
<p>I do not know if there was anyone above that mentioned that H-bonds are only on some selected molecules. Usually those with Hydrogen and in many cases with Oxygen and Nitrogen. Not every molecule can H-bond with each other.</p>
<p>Van Der Waals is on every molecule.</p>
<p>Aside from having Adsense being a strong bond with website content as behavioral targeting is taking note of what a person is doing, where this can simply be interacting with everyone, relevant or irrelevant, irregardless of the content.</p>
<p>And since h-bonds and vdw are both <acronym title="Intermolecular Forces of Attraction">IMF</acronym> and are not really real bonds like Covalent and Ionic bonds, these can easily break off physically if needed. The same way Adsense can easily kick you out if needed. Covalent and Ionic bonds usually need separation by a chemical means since this is already a compound. h-bonds and vdw are just formed in mixtures you can separate in many cases even with a porous filter. Adsense can do that too, with their <em>semi-permeable membrane spam-MFA filter</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ventrilo</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104734</link>
		<dc:creator>Ventrilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/a-quick-puzzle/#comment-104734</guid>
		<description>Yea, what was your rationale behind the &quot;puzzle&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, what was your rationale behind the &#8220;puzzle&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
