Comments on: $79 SEO software? http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/ neat fun stuff Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jason http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-90209 Jason Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:04:52 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-90209 Good article and content but there are sites that are legitimate and offer good SEO software for the money. Good article and content but there are sites that are legitimate and offer good SEO software for the money.

]]> By: Christian http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-75067 Christian Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:54:35 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-75067 Hi Matt, Why do people try to fake the market this way? Are there so many corrupt people out there that the white hats get overshadowed by these corrupt people? Well I think so anyway. Personally I though Search Engine Optimisation was all about producing great content, on a great platform to a great audience? Working your content into a magnificent piece that people will enjoy. Ok, keyword density, bla bla bla, but the essense of Organic SEM is to produce great copy - right? Something that people can use, read and enjoy. Anyway, I certainly wont be purchasing any such software and I wouldnt recommend anyone else does either. Great blog Matt... Cheers for the pointer - Christian Hi Matt,

Why do people try to fake the market this way? Are there so many corrupt people out there that the white hats get overshadowed by these corrupt people?

Well I think so anyway.

Personally I though Search Engine Optimisation was all about producing great content, on a great platform to a great audience? Working your content into a magnificent piece that people will enjoy. Ok, keyword density, bla bla bla, but the essense of Organic SEM is to produce great copy – right? Something that people can use, read and enjoy.

Anyway, I certainly wont be purchasing any such software and I wouldnt recommend anyone else does either.

Great blog Matt…

Cheers for the pointer – Christian

]]> By: Cristi http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-21330 Cristi Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:05:33 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-21330 Matt, What SudAfrique say is true. Yesterday I searched ezinearticles.com (they use google search box to search their site) to find relevant articles for a site and I got the same message telling I am using software or my computer is infected by a virus. I do not think I have searched more than 20 times before getting that message. What is funny is when I restarted Firefox I was able to search again... Matt,

What SudAfrique say is true. Yesterday I searched ezinearticles.com (they use google search box to search their site) to find relevant articles for a site and I got the same message telling I am using software or my computer is infected by a virus. I do not think I have searched more than 20 times before getting that message. What is funny is when I restarted Firefox I was able to search again…

]]> By: Gaz http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-19201 Gaz Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:55:44 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-19201 I think it's plainly obvious the software is completely bogus. If it was a real threat to a $3.6 billion a year company like Google, we would of seen the software on TV. It's not worth even considering. IMHO :-) I think it’s plainly obvious the software is completely bogus.

If it was a real threat to a $3.6 billion a year company like Google, we would of seen the software on TV.

It’s not worth even considering. IMHO :-)

]]> By: Randy C http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-14984 Randy C Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:18:50 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-14984 Your blog and/or website is what url? By not mentioning your website but giving the link to the aforementioned software leads me to believe that you are blog spamming. Definatly not fundamental SEO Matt, several of my collogues and I have reported various websites for creating web pages for every city, county and state in the country in an attempt (successful on MSN) to show up first in local searches for their specialty. Why does it seem that our reports are not acted on? The spam pages still exist and show up high in the results. Your blog and/or website is what url? By not mentioning your website but giving the link to the aforementioned software leads me to believe that you are blog spamming. Definatly not fundamental SEO

Matt, several of my collogues and I have reported various websites for creating web pages for every city, county and state in the country in an attempt (successful on MSN) to show up first in local searches for their specialty. Why does it seem that our reports are not acted on? The spam pages still exist and show up high in the results.

]]> By: Alojamiento Web http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-14796 Alojamiento Web Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:36:02 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-14796 Certainly, it's very risky to use any Black Hat Seo technic nowadays. In my humble opinion you should stick with proven white hat SEO although they could be very slow to show results. ------------ Andres Berger Certainly, it’s very risky to use any Black Hat Seo technic nowadays. In my humble opinion you should stick with proven white hat SEO although they could be very slow to show results.

————
Andres Berger

]]> By: FundamentalSEO http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-12620 FundamentalSEO Sun, 05 Feb 2006 07:58:55 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-12620 If we are talking about the same software, http://www.savemoneyfast.com - then I would have to disagree with some of these posts. Within my blog and my members the software has been working well. I will talk to some of my members using it but so far they are singing its glory. If we are talking about the same software, http://www.savemoneyfast.com – then I would have to disagree with some of these posts. Within my blog and my members the software has been working well. I will talk to some of my members using it but so far they are singing its glory.

]]> By: Skitzzo http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-7167 Skitzzo Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:30:20 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-7167 We've got a pretty interesting discussion going about the principal behind this software... would love to hear your input on <a href="http://www.seorefugee.com/forums/google-optimization/595-click-through-rate-algo.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> Matt We’ve got a pretty interesting discussion going about the principal behind this software… would love to hear your input on this Matt

]]> By: Jo Cards http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-5524 Jo Cards Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:13:18 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-5524 I read through all the comments and what everyone is missing here is that google uses javascript to track click through and of course they use click through as a small part of their algorithm, wouldn't you? They create an image using javascript which isn't really an image but just data about what the search was who you are and which link you clicked on. This image loads quicker then it takes for the url you clicked on. Therefore RankAttack misses the boat altogether. Using this software in excess would simply show up on googles spam reports. In my speculative opinion I think that google has done the right thing by using javascript because when you click you go straight to the site rather then going to a google URL then being redirected. Therefore it benifits both google and the end user. I read through all the comments and what everyone is missing here is that google uses javascript to track click through and of course they use click through as a small part of their algorithm, wouldn’t you?

They create an image using javascript which isn’t really an image but just data about what the search was who you are and which link you clicked on. This image loads quicker then it takes for the url you clicked on. Therefore RankAttack misses the boat altogether. Using this software in excess would simply show up on googles spam reports.

In my speculative opinion I think that google has done the right thing by using javascript because when you click you go straight to the site rather then going to a google URL then being redirected. Therefore it benifits both google and the end user.

]]> By: Mark http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/79-seo-software/#comment-5349 Mark Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:53:11 +0000 http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/?p=51#comment-5349 Would a static ip work if it was used for the queries submission? Would a static ip work if it was used for the queries submission?

]]>